Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General

Mathematical considerations regarding the toroidal momentum operator

Dragoş-Victor Anghel

Published May 21, 1997• 8 citations
Publisher

Abstract

After a short presentation of the toroidal moments and the necessity to introduce them in the multipole expansion of current density, the correspondent quantum operators are introduced. The toroidal momentum operator (the quantum operator corresponding to the lowest-order toroidal multipole) is analysed. A natural set of coordinates is found. Using this set of coordinates it becomes possible to find the eigenvalues and a complete orthonormal set of eigenfunctions of the projection of this operator on the Oz axis.

DOI
10.1088/0305-4470/30/10/026

Related papers

Observables compatible to the toroidal moment operator

Dragoş-Victor Anghel, Amanda Teodora Preda

The quantum operator $\hat{T}_3$, corresponding to the projection of the toroidal moment on the $z$ axis, admits several self-adjoint extensions, when defined on the whole $\mathbb{R}^3$ space. $\hat{T}_3$ commutes with $\hat{L}_3$ (the projection of the angular momentum operator on the $z$ axis) and they have a \textit{natural set of coordinates} $(k,u,ϕ)$ where $ϕ$ is the azimuthal angle. The second set of \textit{natural coordinates} is $(k_1,k_2,u)$, where $k_1 = k\cosϕ$, $k_2 = k\sinϕ$. In both sets, $\hat{T}_3 = -i\hbar\partial/\partial u$, so any operator that is a function of $k$ and the partial derivatives with respect to the \textit{natural variables} $(k, u, ϕ)$ commute with $\hat{T}_3$ and $\hat{L}_3$. Similarly, operators that are functions of $k_1$, $k_2$, and the partial derivatives with respect to $k_1$, $k_2$, and $u$ commute with $\hat{T}_3$. Therefore, we introduce here the operators $\hat{p}_{k} \equiv -i \hbar \partial/\partial k$, $\hat{p}^{(k1)} \equiv -i \hbar \partial/\partial k_1$, and $\hat{p}^{(k2)} \equiv -i \hbar \partial/\partial k_2$ and express them in the $(x,y,z)$ coordinates. One may also invert the relations and write the typical operators, like the momentum $\hat{\bf p} \equiv -i\hbar {\bf \nabla}$ or the kinetic energy $\hat{H}_0 \equiv -\hbar^2Δ/(2m)$ in terms of the "toroidal" operators $\hat{T}_3$, $\hat{p}^{(k)}$, $\hat{p}^{(k1)}$, $\hat{p}^{(k2)}$, and, eventually, $\hat{L}_3$. The formalism may be applied to specific physical systems, like nuclei, condensed matter systems, or metamaterials. We exemplify it by calculating the momentum operator and the free particle Hamiltonian in terms of \textit{natural coordinates} in a thin torus, where the general relations get considerably simplified.

arXiv:2101.05889•Jan 14, 2021•0 citations

Current density and electric and magnetic multipole-moment operators in quantum mechanics

T. F. Meister, B. U. Felderhof

The authors define the quantum-mechanical current density operator for general Hamiltonian operators and hence define electric and magnetic multipole-moment operators in close correspondence with the classical case. General Hamiltonian operators are transformed to multipole form by canonical transformation. As examples we treat the charge exchange interaction and relativistic corrections to the magnetic moment of an electron moving in a central potential.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Jan 1, 1980•3 citations

On the Nonorthogonality of Generalized Momentum Eigenfunctions in Quantum Mechanics

Peter D. Robinson

The orthogonality requirement usually specified for the eigenfunctions φ of a quantum-mechanical operator P which has a continuous spectrum of eigenvalues λ, is ∫φ*(λ)φ(λ′) dλ=δ(λ−λ′). The derivation of this result is examined; it is seen to be merely a sufficient, but not a necessary condition for the consistent expansion of a bound-state wavefunction ψ in the form ∫ a(λ)φ(λ) dλ. The situation when P is a generalized momentum operator is investigated in detail. Such operators were discussed in the preceding paper. It is shown that any two of the corresponding momentum eigenfunctions are not usually orthogonal. Nevertheless, with the help of Fourier analysis, a consistent expansion ψ=∫ a(λ)φ(λ) dλ is established. The theory is illustrated with the familiar examples of a ``particle in a box'' and a ground-state hydrogen atom. When a space coordinate has a finite range, a quantum condition can be imposed on the generalized momentum eigenvalues so that the momentum eigenfunctions form a complete discrete orthogonal set. We attempt to justify the belief that such quantization is not essential unless it is necessary to ensure single-valued eigenfunctions.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Mar 1, 1963•3 citations

