Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Physical meaning of the photon wave function

Toshio Inagaki

Published Mar 1, 1998• 10 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Recently, the author [Phys. Rev. A 49, 2839 (1994)] proposed a quantum-mechanical theory of a photon, in which negative energy states can be dismissed from physical photon states without causing any difficulties. In this Brief Report the physical meaning of a photon wave function is investigated more precisely. The interpretation of a photon wave function as a probability amplitude is guaranteed by requiring the coarse-grained condition that the linear dimensions of a volume or a surface concerned in the configuration space are large compared to the photon wavelengths. The calculation made here is essentially based on that presented by Mandel [Phys. Rev. 144, 1071 (1966)] in his analysis of the photon number operator. But our calculation includes that of Mandel as the zeroth-order approximation. As a result, it is shown that although the position operator ◯ in the ordinary quantum mechanics be considered a correct photon operator strictly cannot, it becomes meaningful to some extent under the coarse-grained condition. In connection with ◯, we also examine the velocity operator $[\mathbf{◯},\ifmmode \hat{H}\else \^{H}\fi{}]/i\ensuremath{\Elzxh}$ ($\ifmmode \hat{H}\else \^{H}\fi{}$ is the photon Hamiltonian), and show that the probability current density is definable under the coarse-grained condition.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.57.2204

Related papers

Quantum-mechanical approach to a free photon

Toshio Inagaki

The photon dynamics proposed by Cook [Phys. Rev. A 25, 2164 (1982); 26, 2754 (1982)] is reformulated in terms of conventional quantum mechanics. Here, the subject is confined to a photon in vacuum. The photon density D(x,t) and photon current density C(x,t) in the Cook theory are here regarded as the probability density and probability current density of a single photon, respectively. A wave function \ensuremath{\Psi} for a photon is defined by a 6\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}1 column matrix ${(}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\psi}}}$) where \ensuremath{\psi} and \ensuremath{\varphi} correspond to the photon vector fields of the Cook theory. The Schr\"odinger equation for \ensuremath{\Psi} is easily obtained from equations of photon fields \ensuremath{\psi} and \ensuremath{\varphi} and the Hamiltonian form is determined as the time-evolution operator. By this reformulation, negative-frequency solutions were shown not to be physical and need not be considered for a physical photon. This explains why, in the Cook theory, they are dismissed from plane-wave expansions of photon fields \ensuremath{\psi} and \ensuremath{\varphi}.

Physical Review A•Apr 1, 1994•48 citations

Photon wave mechanics and position eigenvectors

Margaret Hawton

One and two photon wave functions are derived by projecting the quantum state vector onto simultaneous eigenvectors of the number operator and a recently constructed photon position operator [Phys. Rev. A 59, 954 (1999)] that couples spin and orbital angular momentum. While only the Landau-Peierls wave function defines a positive definite photon density, a similarity transformation to a biorthogonal field-potential pair of positive frequency solutions of Maxwell's equations preserves eigenvalues and expectation values. We show that this real space description of photons is compatible with all of the usual rules of quantum mechanics and provides a framework for understanding the relationships amongst different forms of the photon wave function in the literature. It also gives a quantum picture of the optical angular momentum of beams that applies to both one photon and coherent states. According to the rules of quantum mechanics, this wave function gives the probability to count a photon at any position in space.

arXiv:0705.3196•Physical Review A•Jun 15, 2007•36 citations

Operator of Photon Density in the Phase Space

O. O. Chumak, N. Sushkova

The possibility to describe the evolution of an electromagnetic field by means of the photon distribution function in the phase space (r, q-space) is studied. This function defined by analogy with the coarse-grained Mandel operator of photon density in the configuration space is used to characterize the local density of photons with a given momentum. Approximate eigenfunctions and eigenvalues of the distribution function, corresponding to one-photon localized states of the electromagnetic field, are obtained. It is shown that the photon transport is governed by the Newton mechanics if the "external force" acting on photons is a slowly varying function of spatial variables. It is shown that the distribution function at any time can be expressed via the initialdistribution and photon's trajectories.

Ukrainian Journal of Physics•Jan 30, 2012•7 citations

Quantum-mechanical description of a photon in refractive mediums and momentum operator

Toshio Inagaki

A quantum-mechanical description of a photon in refractive mediums is proposed. Here we assume that the medium is isotropic and linear, and the material constants (the dielectric constant and permeability) are both the functions of the position coordinates only and dispersionless. It is found that the momentum operator is generally ill defined as well as the position operator. The momentum operator, however, becomes approximately well defined when the extents of the appreciable changes of the material constants are very large compared to the photon wavelengths. Then, it is shown that the various expressions of the physical quantities in the classical electromagnetic theory, such as the energy and momentum, can be obtained from the expectation values of the corresponding operators. The Abraham-Minkowski controversy in the classical electromagnetic theory is glanced from the viewpoint of our quantum-mechanical approach.

