Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1901.05403 · Physics

On the Quantum Mechanical Description of the Interaction between Particle and Detector

K. Wick

Published Nov 8, 2021• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Quantum measurements of physical quantities are often described as ideal measurements. However, only a few measurements fulfil the conditions of ideal measurements. The aim of the present work is to describe real position measurements with detectors that are able to detect single particles. For this purpose, a detector model is developed that can describe the time dependence of the interaction between a non-relativistic particle and a detector. The example of a position measurement shows that this interaction can be described with the methods of quantum mechanics. At the beginning of a position measurement, the detector behaves as a target consisting of a large number of quantum mechanical systems. In the first reaction, the incident particle interacts with a single atom, electron or nucleus, but not with the whole detector. This reaction and all following reactions are quantum mechanical processes. At the end of the measurement, the detector can be considered as a classical apparatus. A detector is neither a quantum mechanical system nor a classical apparatus. The detector model explains why one obtains a well-defined result for each individual position measurement. It further explains that, in general, it is impossible to predict the outcome of an individual measurement.

DOI
10.3390/physics3040061

Related papers

Quantum Mechanics: reality or an illusion of the detector? Paper I: Interference with non-interacting photons and a special type of detector

Ioannis Contopoulos

We present a statistical model of non-interacting individual classical particles that may lead to a microscopic implementation of quantum mechanics. The model requires the action of a special type of detector that detects and records individual particles. According to our model, microscopic particles are classical entities that follow classical trajectories without nonlocal interactions between them. As long as they remain undetected, particles carry the information of a phase equal to an action integral along their trajectory. At the point of their detection, our special type of detector collects the phases from all particles reaching it, adds them up over time as complex numbers, and divides them by the square root of their number. The detector records a detection each time the square of the magnitude of the ensuing vector crosses an integer value. We test our model with numerical simulations of a double-slit experiment, and obtain an interference pattern analogous to the one observed in an actual physical experiment.

arXiv:2203.10942•Feb 25, 2022•0 citations

Measurements on relativistic quantum fields: II. Detector models

Charis Anastopoulos, Ntina Savvidou

This is the second paper on a new formalism for relativistic quantum measurements. Here, we construct a fully relativistic model for detectors that takes into account the detector's state of motion, intrinsics dynamics, initial states and couplings to the measured field. The dual classical/quantum description of the detector is implemented by using a master-equation type of approximation for the coarse-grained pointer variables. Then we identify the probabilities that correspond to ideal measurements, i.e., measurements that are largely insensitive to modeling details of the apparatus. The Unruh-Dewitt and Glauber detectors are recovered at the appropriate limits. We employ our results to models of particle detection, photodetection and relativistic spin measurements, and we derive an ideal distribution for relativistic time-of-arrival probabilities.

arXiv:1509.01838•Sep 6, 2015•2 citations

Measurement of a quantum particle position at two distant locations: a model

J. Dittrich

A simplified one-dimensional model of measurement of the position of a quantum particle by two distant detectors is considered. Detectors are modelled by quantum particles bounded in potential wells with just two bound states, prepared in the excited states. Their de-excitation due to the short range interaction with the measured particle is the signal for the detection. In the approximations of short time or small coupling between the particle and the measuring apparatuses, the simultaneous detection of the particle by both detectors is suppressed. The results extend to other models with two-level detectors.

