Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

European Journal of Physics

On the Wigner transforms of some simple systems and their semiclassical interpretation

M. Casas, H. Krivine, Joan Martorell

Published May 1, 1991• 9 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In quantum mechanics it is not possible to define a probability density for finding a particle at position r with momentum p. Nevertheless there is a function introduced by Wigner, which retains several significant features of the classical probability distribution. Using simple one-dimensional models the authors try to understand the very intricate structure of this function.

DOI
10.1088/0143-0807/12/3/001

Related papers

On the Quantum-Classical Character of the Quantum Wavefunction of Material Particles

Daniela Dragoman

We show that the quantum wavefunction, interpreted as the probability density of finding a single non-localized quantum particle, which evolves according to classical laws of motion, is an intermediate description of a material quantum particle between the quantum and classical realms. Accordingly, classical and quantum mechanics should not be treated separately, a unified description in terms of the Wigner distribution function being possible. Although defined on classical phase space coordinates, the Wigner distribution function accommodates the nonlocalization property of quantum systems, and leads to both the Schrodinger equation for the quantum wavefunction and to the definition of position and momentum operators.

arXiv:quant-ph/0604087•Annales de la fondation Louis de Broglie/Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie•Apr 12, 2006•0 citations

The Wigner function. I. The physical interpretation

Stig Stenholm

It is being argued that even in non-relativistic quantum mechanics the coordinate and momentum variables cannot be interpreted directly as observables. Only by defining these by suitable test bodies can one obtain verifiable predictions. When these arguments are implemented on a Wigner distribution the author shows that positive phase space probabilities always ensue, and hence this function can be used as a quantum mechanical phase space function.

European Journal of Physics•Oct 1, 1980•26 citations

Probability Concepts in Quantum Mechanics

Patrick Suppes

The fundamental problem considered is that of the existence of a joint probability distribution for momentum and position at a given instant. The philosophical interest of this problem is that for the potential energy functions (or Hamiltonians) corresponding to many simple experimental situations, the joint “distribution” derived by the methods of Wigner and Moyal is not a genuine probability distribution at all. The implications of these results for the interpretation of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle are analyzed. The final section consists of some observations concerning the axiomatic foundations of quantum mechanics.

Philosophy of Science•Oct 1, 1961•81 citations

A number–phase Wigner function

H. M. Moya-Cessa

One of the most prominent quasiprobability functions in quantum mechanics is the Wigner function, which gives the correct marginal probability functions if integrated over position or momentum. Here we depart from the definition of the position–momentum Wigner function to, by analogy, construct a number–phase Wigner function that, if summed over photon numbers, gives the correct phase distribution and, if integrated over phase, gives the correct photon distribution.

arXiv:quant-ph/0208095•Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics•Jun 1, 2003•16 citations

Quantum Ensembles

Robert H. Swendsen

The study of quantum statistical mechanics begins with a review of the basic principles of quantum mechanics. Schrödinger’s equation is introduced and Eigenstates (or stationary states) are defined. Model probability for quantum statistics is assumed to have a uniform distribution in phases. Wave functions for many-body systems are defined. The density matrix is introduced. The Planck entropy and the microcanonical ensemble are defined. The differences between classical and quantum statistical mechanics are all based on the differing concepts of a microscopic ‘state’. While the classical microscopic state (specified by a point in phase space) determines the exact position and momentum of every particle, the quantum mechanical state determines neither; quantum states can only provide probability distributions for observable quantities.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Dec 10, 2019•0 citations

Weyl Transformation and the Classical Limit of Quantum Mechanics

Boris Leaf

The Weyl correspondence for obtaining quantum operators from functions of classical coordinates and momenta is known to be incorrect. To calculate quantum-mechanical expectation values as phase-space averages with the Wigner density function, one cannot use classical functions but must use Weyl transforms. These transforms are defined and their properties derived from quantum mechanics. Their properties are expressed in terms of a Hermitian operator Δ(Q, K) whose Weyl transform is a δ function. The Wigner function is the transform of the density operator. Every Weyl transform is exhibited as a difference of two functions which are nonnegative on the phase spece. Weyl transforms do not obey the algebra of classical functions. In the classical limit ℏ → 0, Weyl transforms become classical functions, the Wigner function becomes nonnegative throughout the phase space, and the Hilbert space is spanned by an orthonormal set of vectors which are simultaneous eigenkets of the commuting coordinate and momentum operators.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jan 1, 1968•98 citations
In quantum mechanics it is not possible to define a probability density for finding a particle at position r with momentum p. Nevertheless there is a function introduced by Wigner, which retains several significant features of the classical probability distribution. Using simple one-dimensional models the authors try to understand the very intricate structure of this function.
We show that the quantum wavefunction, interpreted as the probability density of finding a single non-localized quantum particle, which evolves according to classical laws of motion, is an intermediate description of a material quantum particle between the quantum and classical realms. Accordingly, classical and quantum mechanics should not be treated separately, a unified description in terms of the Wigner distribution function being possible. Although defined on classical phase space coordinates, the Wigner distribution function accommodates the nonlocalization property of quantum systems, and leads to both the Schrodinger equation for the quantum wavefunction and to the definition of position and momentum operators.
The fundamental problem considered is that of the existence of a joint probability distribution for momentum and position at a given instant. The philosophical interest of this problem is that for the potential energy functions (or Hamiltonians) corresponding to many simple experimental situations, the joint “distribution” derived by the methods of Wigner and Moyal is not a genuine probability distribution at all. The implications of these results for the interpretation of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle are analyzed. The final section consists of some observations concerning the axiomatic foundations of quantum mechanics.
The study of quantum statistical mechanics begins with a review of the basic principles of quantum mechanics. Schrödinger’s equation is introduced and Eigenstates (or stationary states) are defined. Model probability for quantum statistics is assumed to have a uniform distribution in phases. Wave functions for many-body systems are defined. The density matrix is introduced. The Planck entropy and the microcanonical ensemble are defined. The differences between classical and quantum statistical mechanics are all based on the differing concepts of a microscopic ‘state’. While the classical microscopic state (specified by a point in phase space) determines the exact position and momentum of every particle, the quantum mechanical state determines neither; quantum states can only provide probability distributions for observable quantities.
The Weyl correspondence for obtaining quantum operators from functions of classical coordinates and momenta is known to be incorrect. To calculate quantum-mechanical expectation values as phase-space averages with the Wigner density function, one cannot use classical functions but must use Weyl transforms. These transforms are defined and their properties derived from quantum mechanics. Their properties are expressed in terms of a Hermitian operator Δ(Q, K) whose Weyl transform is a δ function. The Wigner function is the transform of the density operator. Every Weyl transform is exhibited as a difference of two functions which are nonnegative on the phase spece. Weyl transforms do not obey the algebra of classical functions. In the classical limit ℏ → 0, Weyl transforms become classical functions, the Wigner function becomes nonnegative throughout the phase space, and the Hilbert space is spanned by an orthonormal set of vectors which are simultaneous eigenkets of the commuting coordinate and momentum operators.