Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics

Observation of stimulated anti-Stokes Raman gain in inverted atomic iodine

Robert L. Carman, W. Howard Lowdermilk

Published Sep 1, 1974• 3 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1109/jqe.1974.1068495

Related papers

Observation of anti-Stokes-stimulated Raman scattering and two-photon emission in lithium and sodium vapors

F. Z. Chen, Chao Wu, T. S. Yih +3 more

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 1988•1 citation

Stimulated Raman Scattering in the Anti-Stokes Region

V. N. Lugovoǐ

Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics•Oct 1, 1965•0 citations

Emission of Stokes and Anti-Stokes Components of Arbitrary Orders in Stimulated Raman Scattering

V. N. Lugovoǐ

OptSp•Sep 1, 1966•0 citations

Observation of Stimulated Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering in Inverted Atomic Iodine

Robert L. Carman, W. Howard Lowdermilk

Nonresonant stimulated anti-Stokes Raman scattering from an inverted population in atomic iodine has been observed. The population inversion was achieved by flash photolysis of trifluoromethyliodide. A gain of ${e}^{7}$ was measured for a laser probe pulse at the anti-Stokes wavelength passing through the inverted iodine coincident with a laser pump pulse. This result is in good agreement with theoretical predictions.

Physical Review Letters•Jul 22, 1974•30 citations

Anti-Stokes Raman Emission in hverted Atomic Selenium

David G. Cooper

•Jan 1, 1990•0 citations

Cross section and hyperfine structure of the atomic iodine ( P122−P322 ) Raman transition

Kai J. Drühl

The cross section for anti-Stokes Raman scattering from inverted atomic iodine is calculated by a semiempirical procedure and shown to be dominated by the quadrupole component. Relative intensities for ${F}_{2}\ensuremath{-}{F}_{1}$ transitions ${F}_{2}$ and ${F}_{1}$ are the total angular momenta of the initial and final hyperfine split states) in the hyperfine split multiplets are calculated, and maximal intensity of 25% is found for the 2-4 transition. However, in stimulated Raman scattering maximal gain is expected at the position of the 3-2 line, where collisional broadening and Stark splitting lead to a strong overlap of three lines. The resulting effective cross section is about 33% of the total cross section. For scattering with pump radiation at $\ensuremath{\lambda}=1.06$ \ensuremath{\mu}m an effective cross section of $\frac{d\ensuremath{\sigma}}{d\ensuremath{\Omega}}=0.71\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}28}$ ${\mathrm{cm}}^{2}$ is obtained, with an estimated accuracy of 20%. This is somewhat lower than the estimate $\frac{d\ensuremath{\sigma}}{d\ensuremath{\Omega}}={10}^{\ensuremath{-}28}$ ${\mathrm{cm}}^{2}$ which has been published recently.

Physical Review A•Aug 1, 1982•8 citations
Nonresonant stimulated anti-Stokes Raman scattering from an inverted population in atomic iodine has been observed. The population inversion was achieved by flash photolysis of trifluoromethyliodide. A gain of e7{e}^{7}e7 was measured for a laser probe pulse at the anti-Stokes wavelength passing through the inverted iodine coincident with a laser pump pulse. This result is in good agreement with theoretical predictions.
The cross section for anti-Stokes Raman scattering from inverted atomic iodine is calculated by a semiempirical procedure and shown to be dominated by the quadrupole component. Relative intensities for ${F}_{2}\ensuremath{-}{F}_{1}$ transitions F2{F}_{2}F2​ and F1{F}_{1}F1​ are the total angular momenta of the initial and final hyperfine split states) in the hyperfine split multiplets are calculated, and maximal intensity of 25% is found for the 2-4 transition. However, in stimulated Raman scattering maximal gain is expected at the position of the 3-2 line, where collisional broadening and Stark splitting lead to a strong overlap of three lines. The resulting effective cross section is about 33% of the total cross section. For scattering with pump radiation at $\ensuremath{\lambda}=1.06$ \ensuremath{\mu}m an effective cross section of $\frac{d\ensuremath{\sigma}}{d\ensuremath{\Omega}}=0.71\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}28}$ cm2{\mathrm{cm}}^{2}cm2 is obtained, with an estimated accuracy of 20%. This is somewhat lower than the estimate $\frac{d\ensuremath{\sigma}}{d\ensuremath{\Omega}}={10}^{\ensuremath{-}28}$ cm2{\mathrm{cm}}^{2}cm2 which has been published recently.