Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE

Indeterminatezza e realtà: i paradossi di Heisenberg nella cultura scientifica moderna

Roberto Vignera

Published Jan 1, 2015• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Considered one of the most extraordinary statements of modern physics, theHeisenberg Uncertainty Principle has had a great seductive power on scholarsof different disciplines. Its popularity, especially in the field of the social sciences,has been all the more striking as it related to a real transfiguration of itsimplications. In particular, its connection and conformity to the dictates ofcognitive relativism and to the simple interaction between observing and observedsystems.

DOI
10.3280/sr2014-105001

Related papers

Lo sfondo filosofico della fisica moderna

Werner Karl Heisenberg

Questa raccolta di saggi, inedita nella sua composizione e nuova in senso assoluto per l'Italia, presenta il pensiero di Heisenberg in tutta la sua articolazione e completezza: le riflessioni filosofiche fondamentali, le originali considerazioni epistemologiche, il credo etico-religioso, la visione della realtà e le due memorie scientifiche nelle quali venne elaborata la meccanica delle matrici, che fissò la nascita della cosiddetta «seconda quantistica», determinando la crisi della fisica classica e delineando l'orizzonte di senso da cui è derivato il successivo principio di indeterminazione. Emerge un pensatore che ha fornito contributi essenziali sia alla storia del pensiero filosofico che a quello scientifico del Novecento, e che ha rappresentato un vero e proprio «punto di svolta» della cultura contemporanea. Un punto di svolta che ha condotto il «metodo» della scienza dal gretto riduzionismo dell'epoca classica a una sua più concreta elaborazione in senso storicistico e complesso. Werner Heisenberg (Würzburg, 1901-Monaco, 1976) si è laureato a Monaco, nel 1924, con Arnold Sommerfeld. Nel 1925 si è trasferito a Gottinga, come assistente di Max Born. Risale a questo periodo la sua formulazione matematica della meccanica quantistica, la meccanica matriciale. Durante un soggiorno presso l'Istituto di Fisica teorica di Copenaghen diretto da Niels Bohr, Heisenberg enunciò, nella primavera del 1927, il principio di indeterminazione, che ha segnato la fine della concezione tradizionale della certezza scientifica e della casualità rigorosa. Nel 1932 ha ricevuto il Premio Nobel per la Fisica. Tra le sue opere pubblicate in Italia si ricordano: Fisica e filosofia (Milano, 1961), Mutamenti nelle basi della scienza (Torino, 1978), Oltre le frontiere della scienza (Roma, 1984), Indeterminazione e realtà (Napoli, 1991).

•Jan 1, 1999•5 citations

Il Principio di Indeterminazione di Heisenberg

Silvano Salvador

ll principio di indeterminazione di Werner Heisenberg, formulato nel 1927, rappresenta una delle pietre miliari nella storia della fisica moderna. Non si tratta semplicemente di una limitazione tecnica degli strumenti di misura, ma di una caratteristica intrinseca e fondamentale della natura stessa...

•Dec 27, 2025•0 citations

Uncertainty in the classroom—teaching quantum physics

K. E. Johansson, David Anthony Milstead

The teaching of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle provides one of those rare moments when science appears to contradict everyday life experiences, sparking the curiosity of the interested student. Written at a level appropriate for an able high school student, this article provides ideas for introducing the uncertainty principle and showing how it can be used to elucidate many topics in modern physics.

