© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

Terms Privacy Legal Notice

Quantum Reports

Experimental Proof That Bell’s Inequality Cannot Falsify Local Realism, Together with Corresponding Cause Analysis and Conjectures

Ting Zhou

Published Apr 25, 2026• 0 citations

Abstract

Conventional tests of Bell’s inequality rely on entangled photon pairs. Here, we replace entangled pairs with two independent photons of orthogonal polarization, and demonstrate that Bell’s inequality is still violated. Given the inherent local realism of independent photons, this experiment proves that Bell’s inequality cannot falsify the local realism of photons. We thus conjecture that the violation of Bell’s inequality by entangled photon pairs originates from their orthogonal polarizations, rather than the breakdown of local realism. To interpret this unexpected violation with independent photons, we further substitute the two photons with two monochromatic light beams, and calculate the transmittance correlation through polarizers via Malus’s law and Karl Pearson’s correlation formula. We show that this correlation also defies Bell’s inequality. Retracing the derivation of Bell’s inequality reveals its validity is restricted to binary events, which accounts for the observed violation with light beams. Finally, we propose a thought experiment involving gradual attenuation of light intensity down to the single-photon regime, and hypothesize that single-photon transmission through a polarizer does not constitute a binary event. This hypothesis provides a unified interpretation for both our experimental findings and all canonical Bell inequality tests reported to date.

DOI: 10.3390/quantum8020039

Related papers

A Re-examination of Bell's Inequality: Polarization Correspondence in Entangled Photon Pairs

Jingyuan Guo

Bell's inequality is widely regarded as the death knell of local hidden variable theories. However, this paper points out that Bell's argument implicitly relies on an overly narrow assumption about what constitutes a "local hidden variable"—namely, that hidden variables must assign measurement outcomes to each particle independently at the moment of measurement. This paper proposes that the deterministic correspondence established between entangled particles at the moment of their creation, and determined by initial conditions, can itself serve as a local hidden variable. As long as the polarization direction of the photons is not altered, this correspondence persists indefinitely. It is independent of whether a measurement is performed, and requires no superluminal communication to sustain. From this perspective, quantum entanglement experiments do not violate special relativity; the violation of Bell's inequality merely rules out a specific class of hidden variable models, not all forms of local realism.

•Aug 18, 2026•0 citations

Violation of Bell inequality with unentangled photons

Kai Wang, Zhaohua Hou, Kaiyi Qian +6 more

Violation of local realism via Bell inequality-a profound and counterintuitive manifestation of quantum theory that conflicts with the prediction of local realism-is viewed to be intimately linked with quantum entanglement. Experimental demonstrations of such a phenomenon using quantum entangled states are among the landmark experiments of modern physics and paved the way for quantum technology. Here, we report the violation of the Bell inequality that cannot be described by quantum entanglement in the system but arises from quantum indistinguishability by path identity, shown by the multiphoton frustrated interference. By analyzing the measurement of four-photon frustrated interference within the standard Bell-test formalism, we find a violation of Bell inequality by more than four SDs. Our work establishes a connection between quantum correlation and quantum indistinguishability, providing insights into the fundamental origin of the counterintuitive characteristics observed in quantum physics.

arXiv:2507.07756•Science Advances•Aug 1, 2025•9 citations

Testing the Deviation of Single-Side Polarization State of Entangled Photons from Malus' Law: A Decisive Experimental Scheme Based on Coincidence Measurement

Jingyuan Guo

Bell inequality experiments have demonstrated that quantum entanglement violates the predictions of local realism. However, all Bell experiments are based on joint measurements of two photons, and their analysis implicitly assumes that "the polarization state of a single photon is ideally linear." This paper proposes an experimental scheme to directly test this assumption: using type-II spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC) to generate polarization-entangled photon pairs, employing fixed-angle measurement of the e-light channel as a coincidence gate to filter entangled photons in the o-light channel, then scanning the o-light analyzer angle with high precision to measure the coincidence count rate as a function of the analyzer angle, testing whether it strictly follows Malus' law I(\theta)=I_0\cos^2(\theta-\theta_0). If systematic deviation is observed in the curve, it would indicate the existence of asymmetric secondary polarization structures in the polarization state of entangled photons, providing an alternative explanatory pathway for Bell inequality violation distinct from nonlocality. This experiment employs a high-precision coincidence measurement scheme to ensure statistical significance and designs multiple control experiments to eliminate systematic errors. The experiment can be implemented in laboratories equipped with standard quantum optics equipment.

