Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Czechoslovak Journal of Physics

On the interpretation of quantum mechanics

V. Fock

Published Nov 1, 1957• 33 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf01946586

Related papers

On the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

CRC Press eBooks•May 21, 2004•0 citations

Quantum mechanics interpretation the limits——And to defend orthodox interpretation

Chen Gu-qing

The various interpretation to Quantum mechanics exist limitations in varying degrees,to replace orthodox interpretation of the programme is bound to the embarrassing situation.This is so because it is the classic physics language can not be used as an accurate language interpretation of quantum mechanics.Despite orthodox interpretation has shortcomings also,compare other interpretation,orthodox interpretation of quantum mechanics still be an excellent one.

Academic exchange quarterly•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations

On the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Ryan Lee

•Jan 1, 2008•0 citations

The Brain Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Christopher Giguere

For a glorious century now there have been interpretations of quantum mechanics to explain how everyday reality emerges from quantum reality. What they didn’t have a hundred years ago, which we have today, is detailed information about how the brain works in constructing reality. This paper contends that this information must be taken into account when making quantum interpretations, and does just that by providing a new interpretation of quantum mechanics: The Brain Interpretation. Our everyday reality is the brain’s interpretation of quantum reality that appears in everyone’s consciousness.

•Jul 30, 2025•0 citations

On the interpretation of quantum mechanics

F. J. Duarte

Institute of Physics eBooks•Sep 1, 2022•0 citations

Mandelstam's interpretation of quantum mechanics in comparative perspective

Alexander A. Pechenkin

In his 1939 Lectures, the prominent Soviet physicist L. I. Mandelstam proposed an interpretation of quantum mechanics that was understood in different ways. To assess Mandelstam's interpretation, we classify contemporary interpretations of quantum mechanics and compare his interpretation with others developed in the 1930s (the Copenhagen interpretation and the statistical interpretations proposed by K. R. Popper, H. Margenau, and E. C. Kemble). We conclude that Mandelstam's interpretation belongs to the family of minimal statistical interpretations and has much in common with interpretations developed by American physicists. Mandelstam's characteristic message was his theory of indirect measurement, which influenced his discussion of the “reduction of the wave packet” and the Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen argument. This article also reconstructs what lay behind Mandelstam's interpretation of quantum mechanics. This was his operationalism, by virtue of which his interpretation resembled Kemble's, in which the statistical and Copenhagen views had been combined. Like Popper and Margenau, Mandelstam followed R. von Mises's empirical conception of probability. Mandelstam, like the other proponents of the statistical approach to quantum mechanics, was affected by the culture of macroscopic experimentation with its emphasis on statistical (collective) measurement.

International Studies in the Philosophy of Science•Oct 1, 2002•2 citations
For a glorious century now there have been interpretations of quantum mechanics to explain how everyday reality emerges from quantum reality. What they didn’t have a hundred years ago, which we have today, is detailed information about how the brain works in constructing reality. This paper contends that this information must be taken into account when making quantum interpretations, and does just that by providing a new interpretation of quantum mechanics: The Brain Interpretation. Our everyday reality is the brain’s interpretation of quantum reality that appears in everyone’s consciousness.
In his 1939 Lectures, the prominent Soviet physicist L. I. Mandelstam proposed an interpretation of quantum mechanics that was understood in different ways. To assess Mandelstam's interpretation, we classify contemporary interpretations of quantum mechanics and compare his interpretation with others developed in the 1930s (the Copenhagen interpretation and the statistical interpretations proposed by K. R. Popper, H. Margenau, and E. C. Kemble). We conclude that Mandelstam's interpretation belongs to the family of minimal statistical interpretations and has much in common with interpretations developed by American physicists. Mandelstam's characteristic message was his theory of indirect measurement, which influenced his discussion of the “reduction of the wave packet” and the Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen argument. This article also reconstructs what lay behind Mandelstam's interpretation of quantum mechanics. This was his operationalism, by virtue of which his interpretation resembled Kemble's, in which the statistical and Copenhagen views had been combined. Like Popper and Margenau, Mandelstam followed R. von Mises's empirical conception of probability. Mandelstam, like the other proponents of the statistical approach to quantum mechanics, was affected by the culture of macroscopic experimentation with its emphasis on statistical (collective) measurement.