Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review C

Similarities and differences between the Gaussian and random phase approximation for the partition function

G. Puddu

Published Jan 1, 1994• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Analogies and differences between the random phase approximation (RPA) and the Gaussian approximation at finite temperature are discussed. A comparison is made for Hartree and Hartree-Fock temperature dependent mean fields. Some ambiguities, in the definition of the Hartree mean field and in the relative correction, are analyzed. In a solvable model with a repulsive potential, the Gaussian approximation and the RPA, both built from the Hartree mean field, are found more reliable than the RPA built from a Hartree-Fock mean field.

DOI
10.1103/physrevc.49.131

Related papers

Exact Single-Particle Green Functions of Fermi Systems Without Using Bosonization or Are Hartree-Fock and Random Phase Approximations 'Controlled Approximations' ?

Girish S. Setlur, Yia-Chung Chang

In this article, we revisit the question of the validity of Hartree-Fock and random-phase approximations. We show that there is a connection between the two and while the RPA as it is known in much of the physics literature is of limited validity, there is a generalised sense in which the random phase approximation is of much wider applicability including to systems that do not possess Fermi surfaces. The main conclusion is that the Hartree-Fock approximation is a mean-field idea applied to the density operator, and the random-phase approximation is a mean-field idea applied to the number operator. The generalised RPA is used to compute single-particle properties such as momentum distribution and spectral functions. It is found that we have to go beyond the generalised RPA and include fluctuations in the momentum distribution in order to recover a nonzero imaginary part of the one-particle self energy, which is also explicitly computed, all this in any number of spatial dimensions and no bosonization is needed.

arXiv:cond-mat/9810043•Oct 5, 1998•0 citations

Random phase approximation vs exact shell-model correlation energies

Ionel Stetcu, Calvin W. Johnson

The random phase approximation (RPA) builds in correlations left out by mean-field theory. In full $0\ensuremath{\Elzxh}\ensuremath{\omega}$ shell-model spaces we calculate the Hartree-Fock $(\mathrm{HF})+\mathrm{RPA}$ binding energy, and compare it to exact diagonalization. We find that often, but not always, the $\mathrm{HF}+\mathrm{RPA}$ gives a good approximation to the ``exact'' ground state energy. In those cases where the RPA is less satisfactory, however, there is no obvious correlation with properties of the HF state, such as deformation or overlap with the exact ground state wave function. This weakens the reliability of the RPA for computing binding energies.

arXiv:nucl-th/0205029•Physical Review C•Sep 3, 2002•37 citations

Canonical treatment of fluctuations and random phase approximation correlations at finite temperature

N. Canosa, R. Rossignoli, Peter A. Ring

The static path plus random phase approximation (SPA+RPA) to the partition function is formulated exactly in a canonical ensemble, for the case of a density decomposition of an arbitrary two-body Hamiltonian. The canonical mean field plus RPA approach is also discussed. Numerical results are shown for a quadrupole interaction, where excellent agreement with the exact canonical results for a light nucleus is obtained. An effective canonical mean field plus RPA approach is in this case also developed, which avoids the sharp phase transition of the ordinary mean field and provides a reliable estimate of full SPA+RPA results.

Physical Review C•Jan 1, 1999•11 citations

Description of Mixed States Based on the Time-Dependent Hartree-Fock Theory. III: Random Phase Approximation and Its First order Corrections

A. Kuriyama, João da Providência, M. Yamamura

Following Parts I and II, the random phase approximation for mixed states if formulated. For comparison, the random phase approximation based on the standard formulation of thermo field dynamics, which is in a closed connection to the idea originally presented by Hatsuda, is also given. Further, the first order corrections are discussed.

