Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Letters A

Range of violations of Bell's inequality by entangled photon pairs

Frederick M. Kronz

Published Feb 1, 2001• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/s0375-9601(00)00831-8

Related papers

Bell inequality violations by partially entangled spin- pairs

Kirk McDermid

Physics Letters A•Aug 5, 2004•0 citations

Range of Violations of Bell's Inequality by Entangled Photon Pairs Entangled Photon Pairs

Fred Kronz

If the quantum states of measured pairs are entangled, then there are triplets of experimental configurations for which Bell's original inequality is violated. This paper gives a concise characterization of the entire range of possible triplets of polarization measurements on entangled photon pairs for which the inequality is violated.

•Oct 1, 2000•0 citations

Experimental Proof That Bell’s Inequality Cannot Falsify Local Realism, Together with Corresponding Cause Analysis and Conjectures

Ting Zhou

Conventional tests of Bell’s inequality rely on entangled photon pairs. Here, we replace entangled pairs with two independent photons of orthogonal polarization, and demonstrate that Bell’s inequality is still violated. Given the inherent local realism of independent photons, this experiment proves that Bell’s inequality cannot falsify the local realism of photons. We thus conjecture that the violation of Bell’s inequality by entangled photon pairs originates from their orthogonal polarizations, rather than the breakdown of local realism. To interpret this unexpected violation with independent photons, we further substitute the two photons with two monochromatic light beams, and calculate the transmittance correlation through polarizers via Malus’s law and Karl Pearson’s correlation formula. We show that this correlation also defies Bell’s inequality. Retracing the derivation of Bell’s inequality reveals its validity is restricted to binary events, which accounts for the observed violation with light beams. Finally, we propose a thought experiment involving gradual attenuation of light intensity down to the single-photon regime, and hypothesize that single-photon transmission through a polarizer does not constitute a binary event. This hypothesis provides a unified interpretation for both our experimental findings and all canonical Bell inequality tests reported to date.

Quantum Reports•Apr 25, 2026•0 citations

Proposed Bell's inequality test using entangled photon holes

Liang Liang, Franson, Pittman

Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations

Violation of Bell's inequality with continuous spatial variables

Ayman F. Abouraddy, Timothy M. Yarnall, Bahaa E. A. Saleh +1 more

We demonstrate an approach to violating Bell's inequality with the continuous spatial variables of entangled-photon pairs using simple optical components that manipulate the spatial parity of the transverse coordinate in one dimension.

Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics•May 1, 2007•0 citations

Violation of bell's inequalities with a local theory of photons

Patrick Suppes, J. Acacio de Barros, Adonai S. Sant'Anna

arXiv:quant-ph/9606020•Foundations of Physics Letters•Dec 1, 1996•6 citations
Conventional tests of Bell’s inequality rely on entangled photon pairs. Here, we replace entangled pairs with two independent photons of orthogonal polarization, and demonstrate that Bell’s inequality is still violated. Given the inherent local realism of independent photons, this experiment proves that Bell’s inequality cannot falsify the local realism of photons. We thus conjecture that the violation of Bell’s inequality by entangled photon pairs originates from their orthogonal polarizations, rather than the breakdown of local realism. To interpret this unexpected violation with independent photons, we further substitute the two photons with two monochromatic light beams, and calculate the transmittance correlation through polarizers via Malus’s law and Karl Pearson’s correlation formula. We show that this correlation also defies Bell’s inequality. Retracing the derivation of Bell’s inequality reveals its validity is restricted to binary events, which accounts for the observed violation with light beams. Finally, we propose a thought experiment involving gradual attenuation of light intensity down to the single-photon regime, and hypothesize that single-photon transmission through a polarizer does not constitute a binary event. This hypothesis provides a unified interpretation for both our experimental findings and all canonical Bell inequality tests reported to date.