Abstract This chapter formally presents the representation of the quantum density operator by phase space distribution functionals of phase space fields, leading to expressions for quantum correlation functions in terms of phase space functional integrals, where the field functions—complex fields for bosons, Grassmann fields for fermions—replace field annihilation and creation operators. The emphasis is on double-phase-space normally ordered (positive P type) normalised distribution functionals, with distinct fields for annihilation and creation field operators; however, symmetrically ordered (Wigner type) distribution functionals are also considered, along with unnormalised B distribution functionals, which lead to phase space functional integrals for Fock position state populations and coherences. Characteristic functionals are first defined and then shown to be related to distribution functionals via phase space functional integrals. The existence of the distribution functionals is demonstrated from previous results for equivalent distribution functions by using mode expansions.
A representation is introduced for the density operator of the electromagnetic field that is suitable for all density operators and that reduces to the coherent-state
P representation when the latter exists. It expresses the density operator $\ensuremath{\rho}$ as the sum of four terms, each of which is a two-dimensional weighted integral over outer products of coherent states. The first integral has the form of the
P representation, i.e., the outer products are projection operators. The absence of singularities in this term is achieved by the presence of the three supplementary integrals which vanish when the density operator possesses the
P representation. In general, for stationary density operators, only the first two terms of the regularized
P representation are necessary. A simple prescription is given for obtaining the four weight functions of this representation from the function $〈\ensuremath{\alpha}|\ensuremath{\rho}|\ensuremath{\alpha}〉$, where $|\ensuremath{\alpha}〉$ is a coherent state and $\ensuremath{\rho}$ is the density operator. According to this prescription, the
P representation does not exist and one or more of the supplementary, regularizing terms is necessary when the function $〈\ensuremath{\alpha}|\ensuremath{\rho}|\ensuremath{\alpha}〉$ contains a term that decreases more rapidly than $\mathrm{exp}(\ensuremath{-}{|\ensuremath{\alpha}|}^{2})$ as $|\ensuremath{\alpha}|\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}$. The regularized
P representation affords nonsingular integral expressions for all density operators and for most expectation values, including, when they are finite, those of the normally ordered products of the creation and annihilation operators, ${a}^{\ifmmode\dagger\else\textdagger\fi{}}$ and
a. The construction and use of this representation is illustrated with the aid of simple examples in which the density operator does not possess the
P representation.
In Chapter 4, we introduced the concept of the photon number representation of the electromagnetic (EM) field that is based on the number states, the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian of the EM field. However, this is not the only possible representation, in fact not always the most convenient. In this chapter, we introduce the concept of phase space representations of a quantum system which is in a state described by the density operator ρˆ. The density operator of a given system encodes classical as well as non-classical (quantum) properties of the system. How to distinguish these two kinds of properties is of basic importance in quantum optics. Therefore, we shall address this issue by using representations of the density operator that are based on the parametric space of complex eigenvalues of the annihilation operator aˆ in a coherent state |α〉. We first determine what we mean by the density operator of a quantum system and discuss its basic properties. Next, we introduce different representations of the density operator in terms of coherent state projectors |α〉〈α|. The representations show that a state of the EM field or of an arbitrary quantum system may be regarded as a mixture of coherent states. Along the way, we will learn how to find the P , Q and Wigner representations of the density operator, what are their properties, how to interpret the properties and how to calculate relations between the different representations. Most importantly, certain field states exhibit non- classical features and these non-classical features can be manifested in the phase space representations. Accordingly, we will learn how the representations are very convenient tools to describe quantum states of simple systems.
Abstract The Glauber-Sudarshan P-representation for bosons is well-known within quantum optics, and is widely applied to problems involving photon statistics. Less familiar, perhaps, is its fermionic counterpart, introduced by Cahill and Glauber. We present a derivation of both the bosonic and fermionic distributions and, in doing so, demonstrate the reason for the existence of two distinct fermionic forms and the relationship between these. We consider both single mode systems and also multiparticle systems with many modes. Expressions for the moments involving products of mode annihilation and creation operators are obtained. For simplicity only one type of boson or fermion will be considered, but generalising to more types is straightforward.
The theory of amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) and the gain–length product at saturation is revised. Formulas valid for both peak and integrated lines are given. In the latter case the solution for a general Voigt stimulated-emission line shape is presented, whereas in the two limiting cases of Gaussian and Lorentzian line shapes an approximation better than the one obtained by the steepest-descent method is successfully achieved. Various parameters that take into account the ratio of spontaneous to stimulated linewidths, the form factor depending on the linewidths of the inhomogeneous and homogeneous convoluted line shapes, and the population inversion fraction arise from the theory, giving the complete functional dependence for both the ASE photon flux and the gain–length product.
The dynamics of the co-operative. spontaneous emission· from many· two-level atoms is investigated by introducing a specific form of quasi-probability distribution which apparently excludes the vacuum fluctuation of the radiation field but includes the ·fluctuation of the atomic dipole moment. It is shown that the equation of motion for the random variables associated with the atom-field coupled system can be written in a quite classical form. As a result, the formula is derived for computing the multi-time correlation functions of the radi ation field-essential to its coherence properties-which generalizes Bonifacio, Schwendimann and Haake's adiabatic corresponding theorem. § 1. Introduction. The co-operative spontaneous emission (so-called superradiance) from an as sembly of many two-level atoms first discussed by Dicke in 1954n has been studied by many authors with different methods, roughly speaking, classicall/> and quantum mechanically. 3>-5> The classical approach, though simple, has a special significance for the dynamics of a large number of atoms participating in phase, and has succeeded except when the population of the atoms is completely inverted. The failure of the simple classical treatment in the case of complete inversion is due to the fact that the effect of spontaneous emission is not considered at all, so that emission is impossible from such a state as with no dipole moment.2>.s> Therefore, if one takes into account adequately the quantum fluctuation of the tdtal dipole moment which exists even when the atoms are fully excited, one should be able to describe the spontaneous emission from a classical point of view. This idea was suggested by Senitzky6> in a rather intuitive argument. In the present paper an attempt is made to formulate the above problem from a quasi-probability point of view. To this end we make here a particular choice of the representation of the quantum density operators (or quasi-probability. distri bution functions abbreviated by QPDF hereafter) among others7l-Io> by which the quantum mechanical equation of motion may be transformed into a form in an . associated c-number phase space, i.e., the yvell-known P-representation 9> of Glauber IS taken for the field variables and the so-~alled Q~representation based on the