Some intricacies of the momentum operator in quantum mechanics

Utpal Roy, Suranjana Ghosh, Bhattacharya, Kaushik

In quantum mechanics textbooks the momentum operator is defined in the Cartesian coordinates and rarely the form of the momentum operator in spherical polar coordinates is discussed. Consequently one always generalizes the Cartesian prescription to other coordinates and falls in a trap. In this work we introduce the difficulties one faces when the question of the momentum operator in general curvilinear coordinates arises. We have tried to elucidate the points related to the definition of the momentum operator taking spherical polar coordinates as our specimen coordinate system and proposed an elementary method in which we can ascertain the form of the momentum operator in general coordinate systems.

arXiv:0706.0924•Jun 6, 2007•4 citations

The eigenvalue and eigenfunction of a coupled quantum oscillator

Xu Xiu-Wei, Guo Chun, Chi Yong-jiang +2 more

The energy eigenvalue,eigenfunction,matrix elements of coordinate and momentum operators in energy representation,and evolution operator for a two-dimentional coupled oscillator are presented by using the general linear quantum transformation theory.

College Physics•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations

Toroidal Transitions in Hydrogenic and Alkali Atoms

Kai Xiang Lee, Vincent Mancois, Kelvin Lim +1 more

In addition to electric and magnetic multipoles, the expansion of current density also yields toroidal terms, a lesser-known family of multipoles. A recent proposal, I. Kuprov $\textit{et al.}$, Science Adv. 8 abq6751 (2022), explores the possibility of a direct observation of optical toroidal transitions in hydrogen and alkali atoms in the presence of a large magnetic field that decouples the spin and the angular momentum of the electron. However, the difficulty of observing these transitions against the nearby electric dipole (E1) transitions were underestimated because of extra admixture coming from diamagnetic coupling. Here, we revisit the toroidal coupling in atoms, taking diamagnetic contribution into account, and discuss the technical challenges of observing toroidal coupling in atomic physics. We show that toroidal transition should be searched in transitions with low principal quantum numbers. The remaining strong electric-dipole contribution could be removed using an appropriate differential measurement.