Physics Education•Feb 21, 2008•21 citations

Cognitive Aspects of the Heisenberg Principle

Vincent Edward Smith

COGNITIVE ASPECTS OF THE HEISENBERG PRINCIPLE I T HE Heisenberg uncertainty principle, like its rival theory of relativity/ has been one of the truly crucial phases in the physics of our day~ It did not, like the discovery of a new element or the Maxwell equations, simply indent the story of classical physics for a new paragraph. It was not only a new chapter but a new book. Detected, in the words of Heisenberg himself, when physics became self-critical, the principle is a statement of what is observable-like its contemporary, the theory of relativity. It was anew advance in method, so revolutionary indeed that physics has virtually lost meaning as content and become synonymous , as logical empiricism amply indicates, with mere rules of procedure. That science is developing into a system of logic, combining the Cartesian stress on clearness with the Kantian regulative idea, actually confirms a contention of traditional philosophy. It reveals that once we deny the colors and sounds, the life, lights, and purpose in our universe-as pure scientific method actually does-we are fated to deny much more than quality. Quality is in the order of form, substance, and being. The moment quality is banished from the real world, by the same 1 That all is not as peaceful and unified in physics as the layman sometimes believes can be seen in the deep cleavage between quantum and relativity mechanics. For the first, the exact specification of space (position) and time (velocity, momentum) has no meaning, while in relativity theory such exact description is the only meaning that can be had. Despite the efforts 'of leading physicists, including Dirac, to unite the two theories, the contradiction is so profound that one of these systems must eventually be abandoned or, more probably, both of them will be superseded. The recent work .of Schroedinger and apparently also of Einstei~ himself are directed to extend the general theory of relativity, making the current theory a special case just as Newtonian physics is a special case of present relativity mechanics. 474 COGNITIVE ASPECTS OF THE HEISENBERG PRINCIPLE 475 decree being itself-because it is an immediate, non-inertial (formal) thing like quality-is driven into its only possible exile, nothingness. It is not surprising then that, after modern physics· has finished its task, the universe should not only be emptied of its lights, its fragrance, its sweetness, and its music but should also be without being and without existence. The uncertainty principle has been much debated in modern thought. Its impact has brought a sad end to the pride of 19th century science since it prevents a complete knowledge of anything at all by shading into the darkness at least one of the two major factors that specify it. Shortly after the principle was born it was hailed by various authors as a proof of free will, of the possibility of religion, and of non-mechanistic concepts in biology. In a more consistent and challenging sense, it has often been taken to refute what the physicist calls causality and what the philosopher calls the order of nature. The fact of the matter is that if the senses alone supply knowledge, truly only one thing at a time can be apprehended. If Hume was right in philosophy, so is Heisenberg. But when sensism yields to an intellectual insight into reality, it is easy to refute the scientist's claim to dethrone the doctrine of nature's order which he could never detect, even in classical physics, by pointerreadings .2 But whatever the fate of the Heisenberg principle in cosmology , it has had a most fruitful career in the field of physics. To Heisenberg himself, the principle was a point of departure for an original development of quantum mechanics based on the " uncertainty " of position and momentum,.: 3 If, for example, measurements are made, under a microscope, of the position of an electron, the photon (light-particle), which impinges on the eye and thus conveys the required knowledge to the physicist, has had to collide with the electron, thus imparting an impact known as the Compton recoil. When • For ·a discussion of the order of nature, cf. J. Marling: The...

The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review•Jan 1, 1949•0 citations

COMPRENDERE LA FISICA QUANTISTICA: BREVE INTRODUZIONE PER PRINCIPIANTI

Angela Savasta, Salvatore Savasta

La fisica quantistica, rappresenta una delle maggiori scientifiche e culturali nella storia umana. Gran parte della moderna tecnologia e della nostra comprensione della realtà fisica si basano su di essa. La fisica quantistica rappresentò una reale rivoluzione culturale in quanto prevede un comportamento delle particelle che contraddice radicalmente il nostro modo di comprendere la realtà quotidiana e i presupposti su cui è stata fondata tutta la fisica precedente. Eppure, a distanza di un secolo dalla sua fondazione, a causa principalmente del formalismo matematico astratto e complesso su cui si basa, rimane per i non addetti ai lavori e per gli studenti di liceo qualcosa di misterioso e bizzarro. In questo lavoro illustriamo un approccio didattico, che prende spunto da recenti tentativi di riformulare questa teoria sulla base di principi fisici elementari. Tale approccio ha il vantaggio di non utilizzare il formalismo matematico degli spazi di Hibert e degli operatori Hermitiani, e di ricavare in modo intuitivo e ragionevole i concetti fondamentali di indeterminazione ed entanglement. Ci auguriamo che questo approccio possa contribuire ad una maggiore diffusione e comprensione di questo patrimonio scientifico e culturale.