Progress of Theoretical Physics•Jan 1, 1992•0 citations

Scalar ground-state observables in the random phase approximation

Calvin W. Johnson, Ionel Stetcu

We calculate the ground-state expectation value of scalar observables in the matrix formulation of the random phase approximation (RPA). Our expression, derived using the quasiboson approximation, is a straightforward generalization of the RPA correlation energy. We test the reliability of our expression by comparing against full diagonalization in $0\ensuremath{\Elzxh}\ensuremath{\omega}$ shell-model spaces. In general the RPA values are an improvement over mean-field (Hartree-Fock) results, but are not always consistent with shell-model results. We also consider exact symmetries broken in the mean-field state and whether or not they are restored in RPA.

arXiv:nucl-th/0208025•Physical Review C•Dec 4, 2002•7 citations

Description of Mixed States Based on the Time-Dependent Hartree-Fock Theory. III

A. Kuriyama, João da Providência, Masatoshi Yamamura

Following Parts I and II, the random phase approximation for mixed states if formulated. For comparison, the random phase approximation based on the standard formulation of thermo field dynamics, which is in a closed connection to the idea originally presented by Hatsuda, is also given. Further, the first order corrections are discussed.

Progress of Theoretical Physics•Jan 1, 1992•0 citations
Analogies and differences between the random phase approximation (RPA) and the Gaussian approximation at finite temperature are discussed. A comparison is made for Hartree and Hartree-Fock temperature dependent mean fields. Some ambiguities, in the definition of the Hartree mean field and in the relative correction, are analyzed. In a solvable model with a repulsive potential, the Gaussian approximation and the RPA, both built from the Hartree mean field, are found more reliable than the RPA built from a Hartree-Fock mean field.
In this article, we revisit the question of the validity of Hartree-Fock and random-phase approximations. We show that there is a connection between the two and while the RPA as it is known in much of the physics literature is of limited validity, there is a generalised sense in which the random phase approximation is of much wider applicability including to systems that do not possess Fermi surfaces. The main conclusion is that the Hartree-Fock approximation is a mean-field idea applied to the density operator, and the random-phase approximation is a mean-field idea applied to the number operator. The generalised RPA is used to compute single-particle properties such as momentum distribution and spectral functions. It is found that we have to go beyond the generalised RPA and include fluctuations in the momentum distribution in order to recover a nonzero imaginary part of the one-particle self energy, which is also explicitly computed, all this in any number of spatial dimensions and no bosonization is needed.
The random phase approximation (RPA) builds in correlations left out by mean-field theory. In full $0\ensuremath{\Elzxh}\ensuremath{\omega}$ shell-model spaces we calculate the Hartree-Fock (HF)+RPA(\mathrm{HF})+\mathrm{RPA}(HF)+RPA binding energy, and compare it to exact diagonalization. We find that often, but not always, the HF+RPA\mathrm{HF}+\mathrm{RPA}HF+RPA gives a good approximation to the ``exact'' ground state energy. In those cases where the RPA is less satisfactory, however, there is no obvious correlation with properties of the HF state, such as deformation or overlap with the exact ground state wave function. This weakens the reliability of the RPA for computing binding energies.
The static path plus random phase approximation (SPA+RPA) to the partition function is formulated exactly in a canonical ensemble, for the case of a density decomposition of an arbitrary two-body Hamiltonian. The canonical mean field plus RPA approach is also discussed. Numerical results are shown for a quadrupole interaction, where excellent agreement with the exact canonical results for a light nucleus is obtained. An effective canonical mean field plus RPA approach is in this case also developed, which avoids the sharp phase transition of the ordinary mean field and provides a reliable estimate of full SPA+RPA results.
We calculate the ground-state expectation value of scalar observables in the matrix formulation of the random phase approximation (RPA). Our expression, derived using the quasiboson approximation, is a straightforward generalization of the RPA correlation energy. We test the reliability of our expression by comparing against full diagonalization in $0\ensuremath{\Elzxh}\ensuremath{\omega}$ shell-model spaces. In general the RPA values are an improvement over mean-field (Hartree-Fock) results, but are not always consistent with shell-model results. We also consider exact symmetries broken in the mean-field state and whether or not they are restored in RPA.