Acta Polytechnica•Aug 31, 2022•0 citations

Quantum Real numbers and Measurement

J. V. Corbett

The quantum mechanical measurement problem does not arise in the quantum real number approach to quantum measurements of the first kind. The attributes of individual microscopic systems in the experimental ensemble always have qr-number values so the individual systems can be followed throughout the process. The interaction with an apparatus connects the qr-number value of the quantity to be measured with the qr-number value of an attribute of the apparatus that can be locally approximated by a classical number and subsequently amplified to a recordable output.

arXiv:1902.02183•Feb 3, 2019•0 citations

The Precision Limits in a Single-Event Quantum Measurement of Electron Momentum and Position

H. Schmidt‐Böcking, S. Eckart, Hans Jürgen Lüdde +2 more

Abstract A modern state-of-the-art “quantum measurement” [The term “quantum measurement” as used here implies that parameters of atomic particles are measured that emerge from a single scattering process of quantum particles.] of momentum and position of a single electron at a given time [“at a given time” means directly after the scattering process. (It should be noticed that the duration of the reaction process is typically extremely short => attoseconds).] and the precision limits for their experimental determination are discussed from an experimentalists point of view. We show—by giving examples of actually performed experiments—that in a single reaction between quantum particles at a given time only the momenta of the emitted particles but not their positions can be measured with sub-atomic resolution. This fundamental disparity between the conjugate variables of momentum and position is due to the fact that during a single-event measurement only the total momentum but not position is conserved as function of time. We highlight, that (other than prevalently perceived) Heisenberg’s “Uncertainty Relation” UR [1] does not limit the achievable resolution of momentum in a single-event measurement. Thus, Heisenberg’s statement that in a single-event measurement only either the position or the momentum (velocity) of a quantum particle can be measured with high precision contradicts a real experiment. The UR states only a correlation between the mean statistical fluctuations of a large number of repeated single-event measurements of two conjugate variables. A detailed discussion of the real measurement process and its precision with respect to momentum and position is presented.

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2021•2 citations

A stochastic model for quantum measurement

Agung Budiyono

We develop a statistical model of microscopic stochastic deviation from classical mechanics based on a stochastic process with a transition probability that is assumed to be given by an exponential distribution of infinitesimal stationary action. We apply the statistical model to stochastically modify a classical mechanical model for the measurement of physical quantities reproducing the prediction of quantum mechanics. The system+apparatus always has a definite configuration at all times, as in classical mechanics, fluctuating randomly following a continuous trajectory. On the other hand, the wavefunction and quantum mechanical Hermitian operator corresponding to the physical quantity arise formally as artificial mathematical constructs. During a single measurement, the wavefunction of the whole system+apparatus evolves according to a Schrödinger equation and the configuration of the apparatus acts as the pointer of the measurement so that there is no wavefunction collapse. We will also show that while the outcome of each single measurement event does not reveal the actual value of the physical quantity prior to measurement, its average in an ensemble of identical measurements is equal to the average of the actual value of the physical quantity prior to measurement over the distribution of the configuration of the system.