physics.atom-phCross-listedarXiv:2607.19832•Jul 23, 2026•0 citations
After a short presentation of the toroidal moments and the necessity to introduce them in the multipole expansion of current density, the correspondent quantum operators are introduced. The toroidal momentum operator (the quantum operator corresponding to the lowest-order toroidal multipole) is analysed. A natural set of coordinates is found. Using this set of coordinates it becomes possible to find the eigenvalues and a complete orthonormal set of eigenfunctions of the projection of this operator on the Oz axis.
The quantum operator T^3\hat{T}_3T^3​, corresponding to the projection of the toroidal moment on the zzz axis, admits several self-adjoint extensions, when defined on the whole R3\mathbb{R}^3R3 space. T^3\hat{T}_3T^3​ commutes with L^3\hat{L}_3L^3​ (the projection of the angular momentum operator on the zzz axis) and they have a \textit{natural set of coordinates} (k,u,ϕ)(k,u,ϕ)(k,u,ϕ) where ϕϕϕ is the azimuthal angle. The second set of \textit{natural coordinates} is (k1,k2,u)(k_1,k_2,u)(k1​,k2​,u), where k1=kcos⁡ϕk_1 = k\cosϕk1​=kcosϕ, k2=ksin⁡ϕk_2 = k\sinϕk2​=ksinϕ. In both sets, T^3=−iℏ∂/∂u\hat{T}_3 = -i\hbar\partial/\partial uT^3​=−iℏ∂/∂u, so any operator that is a function of kkk and the partial derivatives with respect to the \textit{natural variables} (k,u,ϕ)(k, u, ϕ)(k,u,ϕ) commute with T^3\hat{T}_3T^3​ and L^3\hat{L}_3L^3​. Similarly, operators that are functions of k1k_1k1​, k2k_2k2​, and the partial derivatives with respect to k1k_1k1​, k2k_2k2​, and uuu commute with T^3\hat{T}_3T^3​. Therefore, we introduce here the operators p^k≡−iℏ∂/∂k\hat{p}_{k} \equiv -i \hbar \partial/\partial kp^​k​≡−iℏ∂/∂k, p^(k1)≡−iℏ∂/∂k1\hat{p}^{(k1)} \equiv -i \hbar \partial/\partial k_1p^​(k1)≡−iℏ∂/∂k1​, and p^(k2)≡−iℏ∂/∂k2\hat{p}^{(k2)} \equiv -i \hbar \partial/\partial k_2p^​(k2)≡−iℏ∂/∂k2​ and express them in the (x,y,z)(x,y,z)(x,y,z) coordinates. One may also invert the relations and write the typical operators, like the momentum p^≡−iℏ∇\hat{\bf p} \equiv -i\hbar {\bf \nabla}p^​≡−iℏ∇ or the kinetic energy H^0≡−ℏ2Δ/(2m)\hat{H}_0 \equiv -\hbar^2Δ/(2m)H^0​≡−ℏ2Δ/(2m) in terms of the "toroidal" operators T^3\hat{T}_3T^3​, p^(k)\hat{p}^{(k)}p^​(k), p^(k1)\hat{p}^{(k1)}p^​(k1), p^(k2)\hat{p}^{(k2)}p^​(k2), and, eventually, L^3\hat{L}_3L^3​. The formalism may be applied to specific physical systems, like nuclei, condensed matter systems, or metamaterials. We exemplify it by calculating the momentum operator and the free particle Hamiltonian in terms of \textit{natural coordinates} in a thin torus, where the general relations get considerably simplified.
The orthogonality requirement usually specified for the eigenfunctions φ of a quantum-mechanical operator P which has a continuous spectrum of eigenvalues λ, is ∫φ*(λ)φ(λ′) dλ=δ(λ−λ′). The derivation of this result is examined; it is seen to be merely a sufficient, but not a necessary condition for the consistent expansion of a bound-state wavefunction ψ in the form ∫ a(λ)φ(λ) dλ. The situation when P is a generalized momentum operator is investigated in detail. Such operators were discussed in the preceding paper. It is shown that any two of the corresponding momentum eigenfunctions are not usually orthogonal. Nevertheless, with the help of Fourier analysis, a consistent expansion ψ=∫ a(λ)φ(λ) dλ is established. The theory is illustrated with the familiar examples of a ``particle in a box'' and a ground-state hydrogen atom. When a space coordinate has a finite range, a quantum condition can be imposed on the generalized momentum eigenvalues so that the momentum eigenfunctions form a complete discrete orthogonal set. We attempt to justify the belief that such quantization is not essential unless it is necessary to ensure single-valued eigenfunctions.
In quantum mechanics textbooks the momentum operator is defined in the Cartesian coordinates and rarely the form of the momentum operator in spherical polar coordinates is discussed. Consequently one always generalizes the Cartesian prescription to other coordinates and falls in a trap. In this work we introduce the difficulties one faces when the question of the momentum operator in general curvilinear coordinates arises. We have tried to elucidate the points related to the definition of the momentum operator taking spherical polar coordinates as our specimen coordinate system and proposed an elementary method in which we can ascertain the form of the momentum operator in general coordinate systems.
In addition to electric and magnetic multipoles, the expansion of current density also yields toroidal terms, a lesser-known family of multipoles. A recent proposal, I. Kuprov et al.\textit{et al.}et al., Science Adv. 8 abq6751 (2022), explores the possibility of a direct observation of optical toroidal transitions in hydrogen and alkali atoms in the presence of a large magnetic field that decouples the spin and the angular momentum of the electron. However, the difficulty of observing these transitions against the nearby electric dipole (E1) transitions were underestimated because of extra admixture coming from diamagnetic coupling. Here, we revisit the toroidal coupling in atoms, taking diamagnetic contribution into account, and discuss the technical challenges of observing toroidal coupling in atomic physics. We show that toroidal transition should be searched in transitions with low principal quantum numbers. The remaining strong electric-dipole contribution could be removed using an appropriate differential measurement.