Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Technical Physics Letters

Quantization of natural systems

A. G. Chirkov, Igor V. Kazinets

Published Apr 1, 2000• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

New rules for the quantization of classical systems are proposed which generalize the traditional rules and reduce to these rules, provided that transition to the Cartesian coordinates is possible. An equation is suggested that offers generalization of the Schrödinger equation to arbitrary natural systems. Using the minimum coupling (strong equivalence) principle, this equation can be extended to arbitrary spaces with curvature.

DOI
10.1134/1.1262829

Related papers

Hydrogen atom in quantum mechanics and quantization on curved surfaces

A. G. Chirkov, Alexander Berdnikov

New quantization rules for classical systems are obtained using the Titchmarsh expansion. These rules generalize the conventional ones and are reduced to them when a transition to Cartesian coordinates exists. An equation generalizing the Schrödinger equation to arbitrary natural systems is found. The principle of minimal constraint (strong equivalence principle) makes it possible to extend this equation to any curved spaces.

Technical Physics•Apr 1, 2001•1 citation

Quantization of mechanical systems

Jesús Muñoz-Díaz, Ricardo J. Alonso-Blanco

In this paper we show what seems to be the (very simple) key for quantization of classical systems. Given a manifold M , each pair given by a riemannian metric (nondegenerate, of arbitrary signature) and a linear connection, canonically determine a quantization rule or 'Correspondence Principle', which assigns to each classical magnitude (function in TM , subject to certain conditions) a differential operator in . The issue about the order in which the p ' and q ' are to be taken in quantization loses all meaning, when the general rule has been fixed. Once specified the Correspondence Principle, each 'classical state' of the system, understood as a vector field on M , determines a wave equation for each magnitude. The Schrödinger equation is a particular example of these wave equations.

Journal of Physics Communications•Jan 17, 2018•5 citations

Quantization of three-dimensional space

Boris Leaf

Geometrical properties of space are described by relations between quantum observables, functions of generalized coordinate and momentum operators of a physical system. Space comprises the set of eigenvalues of the coordinate observables, which may be a discrete set of points instead of the continuum of classical geometry. Differentiation on coordinates and momenta is defined by commutation operations. Well-known formulas from classical geometry for gradient and divergence operators, connections, covariant differentiation, tangent vectors, geodesics, and the Riemann curvature tensor are derived as relations between quantum operators. The quantum formulation retains the symmetry between coordinate and momentum representations required by the principle of complementarity.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Mar 1, 1984•1 citation

From classical to quantum mechanics: “How to translate physical ideas into mathematical language”

Hervé Bergeron

Following previous works by E. Prugovečki [Physica A 91A, 202 (1978) and Stochastic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Space–time (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986)] on common features of classical and quantum mechanics, we develop a unified mathematical framework for classical and quantum mechanics (based on L2-spaces over classical phase space), in order to investigate to what extent quantum mechanics can be obtained as a simple modification of classical mechanics (on both logical and analytical levels). To obtain this unified framework, we split quantum theory in two parts: (i) general quantum axiomatics (a system is described by a state in a Hilbert space, observables are self-adjoints operators, and so on) and (ii) quantum mechanics proper that specifies the Hilbert space as L2(Rn); the Heisenberg rule [pi,qj]=−iℏδij with p=−iℏ∇, the free Hamiltonian H=−ℏ2Δ/2m and so on. We show that general quantum axiomatics (up to a supplementary “axiom of classicity”) can be used as a nonstandard mathematical ground to formulate physical ideas and equations of ordinary classical statistical mechanics. So, the question of a “true quantization” with “ℏ” must be seen as an independent physical problem not directly related with quantum formalism. At this stage, we show that this nonstandard formulation of classical mechanics exhibits a new kind of operation that has no classical counterpart: this operation is related to the “quantization process,” and we show why quantization physically depends on group theory (the Galilei group). This analytical procedure of quantization replaces the “correspondence principle” (or canonical quantization) and allows us to map classical mechanics into quantum mechanics, giving all operators of quantum dynamics and the Schrödinger equation. The great advantage of this point of view is that quantization is based on concrete physical arguments and not derived from some “pure algebraic rule” (we exhibit also some limit of the correspondence principle). Moreover spins for particles are naturally generated, including an approximation of their interaction with magnetic fields. We also recover by this approach the semi-classical formalism developed by E. Prugovečki [Stochastic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Space–time (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986)].

arXiv:quant-ph/0102084•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Sep 1, 2001•12 citations

From Koopman–von Neumann theory to quantum theory

U. Klein

Koopman and von Neumann (KvN) extended the Liouville equation by introducing a phase space function $$S^{(K)}(q,p,t)$$ whose physical meaning is unknown. We show that a different S(q, p, t), with well-defined physical meaning, may be introduced without destroying the attractive “quantum-like” mathematical features of the KvN theory. This new S(q, p, t) is the classical action expressed in phase space coordinates. It defines a mapping between observables and operators which preserves the Lie bracket structure. The new evolution equation reduces to Schrödinger’s equation if functions on phase space are reduced to functions on configuration space. This new kind of “quantization” does not only establish a correspondence between observables and operators, but provides in addition a derivation of quantum operators and evolution equations from corresponding classical entities. It is performed by replacing $$\frac{\partial }{\partial p}$$ by 0 and p by $$\frac{\hbar }{\imath } \frac{\partial }{\partial q}$$ , thus providing an explanation for the common quantization rules.

arXiv:1705.07427•Quantum Studies Mathematics and Foundations•May 31, 2017•25 citations

A derivation of the principles of canonical quantization

Howard E. Covington

Schrodinger's equation for a single particle is proved from the assumption that dynamics can be formulated in a space whose curvature is the electromagnetic force.

