The hartree-fock problem with subsidiary conditions and the random phase approximation

Seiya Nishiyama, Kazuhiro Ishida, Moriyoshi Ido

Nazakat Ullah

Calvin W. Johnson, Ionel Stetcu

The Hartree-Fock approximation to the many-fermion problem can break exact symmetries, and in some cases by changing a parameter in the interaction one can drive the Hartree-Fock minimum from a symmetry-breaking state to a symmetry-conserving state (also referred to as a ``phase transition'' in the literature). The order of the transition is important when one applies the random-phase approximation (RPA) to the of the Hartree-Fock wave function: if first order, RPA is stable through the transition, but if second-order, then the RPA amplitudes become large and lead to unphysical results. The latter is known as ``collapse'' of the RPA. While the difference between first- and second-order transitions in the RPA was first pointed out by Thouless, we present for the first time nontrivial examples of both first- and second-order transitions in a uniform model, the interacting shell-model, where we can compare to exact numerical results.

G. Puddu

Analogies and differences between the random phase approximation (RPA) and the Gaussian approximation at finite temperature are discussed. A comparison is made for Hartree and Hartree-Fock temperature dependent mean fields. Some ambiguities, in the definition of the Hartree mean field and in the relative correction, are analyzed. In a solvable model with a repulsive potential, the Gaussian approximation and the RPA, both built from the Hartree mean field, are found more reliable than the RPA built from a Hartree-Fock mean field.

Stella M. Peltier, A. Piastino