Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Вестник Южно-Уральского государственного университета. Серия: Социально-гуманитарные науки

О соотношении генезиса общения и концепции дополнительности

Вячеслав Георгиевич Мушич-громыко

Published Jan 1, 2009• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

The paper is devoted to explanation the possible transcriptions of notion Principle of Complementarity in its applying to the other material than in quantum events. Moreover, the author makes a contrast between such notions as principle of and simply complementarity with further emphasizing on the notion integrity.

Related papers

О связи принципа дополнительности Н. Бора с иными системами знаний

Вячеслав Георгиевич Мушич-громыко

In some cases with quantum experiments, some features of the objects disappear. These features we define as a pair of conjugate and complementarity quantities. Such results are not a rarity in quantum studies and this fact makes it possible to use the princi ple of complementarity in various fields of other natural sciences and some applied areas of knowledge (concerning classical objects of knowledge). The author solves this problem by discovering a certain methodology that would be similar to the principle of complementarity but applicable to the objects in cultural and humanitarian sphere as well.

Вестник Вятского государственного гуманитарного университета•Jan 1, 2008•0 citations

Принцип дополнительности Н. Бора и проблема его статуса

Макаров Андрей Борисович

The article is devoted to the problem of scientific and philosophical status of complementarity principlef. The author analyzes its explication by N. Bohr and its comprehension by scientists and epistemologists. It is shown that generally, the complementarity principle is a set of ideas, which allows comprehending of specific situation in quantum mechanics. Some of ideas – the role of language of classical physics, the role of macro-instrument, the integrity of scientific experiment, the integrity of micro-object – could be seen as general scientific and epistemological principles. The prohibition of ontologisation of quantum phenomenon, which necessarily leads to contradictions is considered as the semantic core of Bohr’s approach. However, the attempts of its generalization in science and philosophy were not successful. The complementarity postulate is viewed as methodological principle of foundations of quantum mechanics in its Copenhagen interpretation.

•Jan 1, 2012•0 citations

On the Notions of Causality and Complementarity

Niels Henrik David Bohr

A short exposition is given of the foundation of the causal description in classical physics and the failure of the principle of causality in coping with atomic phenomena. It is emphasized that the individuality of the quantum processes excludes a separation between a behaviour of the atomic objects and their interaction with the measuring instruments denning the conditions under which the phenomena appear. This circumstance forces us to recognize a novel relationship, conveniently termed complementarity, between empirical evidence obtained under different experimental conditions. An appropriate tool for a complementary mode of description is provided by the quantum-mechanical formalism which allows us to account for regularities of definite or statistical character beyond the grasp of classical physical explanation. – N. B.

dialectica•Jan 1, 1948•340 citations

Социальный субъект в свете принципа дополнительности

Андрей Иванович Виноградов

The article describes methodological procedures that help apply the principle of complementarity to socio-humanitarian cognition. The objects studied by social sciences prove to bear fundamental similarities with the objects studied by quantum physics. Taking a subject of history as an example, the author reveals the wave-particle essence of the social subject.

Вестник Северного (Арктического) федерального университета. Серия: Гуманитарные и социальные науки•Jan 1, 2013•0 citations

К вопросу о продлении методологической силы принципа дополнительности Н. Бора на иные сферы познания

Вячеслав Георгиевич Мушич-громыко

The paper aim is to consider cognition in mathematics from the point of view of principle of complementarity when the latter stretches to elimination of the contradictions and disproves in historical development of such a scientific notion as «polyhedron».

Вестник Чувашского университета•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations

Objectivity on Quantum Events： The Principle of Complementarity and the Rortian Perspective

Nalliely, Hernández, Comejo

哲学研究：英文版•Jan 1, 2016•0 citations
In some cases with quantum experiments, some features of the objects disappear. These features we define as a pair of conjugate and complementarity quantities. Such results are not a rarity in quantum studies and this fact makes it possible to use the princi ple of complementarity in various fields of other natural sciences and some applied areas of knowledge (concerning classical objects of knowledge). The author solves this problem by discovering a certain methodology that would be similar to the principle of complementarity but applicable to the objects in cultural and humanitarian sphere as well.
The article is devoted to the problem of scientific and philosophical status of complementarity principlef. The author analyzes its explication by N. Bohr and its comprehension by scientists and epistemologists. It is shown that generally, the complementarity principle is a set of ideas, which allows comprehending of specific situation in quantum mechanics. Some of ideas – the role of language of classical physics, the role of macro-instrument, the integrity of scientific experiment, the integrity of micro-object – could be seen as general scientific and epistemological principles. The prohibition of ontologisation of quantum phenomenon, which necessarily leads to contradictions is considered as the semantic core of Bohr’s approach. However, the attempts of its generalization in science and philosophy were not successful. The complementarity postulate is viewed as methodological principle of foundations of quantum mechanics in its Copenhagen interpretation.
A short exposition is given of the foundation of the causal description in classical physics and the failure of the principle of causality in coping with atomic phenomena. It is emphasized that the individuality of the quantum processes excludes a separation between a behaviour of the atomic objects and their interaction with the measuring instruments denning the conditions under which the phenomena appear. This circumstance forces us to recognize a novel relationship, conveniently termed complementarity, between empirical evidence obtained under different experimental conditions. An appropriate tool for a complementary mode of description is provided by the quantum-mechanical formalism which allows us to account for regularities of definite or statistical character beyond the grasp of classical physical explanation. – N. B.