Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Theoretical Physics

Conditional probabilities with a quantal and a kolmogorovian limit

Sven Aerts

Published Nov 1, 1996• 12 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf02302444

Related papers

Classical (Kolmogorovian) and Quantum (Born) Probability

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Springer eBooks•Dec 31, 2009•0 citations

“Quantal” Behavior in Classical Probability

K. A. Kirkpatrick

arXiv:quant-ph/0106072•Foundations of Physics Letters•Jun 1, 2003•48 citations

Kolmogorov-type conditional probabilities among distinct contexts

Karl Svozil

•Mar 1, 2019•3 citations

Kolmogorovian versus Non-Kolmogorovian Probabilities in Contextual Theories

Claudio Garola

Most scholars maintain that quantum mechanics (QM) is a contextual theory and that quantum probability does not allow for an epistemic (ignorance) interpretation. By inquiring possible connections between contextuality and non-classical probabilities we show that a class TμMP of theories can be selected in which probabilities are introduced as classical averages of Kolmogorovian probabilities over sets of (microscopic) contexts, which endows them with an epistemic interpretation. The conditions characterizing TμMP are compatible with classical mechanics (CM), statistical mechanics (SM), and QM, hence we assume that these theories belong to TμMP. In the case of CM and SM, this assumption is irrelevant, as all of the notions introduced in them as members of TμMP reduce to standard notions. In the case of QM, it leads to interpret quantum probability as a derived notion in a Kolmogorovian framework, explains why it is non-Kolmogorovian, and provides it with an epistemic interpretation. These results were anticipated in a previous paper, but they are obtained here in a general framework without referring to individual objects, which shows that they hold, even if only a minimal (statistical) interpretation of QM is adopted in order to avoid the problems following from the standard quantum theory of measurement.

arXiv:1911.02481•Entropy•Jan 18, 2021•2 citations

Quantum probabilities, Kolmogorov probabilities, and informational probabilities

Mioara Mugur-Schächter

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Jan 1, 1994•3 citations

Borderlines between classical and non-classical probabilities

Enrico G. Beltrametti

The paper deals with the characterization of conditions able to decide whether some set of observed probabilities admits a representation within a classical Kolmogorovian model. The conditions proposed in the sixties by J. Bell, which are violated in quantum contexts, are discussed in more general frames.

P-Adic Numbers Ultrametric Analysis and Applications•Oct 1, 2015•1 citation
Most scholars maintain that quantum mechanics (QM) is a contextual theory and that quantum probability does not allow for an epistemic (ignorance) interpretation. By inquiring possible connections between contextuality and non-classical probabilities we show that a class TμMP of theories can be selected in which probabilities are introduced as classical averages of Kolmogorovian probabilities over sets of (microscopic) contexts, which endows them with an epistemic interpretation. The conditions characterizing TμMP are compatible with classical mechanics (CM), statistical mechanics (SM), and QM, hence we assume that these theories belong to TμMP. In the case of CM and SM, this assumption is irrelevant, as all of the notions introduced in them as members of TμMP reduce to standard notions. In the case of QM, it leads to interpret quantum probability as a derived notion in a Kolmogorovian framework, explains why it is non-Kolmogorovian, and provides it with an epistemic interpretation. These results were anticipated in a previous paper, but they are obtained here in a general framework without referring to individual objects, which shows that they hold, even if only a minimal (statistical) interpretation of QM is adopted in order to avoid the problems following from the standard quantum theory of measurement.