International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology Revista INFAD de psicología•Jul 2, 2016•0 citations

Anti Heisenberg—The End of Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle

Ilija Barukčić

In contrast to many other physical theories, quantum mechanics is generally regarded as above any theory we have ever had and perhaps the best candidate for a universal and fundamental description of objective realty as such. Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle is not the only aspect of the conceptual difference between quantum and classical physics but is certainly one of the most important and famous aspects of quantum mechanics. As we will see, quantum mechanics as a theory and especially Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle challenges not only our imagination but violates some fundamental principles of classical logic as such. Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle is refuted.

Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics•Jan 1, 2016•8 citations
Considered one of the most extraordinary statements of modern physics, theHeisenberg Uncertainty Principle has had a great seductive power on scholarsof different disciplines. Its popularity, especially in the field of the social sciences,has been all the more striking as it related to a real transfiguration of itsimplications. In particular, its connection and conformity to the dictates ofcognitive relativism and to the simple interaction between observing and observedsystems.
Questa raccolta di saggi, inedita nella sua composizione e nuova in senso assoluto per l'Italia, presenta il pensiero di Heisenberg in tutta la sua articolazione e completezza: le riflessioni filosofiche fondamentali, le originali considerazioni epistemologiche, il credo etico-religioso, la visione della realtà e le due memorie scientifiche nelle quali venne elaborata la meccanica delle matrici, che fissò la nascita della cosiddetta «seconda quantistica», determinando la crisi della fisica classica e delineando l'orizzonte di senso da cui è derivato il successivo principio di indeterminazione. Emerge un pensatore che ha fornito contributi essenziali sia alla storia del pensiero filosofico che a quello scientifico del Novecento, e che ha rappresentato un vero e proprio «punto di svolta» della cultura contemporanea. Un punto di svolta che ha condotto il «metodo» della scienza dal gretto riduzionismo dell'epoca classica a una sua più concreta elaborazione in senso storicistico e complesso. Werner Heisenberg (Würzburg, 1901-Monaco, 1976) si è laureato a Monaco, nel 1924, con Arnold Sommerfeld. Nel 1925 si è trasferito a Gottinga, come assistente di Max Born. Risale a questo periodo la sua formulazione matematica della meccanica quantistica, la meccanica matriciale. Durante un soggiorno presso l'Istituto di Fisica teorica di Copenaghen diretto da Niels Bohr, Heisenberg enunciò, nella primavera del 1927, il principio di indeterminazione, che ha segnato la fine della concezione tradizionale della certezza scientifica e della casualità rigorosa. Nel 1932 ha ricevuto il Premio Nobel per la Fisica. Tra le sue opere pubblicate in Italia si ricordano: Fisica e filosofia (Milano, 1961), Mutamenti nelle basi della scienza (Torino, 1978), Oltre le frontiere della scienza (Roma, 1984), Indeterminazione e realtà (Napoli, 1991).
COGNITIVE ASPECTS OF THE HEISENBERG PRINCIPLE I T HE Heisenberg uncertainty principle, like its rival theory of relativity/ has been one of the truly crucial phases in the physics of our day~ It did not, like the discovery of a new element or the Maxwell equations, simply indent the story of classical physics for a new paragraph. It was not only a new chapter but a new book. Detected, in the words of Heisenberg himself, when physics became self-critical, the principle is a statement of what is observable-like its contemporary, the theory of relativity. It was anew advance in method, so revolutionary indeed that physics has virtually lost meaning as content and become synonymous , as logical empiricism amply indicates, with mere rules of procedure. That science is developing into a system of logic, combining the Cartesian stress on clearness with the Kantian regulative idea, actually confirms a contention of traditional philosophy. It reveals that once we deny the colors and sounds, the life, lights, and purpose in our universe-as pure scientific method actually does-we are fated to deny much more than quality. Quality is in the order of form, substance, and being. The moment quality is banished from the real world, by the same 1 That all is not as peaceful and unified in physics as the layman sometimes believes can be seen in the deep cleavage between quantum and relativity mechanics. For the first, the exact specification of space (position) and time (velocity, momentum) has no meaning, while in relativity theory such exact description is the only meaning that can be had. Despite the efforts 'of leading physicists, including Dirac, to unite the two theories, the contradiction is so profound that one of these systems must eventually be abandoned or, more probably, both of them will be superseded. The recent work .of Schroedinger and apparently also of Einstei~ himself are directed to extend the general theory of relativity, making the current theory a special case just as Newtonian physics is a special case of present relativity mechanics. 