•Aug 24, 2026•0 citations

Bell violations with entangled and non-entangled optical fields

J. Gonzales, P. Sánchez, V. Avalos +1 more

Abstract We report Bell violations with classical light prepared in both entangled and non-entangled polarization-path, binary states. Our results show that violations of constraints such as the Bell–Clauser–Horn–Shimony–Holt inequality do not necessarily falsify local realism. Correlations in the realm of classical statistical optics, which are not of the Bell type, may lead to Bell violations.

arXiv:2001.05886•Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics•Mar 13, 2019•1 citation

A Local Realistic Explanation of the Violation of Bell’s Inequality via Photon Phases

M. Morimoto

We show that the violation of Bell's inequalities in photon entanglement experiments can be derived to yield the exact same results based on local realism without long-range correlations, using only elementary formulas for interference fringes. The mathematics employed in this paper is limited solely to basic trigonometric identities, requiring no special assumptions or definitions whatsoever.

IEEE Photonics Technology Letters•Oct 8, 2026•0 citations

Entanglement, Space–Time Coordinates, and Bell's Inequalities in Photon–Polarization Experiments

K. Hess, Jürgen Jakumeit

ABSTRACT This work presents a revised analysis and corresponding perspective of Bell‐type inequalities and their connection to entanglement in polarization experiments with single‐photon resolution. It is argued that standard derivations of Bell‐type inequalities implicitly rely on additional assumptions beyond those originally stated, specifically concerning the cardinalities of the sets of measurements and the sets of photon‐pair properties (Einstein's elements of physical reality, Bell's ). Any model‐based averages must depend on these cardinalities and violations of Bell‐type inequalities become possible for certain ranges of them. In addition, we argue that for Aspect‐type experiments, the statistical properties associated with Bell's (hidden variable) λ can be different before and after actual photon‐transmission through the polarizers. This distinction is particularly necessary for the actual equipment used in the Aspect‐type experiments. Building on these observations, we construct a model based on a consistent evaluation of the measurement events relative to each other. The model reproduces all quantum‐mechanical expectation values for polarization correlations without invoking instantaneous influences at a distance, and additionally yields explicit outcomes for individual photon‐pair measurements. Within this framework, our Einstein‐type Global Space‐Time Model (GSTM) accounts also for polarization correlations in Malus‐type experiments and addresses all commonly discussed paradoxes associated with single‐photon measurements.

Annalen der Physik•Sep 1, 2026•0 citations

Conventional tests of Bell’s inequality rely on entangled photon pairs. Here, we replace entangled pairs with two independent photons of orthogonal polarization, and demonstrate that Bell’s inequality is still violated. Given the inherent local realism of independent photons, this experiment proves that Bell’s inequality cannot falsify the local realism of photons. We thus conjecture that the violation of Bell’s inequality by entangled photon pairs originates from their orthogonal polarizations, rather than the breakdown of local realism. To interpret this unexpected violation with independent photons, we further substitute the two photons with two monochromatic light beams, and calculate the transmittance correlation through polarizers via Malus’s law and Karl Pearson’s correlation formula. We show that this correlation also defies Bell’s inequality. Retracing the derivation of Bell’s inequality reveals its validity is restricted to binary events, which accounts for the observed violation with light beams. Finally, we propose a thought experiment involving gradual attenuation of light intensity down to the single-photon regime, and hypothesize that single-photon transmission through a polarizer does not constitute a binary event. This hypothesis provides a unified interpretation for both our experimental findings and all canonical Bell inequality tests reported to date.

