Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Mathematical Physics

Response to “Comment on ‘Uncertainty principle for proper time and mass’ ” [J. Math. Phys. 42, 3975 (2001)]

Shoju Kudaka, Shuichi Matsumoto

Published Aug 1, 2001• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1063/1.1367330

Related papers

Comment on ``On Derivations of the Uncertainty Principle''

Robert Yaris

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Jan 1, 1966•1 citation

Comment on “Uncertainty principle for proper time and mass” [J. Math. Phys 40, 1237 (1999)]

R. A. Krikorian

Kudaka and Matsumoto derive the uncertainty relation c2ΔmΔτ≈h between the proper time τ and rest mass m of a material particle by adopting for the description of the particle the Lagrangian L=M(τ̇−c−1−gμνẋμẋν)+eAμ(x)ẋμ, defined on the enlarged space (xμ,τ,M), where M is an additional dynamical variable. A key step in the derivation of their uncertainty relation is the identification of the variable M with the rest mass m. Adopting the point of view of variational analysis, we show that such an identification goes against the relativistic requirement of the path dependence of proper time.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Aug 1, 2001•0 citations

Comment on “The Bohr-Sommerfeld Theory and the Uncertainty Principle”

Ralph Klingbeil

American Journal of Physics•Feb 1, 1973•1 citation

On the Uncertainty Principle for Proper Time and Mass

Budh Ram

In [J. Math. Phys. {\bf 40}, 1237 (1999)] Kudaka and Matsumoto derive the uncertainty relation $c^2 Δm Δτ\geq \hbar/2$ between the rest mass $m$ and the proper time $τ$, by considering the Lagrangian $M(\dot τ- c^{-1} \sqrt{-g_{μν} \dot x^μ\dot x^ν}) + e A_μ(x) \dot x^μ$. In this note we give an alternative derivation based on a special case of the time-like geodesic equation obtained using the general relativistic Lagrangian $g_{μν} \frac{dx^μ}{d τ}\frac{dx^ν}{d τ}$.

arXiv:math-ph/0212071•Dec 26, 2002•0 citations

Response to “Comment on ‘Entropy and complexity analysis of hydrogenic Rydberg atoms’” [J. Math. Phys. 58, 104101 (2017)]

Sheila López‐Rosa, I. V. Toranzo, Pablo Sánchez-Moreno +1 more

Entropic uncertainty measures for large dimensional hydrogenic systems

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Oct 1, 2017•2 citations

Comments on ‘‘When is a quantum measurement?’’ [Am. J. Phys. 5 4, 688 (1986)]

Peter John Bussey

American Journal of Physics•Jun 1, 1988•0 citations
Kudaka and Matsumoto derive the uncertainty relation c2ΔmΔτ≈h between the proper time τ and rest mass m of a material particle by adopting for the description of the particle the Lagrangian L=M(τ̇−c−1−gμνẋμẋν)+eAμ(x)ẋμ, defined on the enlarged space (xμ,τ,M), where M is an additional dynamical variable. A key step in the derivation of their uncertainty relation is the identification of the variable M with the rest mass m. Adopting the point of view of variational analysis, we show that such an identification goes against the relativistic requirement of the path dependence of proper time.
In [J. Math. Phys. {\bf 40}, 1237 (1999)] Kudaka and Matsumoto derive the uncertainty relation c2ΔmΔτ≥ℏ/2c^2 Δm Δτ\geq \hbar/2c2ΔmΔτ≥ℏ/2 between the rest mass mmm and the proper time τττ, by considering the Lagrangian M(τ˙−c−1−gμνx˙μx˙ν)+eAμ(x)x˙μM(\dot τ- c^{-1} \sqrt{-g_{μν} \dot x^μ\dot x^ν}) + e A_μ(x) \dot x^μM(τ˙−c−1−gμν​x˙μx˙ν​)+eAμ​(x)x˙μ. In this note we give an alternative derivation based on a special case of the time-like geodesic equation obtained using the general relativistic Lagrangian gμνdxμdτdxνdτg_{μν} \frac{dx^μ}{d τ}\frac{dx^ν}{d τ}gμν​dτdxμ​dτdxν​.