Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Progress of Theoretical Physics

Generalized Coherent State Approach to Quantum Measurement

Shoju Kudaka, S. Matsumoto, K. Kakazu

Published Oct 1, 1989• 27 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We present and discuss some models for the quantum measuring process. Our models indicate that the coherent state approach to classical limits in quantum theories becomes a powerful method for a unified description of various measuring processes. Each detector in the models has a parameter N , the number of its dynamical variables; the whole process of an interaction between an object system and the detector is calculable for any finite number N . It is shown that the detector states after the interaction are characterized by a macroscopic parameter, which is closely connected with the “reliability” of the detector. The reliability plays an essential role in eliminating the quantum interference between two states corresponding to two different positions of the pointer. Finally, the quantum mechanics of the detector reduces to classical mechanics on suitable “phase space” as N becomes large, as is required.

DOI
10.1143/ptp.82.665

Related papers

One-Particle Detectors with SU(1, 1) Coherent States in Quantum Measurement

K. Kakazu, A. Ogawa

The generalized coherent states based on SU(1, 1) are applied to quantum-measuring processes, in which each detector consists of a single particle. Differing from the Glauber coherent states, possible interactions are quite restricted. New definitions of the classical limit and classical operators are presented, where any polynomial of the position and momentum operators becomes classical. Although quantum interference itself becomes very large as the time after the interaction is increased, the statistical operator approaches its mixed-state part in a relative sense.

Progress of Theoretical Physics•Oct 1, 1991•1 citation

One-Particle Detectors with SU(1, 1) Coherent States in Quantum Measurement

Kiyotaka Kakazu, Akihiko Ogawa

The generalized coherent states based on SU(1, 1) are applied to quantum-measuring processes, in which each detector consists of a single particle. Differing from the Glauber coherent states, possible interactions are quite restricted. New definitions of the classical limit and classical operators are presented, where any polynomial of the position and momentum operators becomes classical. Although quantum interference itself becomes very large as the time after the interaction is increased, the statistical operator approaches its mixed-state part in a relative sense.

Progress of Theoretical Physics•Oct 1, 1991•0 citations

Macroscopic variables of the macroscopic system and the theory of measurement. II. Models

R. Fukuda

Models are presented as examples in order to illustrate the previously proposed theory of measurement in quantum mechanics [R. Fukuda, Phys. Rev. A 35, 8 (1987)]. It is based on the specific structure of the Hilbert space of the macroscopic system. It is shown that after the interaction of an object with a detector we have to prepare the exponential of the extensive operators to recover the interference which is lost in the measuring process.

Physical Review A•Oct 1, 1987•8 citations

On the Quantum Mechanical Description of the Interaction between Particle and Detector

K. Wick

Quantum measurements of physical quantities are often described as ideal measurements. However, only a few measurements fulfil the conditions of ideal measurements. The aim of the present work is to describe real position measurements with detectors that are able to detect single particles. For this purpose, a detector model is developed that can describe the time dependence of the interaction between a non-relativistic particle and a detector. The example of a position measurement shows that this interaction can be described with the methods of quantum mechanics. At the beginning of a position measurement, the detector behaves as a target consisting of a large number of quantum mechanical systems. In the first reaction, the incident particle interacts with a single atom, electron or nucleus, but not with the whole detector. This reaction and all following reactions are quantum mechanical processes. At the end of the measurement, the detector can be considered as a classical apparatus. A detector is neither a quantum mechanical system nor a classical apparatus. The detector model explains why one obtains a well-defined result for each individual position measurement. It further explains that, in general, it is impossible to predict the outcome of an individual measurement.

arXiv:1901.05403•Physics•Nov 8, 2021•1 citation

Quantum measurement

Franck Laloë

The process of measurement plays an important role in quantum theory. Measurements can be direct, if the physical system S interacts directly with the measurement apparatus M (as we have assumed until now), or indirect. In the latter case, the physical system first interacts with an ancillary system B , which may have a space of states that is very different from that of S , for instance much larger; after this interaction has finished, M is used to perform a measurement on B , without any direct interaction with A . Because S is then “protected” from any direct interaction with the measurement apparatus, the state of S is not necessarily strongly modified, and may even be only weakly affected. In both cases, the process implies entanglement between several physical systems. In this chapter, we study how this entanglement is created and used for measurements as well as the notion of weak and continuous measurements. These questions play an important role in several of the interpretations of quantum mechanics that we discuss in Chapter 10. Direct measurements The Von Neumann model of quantum measurement [4] provides a general frame for describing the process in terms of correlations appearing (or disappearing) in the state vector associated with the whole system S + M . In this model, the two systems S and M are initially described by a product state ∣ψ 0 〈 and interact during the time of measurement, so that they become entangled; they then reach a final state ∣ψ′〈 and do not interact anymore.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Aug 30, 2012•0 citations

Loss of quantum-mechanical coherence in a measurement process

Hiromichi Nakazato, Saverio Pascazio

A quantum-mechanical measurement process is analyzed in terms of a model Hamiltonian describing the interaction between a quantum system (a ``particle'') and a macroscopic apparatus (a ``detector''), which is assumed to be made up of N two-level elementary constituents (``molecules''). The description of the molecule locations introduces an effective fluctuating coupling constant, and this provokes a loss of quantum-mechanical coherence in the limit of large N. It is argued that coherence is lost statistically, as a result of the interaction: The collapse of the wave function is indeed obtained when the same experiment is performed many times, as a result of the microscopic differences among macroscopically identical initial states of the detector. In this way, insight is obtained into the mechanism engendering the loss of coherence suffered by a quantum-mechanical system when interacting with a macroscopic apparatus, and the concept of ``wave-function collapse'' is replaced by that of a statistically defined dephasing process. No classical behavior of the detection system is postulated and the presence of no external observer is required.