Bell's inequality is widely regarded as the death knell of local hidden variable theories. However, this paper points out that Bell's argument implicitly relies on an overly narrow assumption about what constitutes a "local hidden variable"—namely, that hidden variables must assign measurement outcomes to each particle independently at the moment of measurement. This paper proposes that the deterministic correspondence established between entangled particles at the moment of their creation, and determined by initial conditions, can itself serve as a local hidden variable. As long as the polarization direction of the photons is not altered, this correspondence persists indefinitely. It is independent of whether a measurement is performed, and requires no superluminal communication to sustain. From this perspective, quantum entanglement experiments do not violate special relativity; the violation of Bell's inequality merely rules out a specific class of hidden variable models, not all forms of local realism.

Violation of local realism via Bell inequality-a profound and counterintuitive manifestation of quantum theory that conflicts with the prediction of local realism-is viewed to be intimately linked with quantum entanglement. Experimental demonstrations of such a phenomenon using quantum entangled states are among the landmark experiments of modern physics and paved the way for quantum technology. Here, we report the violation of the Bell inequality that cannot be described by quantum entanglement in the system but arises from quantum indistinguishability by path identity, shown by the multiphoton frustrated interference. By analyzing the measurement of four-photon frustrated interference within the standard Bell-test formalism, we find a violation of Bell inequality by more than four SDs. Our work establishes a connection between quantum correlation and quantum indistinguishability, providing insights into the fundamental origin of the counterintuitive characteristics observed in quantum physics.

Bell inequality experiments have demonstrated that quantum entanglement violates the predictions of local realism. However, all Bell experiments are based on joint measurements of two photons, and their analysis implicitly assumes that "the polarization state of a single photon is ideally linear." This paper proposes an experimental scheme to directly test this assumption: using type-II spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC) to generate polarization-entangled photon pairs, employing fixed-angle measurement of the e-light channel as a coincidence gate to filter entangled photons in the o-light channel, then scanning the o-light analyzer angle with high precision to measure the coincidence count rate as a function of the analyzer angle, testing whether it strictly follows Malus' law I(\theta)=I_0\cos^2(\theta-\theta_0). If systematic deviation is observed in the curve, it would indicate the existence of asymmetric secondary polarization structures in the polarization state of entangled photons, providing an alternative explanatory pathway for Bell inequality violation distinct from nonlocality. This experiment employs a high-precision coincidence measurement scheme to ensure statistical significance and designs multiple control experiments to eliminate systematic errors. The experiment can be implemented in laboratories equipped with standard quantum optics equipment.

ABSTRACT This work presents a revised analysis and corresponding perspective of Bell‐type inequalities and their connection to entanglement in polarization experiments with single‐photon resolution. It is argued that standard derivations of Bell‐type inequalities implicitly rely on additional assumptions beyond those originally stated, specifically concerning the cardinalities of the sets of measurements and the sets of photon‐pair properties (Einstein's elements of physical reality, Bell's ). Any model‐based averages must depend on these cardinalities and violations of Bell‐type inequalities become possible for certain ranges of them. In addition, we argue that for Aspect‐type experiments, the statistical properties associated with Bell's (hidden variable) λ can be different before and after actual photon‐transmission through the polarizers. This distinction is particularly necessary for the actual equipment used in the Aspect‐type experiments. Building on these observations, we construct a model based on a consistent evaluation of the measurement events relative to each other. The model reproduces all quantum‐mechanical expectation values for polarization correlations without invoking instantaneous influences at a distance, and additionally yields explicit outcomes for individual photon‐pair measurements. Within this framework, our Einstein‐type Global Space‐Time Model (GSTM) accounts also for polarization correlations in Malus‐type experiments and addresses all commonly discussed paradoxes associated with single‐photon measurements.