arXiv:1310.6028•Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment•Nov 15, 2013•2 citations
Quantum measurements of physical quantities are often described as ideal measurements. However, only a few measurements fulfil the conditions of ideal measurements. The aim of the present work is to describe real position measurements with detectors that are able to detect single particles. For this purpose, a detector model is developed that can describe the time dependence of the interaction between a non-relativistic particle and a detector. The example of a position measurement shows that this interaction can be described with the methods of quantum mechanics. At the beginning of a position measurement, the detector behaves as a target consisting of a large number of quantum mechanical systems. In the first reaction, the incident particle interacts with a single atom, electron or nucleus, but not with the whole detector. This reaction and all following reactions are quantum mechanical processes. At the end of the measurement, the detector can be considered as a classical apparatus. A detector is neither a quantum mechanical system nor a classical apparatus. The detector model explains why one obtains a well-defined result for each individual position measurement. It further explains that, in general, it is impossible to predict the outcome of an individual measurement.
We present a statistical model of non-interacting individual classical particles that may lead to a microscopic implementation of quantum mechanics. The model requires the action of a special type of detector that detects and records individual particles. According to our model, microscopic particles are classical entities that follow classical trajectories without nonlocal interactions between them. As long as they remain undetected, particles carry the information of a phase equal to an action integral along their trajectory. At the point of their detection, our special type of detector collects the phases from all particles reaching it, adds them up over time as complex numbers, and divides them by the square root of their number. The detector records a detection each time the square of the magnitude of the ensuing vector crosses an integer value. We test our model with numerical simulations of a double-slit experiment, and obtain an interference pattern analogous to the one observed in an actual physical experiment.
This is the second paper on a new formalism for relativistic quantum measurements. Here, we construct a fully relativistic model for detectors that takes into account the detector's state of motion, intrinsics dynamics, initial states and couplings to the measured field. The dual classical/quantum description of the detector is implemented by using a master-equation type of approximation for the coarse-grained pointer variables. Then we identify the probabilities that correspond to ideal measurements, i.e., measurements that are largely insensitive to modeling details of the apparatus. The Unruh-Dewitt and Glauber detectors are recovered at the appropriate limits. We employ our results to models of particle detection, photodetection and relativistic spin measurements, and we derive an ideal distribution for relativistic time-of-arrival probabilities.
A simplified one-dimensional model of measurement of the position of a quantum particle by two distant detectors is considered. Detectors are modelled by quantum particles bounded in potential wells with just two bound states, prepared in the excited states. Their de-excitation due to the short range interaction with the measured particle is the signal for the detection. In the approximations of short time or small coupling between the particle and the measuring apparatuses, the simultaneous detection of the particle by both detectors is suppressed. The results extend to other models with two-level detectors.
The quantum mechanical measurement problem does not arise in the quantum real number approach to quantum measurements of the first kind. The attributes of individual microscopic systems in the experimental ensemble always have qr-number values so the individual systems can be followed throughout the process. The interaction with an apparatus connects the qr-number value of the quantity to be measured with the qr-number value of an attribute of the apparatus that can be locally approximated by a classical number and subsequently amplified to a recordable output.
Abstract A modern state-of-the-art “quantum measurement” [The term “quantum measurement” as used here implies that parameters of atomic particles are measured that emerge from a single scattering process of quantum particles.] of momentum and position of a single electron at a given time [“at a given time” means directly after the scattering process. (It should be noticed that the duration of the reaction process is typically extremely short => attoseconds).] and the precision limits for their experimental determination are discussed from an experimentalists point of view. We show—by giving examples of actually performed experiments—that in a single reaction between quantum particles at a given time only the momenta of the emitted particles but not their positions can be measured with sub-atomic resolution. This fundamental disparity between the conjugate variables of momentum and position is due to the fact that during a single-event measurement only the total momentum but not position is conserved as function of time. We highlight, that (other than prevalently perceived) Heisenberg’s “Uncertainty Relation” UR [1] does not limit the achievable resolution of momentum in a single-event measurement. Thus, Heisenberg’s statement that in a single-event measurement only either the position or the momentum (velocity) of a quantum particle can be measured with high precision contradicts a real experiment. The UR states only a correlation between the mean statistical fluctuations of a large number of repeated single-event measurements of two conjugate variables. A detailed discussion of the real measurement process and its precision with respect to momentum and position is presented.
We develop a statistical model of microscopic stochastic deviation from classical mechanics based on a stochastic process with a transition probability that is assumed to be given by an exponential distribution of infinitesimal stationary action. We apply the statistical model to stochastically modify a classical mechanical model for the measurement of physical quantities reproducing the prediction of quantum mechanics. The system+apparatus always has a definite configuration at all times, as in classical mechanics, fluctuating randomly following a continuous trajectory. On the other hand, the wavefunction and quantum mechanical Hermitian operator corresponding to the physical quantity arise formally as artificial mathematical constructs. During a single measurement, the wavefunction of the whole system+apparatus evolves according to a Schrödinger equation and the configuration of the apparatus acts as the pointer of the measurement so that there is no wavefunction collapse. We will also show that while the outcome of each single measurement event does not reveal the actual value of the physical quantity prior to measurement, its average in an ensemble of identical measurements is equal to the average of the actual value of the physical quantity prior to measurement over the distribution of the configuration of the system.