Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Letters A

Berry phase in multiphoton experiments

Давид Николаевич Клышко

Published Sep 1, 1989• 15 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/0375-9601(89)90539-2

Related papers

Observation of Quantum Interference as a Function of Berry’s Phase in a Complex Hadamard Optical Network

Anthony Laing, Thomas Lawson, Enrique Martín López +1 more

Emerging models of quantum computation driven by multiphoton quantum interference, while not universal, may offer an exponential advantage over classical computers for certain problems. Implementing these circuits via geometric phase gates could mitigate requirements for error correction to achieve fault tolerance while retaining their relative physical simplicity. We report an experiment in which a geometric phase is embedded in an optical network with no closed loops, enabling quantum interference between two photons as a function of the phase.

arXiv:1205.4740•Physical Review Letters•Jun 28, 2012•13 citations

The Relevance of Berry Phase in Quantum Physics

Pratul Bandyopadhyay

Statistical science and interdisciplinary research•Nov 1, 2009•0 citations

Experimental test of multiphoton theory

Emilio Panarella

Lettere al nuovo cimento della societa italiana di fisica/Lettere al nuovo cimento•Mar 1, 1972•12 citations

Lorentz-group Berry phases in squeezed light

R. Y. Chiao, Paul G. Kwiat, William A. Vareka +1 more

The Berry phases most often observed in experiments are produced by rotations. Berry phases produced by Lorentz transformations are almost as simple mathematically. They have been discussed at length, but there has been no suggestion of observing them in an experiment. Indeed, it has been shown that in one context they can be removed by a canonical transformation; thus they appear to be a property of the mathematical description that could not be observed physically. Here we show that the essential element of these Berry phases could be observed as a change of phase of the electromagnetic field in squeezed states of light or microwaves, as could be produced by degenerate parametric amplifiers. It could be seen as a fringe shift in interference experiments. In this way, a physical effect of the squeezing could be measured without measuring anything like photon statistics or noise.

Annual Meeting Optical Society of America•Jan 1, 1988•1 citation

Berry phase analogies in nonlinear optics

Paul Mandel, P. Galatola, L. A. Lugiato +1 more

Optics Communications•Jan 1, 1991•17 citations

ATOMIC OPTICS ANALOG OF THE PANCHARATNAM-BERRY PHASE

Estevan Nunez

In 1950, Ramsey and Hahn separately described a method using separated oscillatory magnetic fields and electronic levels to measure interference in atomic states. Today, similar physics is exploited to make atom interferometer sensors utilizing what is called the spin-echo sequence. In 1956, Pancharatnam described the geometric phase difference between two polarized states of light. In 1984 Berry described the phase accrued in cyclic and adiabatic quantum systems. A Pancharatnam-Berry phase experiment involving a quarter-wave – half-wave – quarter-wave plate stack of optics and an experiment using the spin-echo sequence are based on seemingly different phenomena in optics versus atomic optics, respectively. However, the mathematical representations used to describe the Pancharatnam-Berry phase in optics are identical to those used to describe the spin-echo sequence. Therefore, the relationship between the spin-echo sequence and the Pancharatnam-Berry phase was explored. Experiments to test the comparisons using a pre-existing cold atom experiment, ~150 μK, were performed. The mathematical connection between the two types of experiments was explained more deeply.

•Sep 1, 2025•0 citations
Emerging models of quantum computation driven by multiphoton quantum interference, while not universal, may offer an exponential advantage over classical computers for certain problems. Implementing these circuits via geometric phase gates could mitigate requirements for error correction to achieve fault tolerance while retaining their relative physical simplicity. We report an experiment in which a geometric phase is embedded in an optical network with no closed loops, enabling quantum interference between two photons as a function of the phase.
The Berry phases most often observed in experiments are produced by rotations. Berry phases produced by Lorentz transformations are almost as simple mathematically. They have been discussed at length, but there has been no suggestion of observing them in an experiment. Indeed, it has been shown that in one context they can be removed by a canonical transformation; thus they appear to be a property of the mathematical description that could not be observed physically. Here we show that the essential element of these Berry phases could be observed as a change of phase of the electromagnetic field in squeezed states of light or microwaves, as could be produced by degenerate parametric amplifiers. It could be seen as a fringe shift in interference experiments. In this way, a physical effect of the squeezing could be measured without measuring anything like photon statistics or noise.
In 1950, Ramsey and Hahn separately described a method using separated oscillatory magnetic fields and electronic levels to measure interference in atomic states. Today, similar physics is exploited to make atom interferometer sensors utilizing what is called the spin-echo sequence. In 1956, Pancharatnam described the geometric phase difference between two polarized states of light. In 1984 Berry described the phase accrued in cyclic and adiabatic quantum systems. A Pancharatnam-Berry phase experiment involving a quarter-wave – half-wave – quarter-wave plate stack of optics and an experiment using the spin-echo sequence are based on seemingly different phenomena in optics versus atomic optics, respectively. However, the mathematical representations used to describe the Pancharatnam-Berry phase in optics are identical to those used to describe the spin-echo sequence. Therefore, the relationship between the spin-echo sequence and the Pancharatnam-Berry phase was explored. Experiments to test the comparisons using a pre-existing cold atom experiment, ~150 μK, were performed. The mathematical connection between the two types of experiments was explained more deeply.