Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Foundations of Physics Letters

Variable detection probability in two-photon interference

Ramón Risco, F. Selleri

Published Jun 1, 1993• 3 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf00665727

Related papers

Observation of two-photon interference with continuous variables by homodyne detection

Daohua Wu, Kota Kawamoto, Xiaomin Guo +3 more

The European Physical Journal D•Oct 1, 2017•4 citations

Observation of Photon Statistics in Two-Photon Interference for Continuous Variables

Daohua Wu, Kota Kawamoto, Katsuyuki Kasai +2 more

The Japan Society of Applied Physics•Feb 3, 2017•0 citations

One- and Two-Photon Interference

Paul G. Kwiat

Compendium of Quantum Physics•Jan 1, 2009•1 citation

Proposal for a new test of locality in a two-photon interference experiment

Z. Y. Ou, C. K. Hong, L. Mandeļ

A new experimental test of one form of Bell’s inequality is proposed that involves measurement of the joint probability for the detection of two photons as a function of position. The two photons are produced In the process of spontaneous parametric downconversion of pump photons in a nonlinear medium and are allowed to interfere. Although polarizers are used also, the essential variables are the photon positions, which are orthogonal, unlike most polarization states. The probabilities that enter into the Bell inequality, therefore, relate to mutually exclusive events, unlike those in previous tests of locality.

Annual Meeting Optical Society of America•Jan 1, 1987•0 citations

Two-photon quantum interference with independent sources

Rainer Kaltenbaek, B. Blauensteiner, Markus Aspelmeyer +2 more

•Jan 1, 2005•0 citations

Theory of two-photon Interference in downconversion

Rupamanjari Ghosh, C. K. Hong, Z. Y. Ou +1 more

A theoretical treatment is given of the situation in which two photons produced in the parametric frequency splitting of light in a nonlinear medium are allowed to interfere. It is shown that there is no interference pattern in the usual sense of quantities that are of the second order in the field, but that fourth-order interference effects are present. These could be demonstrated by placing two photodetectors at positions x,x′ in the interference plane and measuring the joint probability of two detections as a function of x – x′. The probability is predicted to exhibit a cosine modulation with separation x – x′ of close to 100% visibility, even when the integration time in the experiment greatly exceeds the reciprocal bandwidth of the accepted photons. As a result two photons cannot be detected at two points separated by a distance corresponding to an odd number of half-interference fringes. This is an interference effect that violates the laws of classical probability.

Annual Meeting Optical Society of America•Jan 1, 1986•0 citations
A new experimental test of one form of Bell’s inequality is proposed that involves measurement of the joint probability for the detection of two photons as a function of position. The two photons are produced In the process of spontaneous parametric downconversion of pump photons in a nonlinear medium and are allowed to interfere. Although polarizers are used also, the essential variables are the photon positions, which are orthogonal, unlike most polarization states. The probabilities that enter into the Bell inequality, therefore, relate to mutually exclusive events, unlike those in previous tests of locality.
A theoretical treatment is given of the situation in which two photons produced in the parametric frequency splitting of light in a nonlinear medium are allowed to interfere. It is shown that there is no interference pattern in the usual sense of quantities that are of the second order in the field, but that fourth-order interference effects are present. These could be demonstrated by placing two photodetectors at positions x,x′ in the interference plane and measuring the joint probability of two detections as a function of x – x′. The probability is predicted to exhibit a cosine modulation with separation x – x′ of close to 100% visibility, even when the integration time in the experiment greatly exceeds the reciprocal bandwidth of the accepted photons. As a result two photons cannot be detected at two points separated by a distance corresponding to an odd number of half-interference fringes. This is an interference effect that violates the laws of classical probability.