Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Necessity of sine-cosine joint measurement

Giacomo Mauro D’Ariano, Matteo G. A. Paris

Published Dec 1, 1993• 18 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The quantum measurement of trigonometric variables is revisted. We show that the probability distributions of the sine and cosine operators of Susskind and Glogower [Physics 1, 49 (1964)] suffer unphysical features for nonclassical states. We suggest that any measurement of a trigonometric variable needs necessarily a joint measurement of the two cosine-sine phase quadratures. In this way unphysical quantum statistics are avoided, and no violation of the trigonometric calculus occurs for expected values. We show that this trigonometric measurement can be defined in general terms in the framework of quantum estimation theory.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.48.r4039

Related papers

Investigations of the operationally defined quantum phase

J. W. Noh, A. Fougeres, L. Mandeļ

We have previously developed a formalism for identifying quantum operators corresponding to the sine and cosine of the phase differences between two quantum fields.1 Our approach is based on what is actually measured in an experiment, and it leads to different operators for different measurement schemes. Predictions based on our theory differ from those based on the Susskind-Glogower and the Pegg-Barnett operators. We now present the results of new experiments designed to test the validity of our approach, including measurements of the higher moments of the sine and cosine for different quantum states. The results of all measurements confirm our formalism in every case.

Annual Meeting Optical Society of America•Jan 1, 1992•0 citations

Compatibility of the cosine and sine operators

A. Luk, V. Peinová

By modifying the phase formalism of Pegg and Barnett [Phys. Rev. A 39, 1665 (1989)], we illustrate the idea of Susskind and Glogower [Physics 1, 49 (1964)] concerning the zero uncertainty of their cosine and sine operators in the phase state.

Physical Review A•Nov 1, 1990•8 citations

Further investigations of the operationally defined quantum phase

J. W. Noh, A. Fougères, L. Mandeļ

The formalism that we have previously developed for the phase difference between two quantized electromagnetic fields, which is intimately connected with the measurement process, is explored further, both theoretically and experimentally. We calculate the higher moments of the measured cosine and sine operators for certain two-mode Fock states \ensuremath{\Vert}${\mathit{n}}_{1}$,${\mathit{n}}_{2}$〉, and show how the measurement itself exerts a bias on the outcome. We find that the corresponding phase difference becomes uniform over the interval 0 to 2\ensuremath{\pi} only in the limit ${\mathit{n}}_{1}$,${\mathit{n}}_{2}$\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}. On the other hand, the phase difference associated with the product of a coherent state \ensuremath{\Vert}v〉 with a Fock state can be random for large \ensuremath{\Vert}v\ensuremath{\Vert}, because of the availability of an infinite number of photons. Several of our theoretical predictions are compared with predictions based on the Susskind-Glogower and the Pegg-Barnett operators, and they are also tested by experiment. We find that the experimental results confirm our theory in every case, and this includes tests of the higher moments of the measured cosine operator.

Physical Review A•Sep 1, 1992•117 citations

Operational approach to the phase of a quantum field

J. W. Noh, A. Fougères, L. Mandeļ

We examine the problem of determining the phase difference between two optical fields, first for classical and later for quantum fields, by reference to two simple measurement schemes that yield the sine and/or cosine of the phase difference between classical fields. We show that certain difficulties exist even within the framework of semiclassical radiation theory when the field is very weak, and particularly when amplitude and phase fluctuations are correlated. We find that a clear distinction has to be made between the measured values of the sine or cosine and the values that can be inferred from a series of repeated measurements. A corresponding distinction can be made also for a quantum field, although the interpretation is not the same. The dynamical variables chosen to represent the cosine and sine that emerge from the discussion of the measurement schemes commute when the sine and cosine are obtained together, but not when the measurement yields one or the other. These sine and cosine operators have well-defined values only when there is a large dispersion of the photon number. We arrive at expressions for the moments of the measured and of the inferred sines and cosines that differ from most previous treatments. The expressions are applied to optical fields in several different quantum states. Only for the Fock state and for the so-called phase state, which was treated recently at some length by Pegg and Barnett [Phys. Rev. A 39, 1665 (1989)], do the measured and the inferred moments coincide. Our analysis of the problem of phase measurement leads to the conclusion that the appropriate dynamical variables for the measured sine and cosine depend on the measurement scheme, and that different schemes correspond to different operators.