Il Nuovo Cimento B•Apr 1, 2003•0 citations

Photon Wave Mechanics

Zhiyong Wang, Cai-Dong Xiong, Ole Keller

In contrast to wave functions in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics interpreted as probability amplitudes, wave functions in relativistic quantum mechanics have generalized meanings such as charge-density amplitudes, energy-density amplitudes as well as particle-number density amplitudes, etc. Applying electromagnetic field intensities we construct a photon wave function, it corresponds to the (1,0)+(0,1) spinor representation of the electromagnetic field, and can be interpreted as the energy-density amplitude of photons outside a source. In terms of photon wave functions we develop photon wave mechanics, which provides us with a new quantum-mechanical description for photons outside a source.

arXiv:quant-ph/0511181•Nov 18, 2005•0 citations

Coordinate measurements and operators

Arthur A. Broyles

Abstract Relativistic quantum‐field theory provides the machinery for calculating wave functions or probability amplitudes depending upon space‐time coordinates. The currently accepted theory, however, fails to provide position operators and a means of measuring particle coordinates that are consistent with Dirac's properties of physical observables. This is because it calls for a space position probability distribution at a specified time. This paper shows, however, that space‐time event coordinate operators, together with a corresponding measurement procedure, can be found that are consistent with Dirac's requirements. This is done through a reinterpretation of the amplitudes computed by field theory and does not involve any change in that mathematical formalism. The measurement of the space‐time coordinates of an event is accomplished by detecting the absorption of a photon by a particle from each of two light pulses designed to overlap at a given point at a given time. If a final emitted photon has an energy whose sum with the final particle energy approximately equals the sum of the mean energies of the pulses, then the absorption of the two pulse photons must certainly have taken place within a distance the order of a Compton wavelength of the small space‐time region of overlapping pulses. This is clear from the fact that the high energy required to confine the pulses to very small volumes must throw a particle absorbing them far off the mass shell. Thus the absorption of the two photons throws the particle into a narrowly confined spatial wave function that must decay extremely rapidly—to within a Compton wavelength, a delta function in space‐time. This delta function is the eigenfunction of space‐time coordinate operators Xμ and is the scalar product of vectors in a Hilbert space spanned by spin–space‐time kets large enough to contain the operators of the Poincaré group. These event operators transform properly under the action of Poincaré operators but do not commute with the mass. If the Compton wavelength is not negligible compared to the accuracy desired in the coordinate measurements, individual coordinate measurements are no longer possible. Nevertheless, a large number of repeated coordinate measurements can be carried out to produce a coordinate probability distribution. This distribution can be unfolded to find a true coordinate probability distribution if the charge form factor is known from basic theory. An analysis of laboratory particle detection techniques shows that they actually determine space coordinates and energy rather than spatial coordinates at a given time. When this fact is included, the Klein–Nishina formula can be derived using the electromagnetic four‐vector potential as the photon probability amplitude wave. To clarify the meaning of the observables, a mass‐momentum measurement is described.

