Physical Review A

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Information theory and nonlinear quantal Hamiltonians’ ’’

G. Crespo, Araceli N. Proto, Angelo Plastino, D. Otero

Published Jun 1, 1990• 2 citations

Abstract

On the basis of some ideas introduced by Fern'andez in the preceding paper [Phys. Rev. A 41, 7066 (1990)], an alternative interpretation is given to the widely known nonlinear Hamiltonian of Albrecht, Hasse, and S"ussmann.

DOI: 10.1103/physreva.41.7068

Related papers

Information theory and nonlinear quantal Hamiltonians

G. Crespo, D. Otero, Angel Ricardo Plastino +1 more

Information-theory techniques are employed in order to deal with the dynamics of nonlinear quantal Hamiltonians. Some interesting new results are obtained that tend to dispel some widely shared notions concerning the Hamiltonian approach to quantal dissipation effects.

Physical Review AFeb 1, 198920 citations

Comment on ‘‘Information theory and nonlinear quantal Hamiltonians’’

Francisco Marcelo Fernández

A recently discussed Hamiltonian approach to dissipation effects is considered that leads to nonlinear equations for the time evolution of the expectation values of some operators. It is shown here that the Heisenberg equations of motion for the coordinate and momentum operators can be exactly solved, allowing a better study of the model.

Physical Review AJun 1, 19902 citations

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Density-matrix formulation ofab initiomethods of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics’ ’’

Antonio Redondo

A missing paragraph from the original work [A. Redondo, Phys. Rev. A 39, 4366 (1989] that is being commented upon [preceding paper, Cioslowski and Levy, Phys. Rev. A 40, 6727 (1989)] is included. The relationship between this work and a theorem by Lieb [E. Lieb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 457 (1981); 47, 69 (1981)] is also noted.

Physical Review ADec 1, 19892 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Cyclic quantum-evolution dependence on the Hamiltonian and geometrical phase’ ”

Lian-Ao Wu

I reply to the Comment [A. Mostafazadeh, Phys. Rev. A 55, 4640 (1997)] on my paper in Phys. Rev. A 53, 2053 (1996). In particular, there is nothing in the Comment except the final paragraph, which points out my two sick sentences in English. I give a simple example to explain my original meaning of the two sick English sentences and try to correct them.

Physical Review ASep 1, 19970 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Fermionic entanglement ambiguity in noninertial frames’ ”

Miguel Montero, Eduardo Martín-Martínez

We show that, contrary to the claims of the preceding Comment [Br\'adler and J\'auregui, Phys. Rev. A 85, 016301 (2012)], our original work [Phys. Rev. A 83, 062323 (2011)] is devoid of flaws or mistakes. We show that the criticism comes from a misunderstanding of part of our work.

arXiv:1108.6074Physical Review AJan 17, 201224 citations

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Quantum chaotic system in the generalized Husimi representation’ ’’

Karol Życzkowski

The interpretation of Milburn in the preceding Comment [Phys. Rev A 39, 2749 (1989)] is confirmed in further numerical study.Received 7 December 1987DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.39.2751©1989 American Physical Society

Physical Review AMar 1, 19891 citation