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 1992•237 citations

Quantum paradoxes originating from the nonclassical statistics of physical properties related to each other by half-periodic transformations

Holger Friedrich Hofmann

Quantum paradoxes show that quantum statistics can exceed the limits of positive joint probabilities for physical properties that cannot be measured jointly. It is therefore impossible to describe the relations between the different physical properties of a quantum system by assigning joint realities to their observable values. Instead, recent experimental results obtained by weak measurements suggest that nonclassical correlations could be expressed by complex valued quasiprobabilities, where the phases of the complex probabilities express the action of transformations between the noncommuting properties [H. F. Hofmann, New J. Phys. 13, 103009 (2011)]. In these relations, negative probabilities necessarily emerge whenever the physical properties involved are related to each other by half-periodic transformations, since such transformations are characterized by action phases of $\ensuremath{\pi}$ in their complex probabilities. It is therefore possible to trace the failure of realist assumptions back to a fundamental and universally valid relation between statistics and dynamics that associates half-periodic transformations with negative probabilities.

arXiv:1406.3085•Physical Review A•Jun 22, 2015•26 citations

A Remark on Joint Probability Distributions for Quantum Observables

Slawomir Bugajski

A simple formal result concerning joint probability distributions in quantum mechanics is obtained. It is shown that some relatively weak properties of the joint distributions cannot be satisfied in the scope of standard quantum mechanics.

Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A•Nov 1, 1978•4 citations
The quantum measurement of trigonometric variables is revisted. We show that the probability distributions of the sine and cosine operators of Susskind and Glogower [Physics 1, 49 (1964)] suffer unphysical features for nonclassical states. We suggest that any measurement of a trigonometric variable needs necessarily a joint measurement of the two cosine-sine phase quadratures. In this way unphysical quantum statistics are avoided, and no violation of the trigonometric calculus occurs for expected values. We show that this trigonometric measurement can be defined in general terms in the framework of quantum estimation theory.
We have previously developed a formalism for identifying quantum operators corresponding to the sine and cosine of the phase differences between two quantum fields.1 Our approach is based on what is actually measured in an experiment, and it leads to different operators for different measurement schemes. Predictions based on our theory differ from those based on the Susskind-Glogower and the Pegg-Barnett operators. We now present the results of new experiments designed to test the validity of our approach, including measurements of the higher moments of the sine and cosine for different quantum states. The results of all measurements confirm our formalism in every case.
The formalism that we have previously developed for the phase difference between two quantized electromagnetic fields, which is intimately connected with the measurement process, is explored further, both theoretically and experimentally. We calculate the higher moments of the measured cosine and sine operators for certain two-mode Fock states \ensuremath{\Vert}n1{\mathit{n}}_{1}n1​,n2{\mathit{n}}_{2}n2​〉, and show how the measurement itself exerts a bias on the outcome. We find that the corresponding phase difference becomes uniform over the interval 0 to 2\ensuremath{\pi} only in the limit n1{\mathit{n}}_{1}n1​,n2{\mathit{n}}_{2}n2​\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}. On the other hand, the phase difference associated with the product of a coherent state \ensuremath{\Vert}v〉 with a Fock state can be random for large \ensuremath{\Vert}v\ensuremath{\Vert}, because of the availability of an infinite number of photons. Several of our theoretical predictions are compared with predictions based on the Susskind-Glogower and the Pegg-Barnett operators, and they are also tested by experiment. We find that the experimental results confirm our theory in every case, and this includes tests of the higher moments of the measured cosine operator.
We examine the problem of determining the phase difference between two optical fields, first for classical and later for quantum fields, by reference to two simple measurement schemes that yield the sine and/or cosine of the phase difference between classical fields. We show that certain difficulties exist even within the framework of semiclassical radiation theory when the field is very weak, and particularly when amplitude and phase fluctuations are correlated. We find that a clear distinction has to be made between the measured values of the sine or cosine and the values that can be inferred from a series of repeated measurements. A corresponding distinction can be made also for a quantum field, although the interpretation is not the same. The dynamical variables chosen to represent the cosine and sine that emerge from the discussion of the measurement schemes commute when the sine and cosine are obtained together, but not when the measurement yields one or the other. These sine and cosine operators have well-defined values only when there is a large dispersion of the photon number. We arrive at expressions for the moments of the measured and of the inferred sines and cosines that differ from most previous treatments. The expressions are applied to optical fields in several different quantum states. Only for the Fock state and for the so-called phase state, which was treated recently at some length by Pegg and Barnett [Phys. Rev. A 39, 1665 (1989)], do the measured and the inferred moments coincide. Our analysis of the problem of phase measurement leads to the conclusion that the appropriate dynamical variables for the measured sine and cosine depend on the measurement scheme, and that different schemes correspond to different operators.
Quantum paradoxes show that quantum statistics can exceed the limits of positive joint probabilities for physical properties that cannot be measured jointly. It is therefore impossible to describe the relations between the different physical properties of a quantum system by assigning joint realities to their observable values. Instead, recent experimental results obtained by weak measurements suggest that nonclassical correlations could be expressed by complex valued quasiprobabilities, where the phases of the complex probabilities express the action of transformations between the noncommuting properties [H. F. Hofmann, New J. Phys. 13, 103009 (2011)]. In these relations, negative probabilities necessarily emerge whenever the physical properties involved are related to each other by half-periodic transformations, since such transformations are characterized by action phases of $\ensuremath{\pi}$ in their complex probabilities. It is therefore possible to trace the failure of realist assumptions back to a fundamental and universally valid relation between statistics and dynamics that associates half-periodic transformations with negative probabilities.