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Jan 1, 1980•4 citations
Recently, the author [Phys. Rev. A 49, 2839 (1994)] proposed a quantum-mechanical theory of a photon, in which negative energy states can be dismissed from physical photon states without causing any difficulties. In this Brief Report the physical meaning of a photon wave function is investigated more precisely. The interpretation of a photon wave function as a probability amplitude is guaranteed by requiring the coarse-grained condition that the linear dimensions of a volume or a surface concerned in the configuration space are large compared to the photon wavelengths. The calculation made here is essentially based on that presented by Mandel [Phys. Rev. 144, 1071 (1966)] in his analysis of the photon number operator. But our calculation includes that of Mandel as the zeroth-order approximation. As a result, it is shown that although the position operator ◯ in the ordinary quantum mechanics be considered a correct photon operator strictly cannot, it becomes meaningful to some extent under the coarse-grained condition. In connection with ◯, we also examine the velocity operator [◯,\ifmmodeH^\elseHˆ\fi]/i\ensuremath\Elzxh[\mathbf{◯},\ifmmode \hat{H}\else \^{H}\fi{}]/i\ensuremath{\Elzxh}[◯,\ifmmodeH^\elseHˆ\fi]/i\ensuremath\Elzxh (\ifmmodeH^\elseHˆ\fi\ifmmode \hat{H}\else \^{H}\fi{}\ifmmodeH^\elseHˆ\fi is the photon Hamiltonian), and show that the probability current density is definable under the coarse-grained condition.
The photon dynamics proposed by Cook [Phys. Rev. A 25, 2164 (1982); 26, 2754 (1982)] is reformulated in terms of conventional quantum mechanics. Here, the subject is confined to a photon in vacuum. The photon density D(x,t) and photon current density C(x,t) in the Cook theory are here regarded as the probability density and probability current density of a single photon, respectively. A wave function \ensuremath{\Psi} for a photon is defined by a 6\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}1 column matrix ${(}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\psi}}}$) where \ensuremath{\psi} and \ensuremath{\varphi} correspond to the photon vector fields of the Cook theory. The Schr\"odinger equation for \ensuremath{\Psi} is easily obtained from equations of photon fields \ensuremath{\psi} and \ensuremath{\varphi} and the Hamiltonian form is determined as the time-evolution operator. By this reformulation, negative-frequency solutions were shown not to be physical and need not be considered for a physical photon. This explains why, in the Cook theory, they are dismissed from plane-wave expansions of photon fields \ensuremath{\psi} and \ensuremath{\varphi}.
One and two photon wave functions are derived by projecting the quantum state vector onto simultaneous eigenvectors of the number operator and a recently constructed photon position operator [Phys. Rev. A 59, 954 (1999)] that couples spin and orbital angular momentum. While only the Landau-Peierls wave function defines a positive definite photon density, a similarity transformation to a biorthogonal field-potential pair of positive frequency solutions of Maxwell's equations preserves eigenvalues and expectation values. We show that this real space description of photons is compatible with all of the usual rules of quantum mechanics and provides a framework for understanding the relationships amongst different forms of the photon wave function in the literature. It also gives a quantum picture of the optical angular momentum of beams that applies to both one photon and coherent states. According to the rules of quantum mechanics, this wave function gives the probability to count a photon at any position in space.
The possibility to describe the evolution of an electromagnetic field by means of the photon distribution function in the phase space (r, q-space) is studied. This function defined by analogy with the coarse-grained Mandel operator of photon density in the configuration space is used to characterize the local density of photons with a given momentum. Approximate eigenfunctions and eigenvalues of the distribution function, corresponding to one-photon localized states of the electromagnetic field, are obtained. It is shown that the photon transport is governed by the Newton mechanics if the "external force" acting on photons is a slowly varying function of spatial variables. It is shown that the distribution function at any time can be expressed via the initialdistribution and photon's trajectories.
A quantum-mechanical description of a photon in refractive mediums is proposed. Here we assume that the medium is isotropic and linear, and the material constants (the dielectric constant and permeability) are both the functions of the position coordinates only and dispersionless. It is found that the momentum operator is generally ill defined as well as the position operator. The momentum operator, however, becomes approximately well defined when the extents of the appreciable changes of the material constants are very large compared to the photon wavelengths. Then, it is shown that the various expressions of the physical quantities in the classical electromagnetic theory, such as the energy and momentum, can be obtained from the expectation values of the corresponding operators. The Abraham-Minkowski controversy in the classical electromagnetic theory is glanced from the viewpoint of our quantum-mechanical approach.
In contrast to wave functions in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics interpreted as probability amplitudes, wave functions in relativistic quantum mechanics have generalized meanings such as charge-density amplitudes, energy-density amplitudes as well as particle-number density amplitudes, etc. Applying electromagnetic field intensities we construct a photon wave function, it corresponds to the (1,0)+(0,1) spinor representation of the electromagnetic field, and can be interpreted as the energy-density amplitude of photons outside a source. In terms of photon wave functions we develop photon wave mechanics, which provides us with a new quantum-mechanical description for photons outside a source.
Abstract Relativistic quantum‐field theory provides the machinery for calculating wave functions or probability amplitudes depending upon space‐time coordinates. The currently accepted theory, however, fails to provide position operators and a means of measuring particle coordinates that are consistent with Dirac's properties of physical observables. This is because it calls for a space position probability distribution at a specified time. This paper shows, however, that space‐time event coordinate operators, together with a corresponding measurement procedure, can be found that are consistent with Dirac's requirements. This is done through a reinterpretation of the amplitudes computed by field theory and does not involve any change in that mathematical formalism. The measurement of the space‐time coordinates of an event is accomplished by detecting the absorption of a photon by a particle from each of two light pulses designed to overlap at a given point at a given time. If a final emitted photon has an energy whose sum with the final particle energy approximately equals the sum of the mean energies of the pulses, then the absorption of the two pulse photons must certainly have taken place within a distance the order of a Compton wavelength of the small space‐time region of overlapping pulses. This is clear from the fact that the high energy required to confine the pulses to very small volumes must throw a particle absorbing them far off the mass shell. Thus the absorption of the two photons throws the particle into a narrowly confined spatial wave function that must decay extremely rapidly—to within a Compton wavelength, a delta function in space‐time. This delta function is the eigenfunction of space‐time coordinate operators Xμ and is the scalar product of vectors in a Hilbert space spanned by spin–space‐time kets large enough to contain the operators of the Poincaré group. These event operators transform properly under the action of Poincaré operators but do not commute with the mass. If the Compton wavelength is not negligible compared to the accuracy desired in the coordinate measurements, individual coordinate measurements are no longer possible. Nevertheless, a large number of repeated coordinate measurements can be carried out to produce a coordinate probability distribution. This distribution can be unfolded to find a true coordinate probability distribution if the charge form factor is known from basic theory. An analysis of laboratory particle detection techniques shows that they actually determine space coordinates and energy rather than spatial coordinates at a given time. When this fact is included, the Klein–Nishina formula can be derived using the electromagnetic four‐vector potential as the photon probability amplitude wave. To clarify the meaning of the observables, a mass‐momentum measurement is described.