Physical Review A•Apr 1, 1992•15 citations
We present and discuss some models for the quantum measuring process. Our models indicate that the coherent state approach to classical limits in quantum theories becomes a powerful method for a unified description of various measuring processes. Each detector in the models has a parameter N , the number of its dynamical variables; the whole process of an interaction between an object system and the detector is calculable for any finite number N . It is shown that the detector states after the interaction are characterized by a macroscopic parameter, which is closely connected with the “reliability” of the detector. The reliability plays an essential role in eliminating the quantum interference between two states corresponding to two different positions of the pointer. Finally, the quantum mechanics of the detector reduces to classical mechanics on suitable “phase space” as N becomes large, as is required.
The generalized coherent states based on SU(1, 1) are applied to quantum-measuring processes, in which each detector consists of a single particle. Differing from the Glauber coherent states, possible interactions are quite restricted. New definitions of the classical limit and classical operators are presented, where any polynomial of the position and momentum operators becomes classical. Although quantum interference itself becomes very large as the time after the interaction is increased, the statistical operator approaches its mixed-state part in a relative sense.
The generalized coherent states based on SU(1, 1) are applied to quantum-measuring processes, in which each detector consists of a single particle. Differing from the Glauber coherent states, possible interactions are quite restricted. New definitions of the classical limit and classical operators are presented, where any polynomial of the position and momentum operators becomes classical. Although quantum interference itself becomes very large as the time after the interaction is increased, the statistical operator approaches its mixed-state part in a relative sense.
Quantum measurements of physical quantities are often described as ideal measurements. However, only a few measurements fulfil the conditions of ideal measurements. The aim of the present work is to describe real position measurements with detectors that are able to detect single particles. For this purpose, a detector model is developed that can describe the time dependence of the interaction between a non-relativistic particle and a detector. The example of a position measurement shows that this interaction can be described with the methods of quantum mechanics. At the beginning of a position measurement, the detector behaves as a target consisting of a large number of quantum mechanical systems. In the first reaction, the incident particle interacts with a single atom, electron or nucleus, but not with the whole detector. This reaction and all following reactions are quantum mechanical processes. At the end of the measurement, the detector can be considered as a classical apparatus. A detector is neither a quantum mechanical system nor a classical apparatus. The detector model explains why one obtains a well-defined result for each individual position measurement. It further explains that, in general, it is impossible to predict the outcome of an individual measurement.
The process of measurement plays an important role in quantum theory. Measurements can be direct, if the physical system S interacts directly with the measurement apparatus M (as we have assumed until now), or indirect. In the latter case, the physical system first interacts with an ancillary system B , which may have a space of states that is very different from that of S , for instance much larger; after this interaction has finished, M is used to perform a measurement on B , without any direct interaction with A . Because S is then “protected” from any direct interaction with the measurement apparatus, the state of S is not necessarily strongly modified, and may even be only weakly affected. In both cases, the process implies entanglement between several physical systems. In this chapter, we study how this entanglement is created and used for measurements as well as the notion of weak and continuous measurements. These questions play an important role in several of the interpretations of quantum mechanics that we discuss in Chapter 10. Direct measurements The Von Neumann model of quantum measurement [4] provides a general frame for describing the process in terms of correlations appearing (or disappearing) in the state vector associated with the whole system S + M . In this model, the two systems S and M are initially described by a product state ∣ψ 0 〈 and interact during the time of measurement, so that they become entangled; they then reach a final state ∣ψ′〈 and do not interact anymore.
A quantum-mechanical measurement process is analyzed in terms of a model Hamiltonian describing the interaction between a quantum system (a ``particle'') and a macroscopic apparatus (a ``detector''), which is assumed to be made up of N two-level elementary constituents (``molecules''). The description of the molecule locations introduces an effective fluctuating coupling constant, and this provokes a loss of quantum-mechanical coherence in the limit of large N. It is argued that coherence is lost statistically, as a result of the interaction: The collapse of the wave function is indeed obtained when the same experiment is performed many times, as a result of the microscopic differences among macroscopically identical initial states of the detector. In this way, insight is obtained into the mechanism engendering the loss of coherence suffered by a quantum-mechanical system when interacting with a macroscopic apparatus, and the concept of ``wave-function collapse'' is replaced by that of a statistically defined dephasing process. No classical behavior of the detection system is postulated and the presence of no external observer is required.