•Dec 8, 2009•0 citations
New rules for the quantization of classical systems are proposed which generalize the traditional rules and reduce to these rules, provided that transition to the Cartesian coordinates is possible. An equation is suggested that offers generalization of the Schrödinger equation to arbitrary natural systems. Using the minimum coupling (strong equivalence) principle, this equation can be extended to arbitrary spaces with curvature.
In this paper we show what seems to be the (very simple) key for quantization of classical systems. Given a manifold M , each pair given by a riemannian metric (nondegenerate, of arbitrary signature) and a linear connection, canonically determine a quantization rule or 'Correspondence Principle', which assigns to each classical magnitude (function in TM , subject to certain conditions) a differential operator in . The issue about the order in which the p ' and q ' are to be taken in quantization loses all meaning, when the general rule has been fixed. Once specified the Correspondence Principle, each 'classical state' of the system, understood as a vector field on M , determines a wave equation for each magnitude. The Schrödinger equation is a particular example of these wave equations.
Geometrical properties of space are described by relations between quantum observables, functions of generalized coordinate and momentum operators of a physical system. Space comprises the set of eigenvalues of the coordinate observables, which may be a discrete set of points instead of the continuum of classical geometry. Differentiation on coordinates and momenta is defined by commutation operations. Well-known formulas from classical geometry for gradient and divergence operators, connections, covariant differentiation, tangent vectors, geodesics, and the Riemann curvature tensor are derived as relations between quantum operators. The quantum formulation retains the symmetry between coordinate and momentum representations required by the principle of complementarity.
Following previous works by E. Prugovečki [Physica A 91A, 202 (1978) and Stochastic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Space–time (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986)] on common features of classical and quantum mechanics, we develop a unified mathematical framework for classical and quantum mechanics (based on L2-spaces over classical phase space), in order to investigate to what extent quantum mechanics can be obtained as a simple modification of classical mechanics (on both logical and analytical levels). To obtain this unified framework, we split quantum theory in two parts: (i) general quantum axiomatics (a system is described by a state in a Hilbert space, observables are self-adjoints operators, and so on) and (ii) quantum mechanics proper that specifies the Hilbert space as L2(Rn); the Heisenberg rule [pi,qj]=−iℏδij with p=−iℏ∇, the free Hamiltonian H=−ℏ2Δ/2m and so on. We show that general quantum axiomatics (up to a supplementary “axiom of classicity”) can be used as a nonstandard mathematical ground to formulate physical ideas and equations of ordinary classical statistical mechanics. So, the question of a “true quantization” with “ℏ” must be seen as an independent physical problem not directly related with quantum formalism. At this stage, we show that this nonstandard formulation of classical mechanics exhibits a new kind of operation that has no classical counterpart: this operation is related to the “quantization process,” and we show why quantization physically depends on group theory (the Galilei group). This analytical procedure of quantization replaces the “correspondence principle” (or canonical quantization) and allows us to map classical mechanics into quantum mechanics, giving all operators of quantum dynamics and the Schrödinger equation. The great advantage of this point of view is that quantization is based on concrete physical arguments and not derived from some “pure algebraic rule” (we exhibit also some limit of the correspondence principle). Moreover spins for particles are naturally generated, including an approximation of their interaction with magnetic fields. We also recover by this approach the semi-classical formalism developed by E. Prugovečki [Stochastic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Space–time (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986)].
Koopman and von Neumann (KvN) extended the Liouville equation by introducing a phase space function S(K)(q,p,t)S^{(K)}(q,p,t)S(K)(q,p,t) whose physical meaning is unknown. We show that a different S(q, p, t), with well-defined physical meaning, may be introduced without destroying the attractive “quantum-like” mathematical features of the KvN theory. This new S(q, p, t) is the classical action expressed in phase space coordinates. It defines a mapping between observables and operators which preserves the Lie bracket structure. The new evolution equation reduces to Schrödinger’s equation if functions on phase space are reduced to functions on configuration space. This new kind of “quantization” does not only establish a correspondence between observables and operators, but provides in addition a derivation of quantum operators and evolution equations from corresponding classical entities. It is performed by replacing ∂∂p\frac{\partial }{\partial p}∂p∂​ by 0 and p by ℏı∂∂q\frac{\hbar }{\imath } \frac{\partial }{\partial q}ℏ​∂q∂​ , thus providing an explanation for the common quantization rules.