474 COGNITIVE ASPECTS OF THE HEISENBERG PRINCIPLE 475 decree being itself-because it is an immediate, non-inertial (formal) thing like quality-is driven into its only possible exile, nothingness. It is not surprising then that, after modern physics· has finished its task, the universe should not only be emptied of its lights, its fragrance, its sweetness, and its music but should also be without being and without existence. The uncertainty principle has been much debated in modern thought. Its impact has brought a sad end to the pride of 19th century science since it prevents a complete knowledge of anything at all by shading into the darkness at least one of the two major factors that specify it. Shortly after the principle was born it was hailed by various authors as a proof of free will, of the possibility of religion, and of non-mechanistic concepts in biology. In a more consistent and challenging sense, it has often been taken to refute what the physicist calls causality and what the philosopher calls the order of nature. The fact of the matter is that if the senses alone supply knowledge, truly only one thing at a time can be apprehended. If Hume was right in philosophy, so is Heisenberg. But when sensism yields to an intellectual insight into reality, it is easy to refute the scientist's claim to dethrone the doctrine of nature's order which he could never detect, even in classical physics, by pointerreadings .2 But whatever the fate of the Heisenberg principle in cosmology , it has had a most fruitful career in the field of physics. To Heisenberg himself, the principle was a point of departure for an original development of quantum mechanics based on the " uncertainty " of position and momentum,.: 3 If, for example, measurements are made, under a microscope, of the position of an electron, the photon (light-particle), which impinges on the eye and thus conveys the required knowledge to the physicist, has had to collide with the electron, thus imparting an impact known as the Compton recoil. When • For ·a discussion of the order of nature, cf. J. Marling: The...
La fisica quantistica, rappresenta una delle maggiori scientifiche e culturali nella storia umana. Gran parte della moderna tecnologia e della nostra comprensione della realtà fisica si basano su di essa. La fisica quantistica rappresentò una reale rivoluzione culturale in quanto prevede un comportamento delle particelle che contraddice radicalmente il nostro modo di comprendere la realtà quotidiana e i presupposti su cui è stata fondata tutta la fisica precedente. Eppure, a distanza di un secolo dalla sua fondazione, a causa principalmente del formalismo matematico astratto e complesso su cui si basa, rimane per i non addetti ai lavori e per gli studenti di liceo qualcosa di misterioso e bizzarro. In questo lavoro illustriamo un approccio didattico, che prende spunto da recenti tentativi di riformulare questa teoria sulla base di principi fisici elementari. Tale approccio ha il vantaggio di non utilizzare il formalismo matematico degli spazi di Hibert e degli operatori Hermitiani, e di ricavare in modo intuitivo e ragionevole i concetti fondamentali di indeterminazione ed entanglement. Ci auguriamo che questo approccio possa contribuire ad una maggiore diffusione e comprensione di questo patrimonio scientifico e culturale.
In contrast to many other physical theories, quantum mechanics is generally regarded as above any theory we have ever had and perhaps the best candidate for a universal and fundamental description of objective realty as such. Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle is not the only aspect of the conceptual difference between quantum and classical physics but is certainly one of the most important and famous aspects of quantum mechanics. As we will see, quantum mechanics as a theory and especially Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle challenges not only our imagination but violates some fundamental principles of classical logic as such. Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle is refuted.