Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The Journal of Chemical Physics

Comment on ``On Derivations of the Uncertainty Principle''

Robert Yaris

Published Jan 1, 1966• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1063/1.1726494

Related papers

Comment on “The Bohr-Sommerfeld Theory and the Uncertainty Principle”

Ralph Klingbeil

American Journal of Physics•Feb 1, 1973•1 citation

Comments on "The Hawthorne Uncertainty Principle"

IEEE Transactions on Education•May 1, 1974•1 citation

Response to “Comment on ‘Uncertainty principle for proper time and mass’ ” [J. Math. Phys. 42, 3975 (2001)]

Shoju Kudaka, Shuichi Matsumoto

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Aug 1, 2001•0 citations

Comment on “Path-integral action of a particle with the generalized uncertainty principle and correspondence with noncommutativity”

DaeKil Park, Eylee Jung

Recently in Phys. Rev. D 99, 104010 (2019), the nonrelativistic Feynman propagator for a harmonic oscillator system was presented when the generalized uncertainty principle is employed. In this short Comment we show that the expression is incorrect, and we derive its correct form.

arXiv:2002.07954•Physical review. D/Physical review. D.•Mar 9, 2020•5 citations

On Derivations of the Uncertainty Principle

Ernest R. Davidson

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Feb 15, 1965•21 citations

Comment on “Uncertainty principle for proper time and mass” [J. Math. Phys 40, 1237 (1999)]

R. A. Krikorian

Kudaka and Matsumoto derive the uncertainty relation c2ΔmΔτ≈h between the proper time τ and rest mass m of a material particle by adopting for the description of the particle the Lagrangian L=M(τ̇−c−1−gμνẋμẋν)+eAμ(x)ẋμ, defined on the enlarged space (xμ,τ,M), where M is an additional dynamical variable. A key step in the derivation of their uncertainty relation is the identification of the variable M with the rest mass m. Adopting the point of view of variational analysis, we show that such an identification goes against the relativistic requirement of the path dependence of proper time.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Aug 1, 2001•0 citations
Kudaka and Matsumoto derive the uncertainty relation c2ΔmΔτ≈h between the proper time τ and rest mass m of a material particle by adopting for the description of the particle the Lagrangian L=M(τ̇−c−1−gμνẋμẋν)+eAμ(x)ẋμ, defined on the enlarged space (xμ,τ,M), where M is an additional dynamical variable. A key step in the derivation of their uncertainty relation is the identification of the variable M with the rest mass m. Adopting the point of view of variational analysis, we show that such an identification goes against the relativistic requirement of the path dependence of proper time.