Various quasiprobability distributions have been developed in the past using the Hilbert space of the single-mode light field. The development of a quasiprobability distribution associated with a phase operator has previously been impossible because of the absence of a unique Hermitian phase operator defined on the Hilbert space. Recently, however, Pegg and Barnett [Europhys. Lett. 6, 483 (1988); Phys. Rev. A 39, 1665 (1989)] and Barnett and Pegg [J. Mod. Optics 36, 7 (1989)] introduced a new formalism that does allow the construction of a Hermitian phase operator and associated phase eigenstates. In this paper we develop a quasiprobability distribution associated with the number and phase operators of the single-mode light field in the new formalism. The new distribution, which we call the number-phase Wigner function, has properties analogous to the Wigner function. We also derive the number-phase Wigner representation of number states, phase states, general physical states, coherent states, and the squeezed vacuum. We find this new representation has features that are related to the number and phase properties of states. For example, the number-phase Wigner representation of a number state is nonzero only on a circle, while the representation of a phase state is only nonzero along a radial line.
In Chapter 4, we introduced the concept of the photon number representation of the electromagnetic (EM) field that is based on the number states, the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian of the EM field. However, this is not the only possible representation, in fact not always the most convenient. In this chapter, we introduce the concept of phase space representations of a quantum system which is in a state described by the density operator ρˆ. The density operator of a given system encodes classical as well as non-classical (quantum) properties of the system. How to distinguish these two kinds of properties is of basic importance in quantum optics. Therefore, we shall address this issue by using representations of the density operator that are based on the parametric space of complex eigenvalues of the annihilation operator aˆ in a coherent state |α〉. We first determine what we mean by the density operator of a quantum system and discuss its basic properties. Next, we introduce different representations of the density operator in terms of coherent state projectors |α〉〈α|. The representations show that a state of the EM field or of an arbitrary quantum system may be regarded as a mixture of coherent states. Along the way, we will learn how to find the P , Q and Wigner representations of the density operator, what are their properties, how to interpret the properties and how to calculate relations between the different representations. Most importantly, certain field states exhibit non- classical features and these non-classical features can be manifested in the phase space representations. Accordingly, we will learn how the representations are very convenient tools to describe quantum states of simple systems.
The phase associated with a single mode of the electromagnetic field is complementary to the photon number. This simple idea leads us to construct a probability density for the phase. The phase operator cannot be represented exactly in the usual-infinite Hilbert space but can be constructed in a subspace of it and provides a valid representation of phase if used together with a suitable limiting procedure. We introduce the Hermitian optical phase operator and describe some of its most important properties. We also provide brief discussions of some alternative approaches to the phase problem and to the question of phase measurements. The paper concludes with an extensive bibliography.
The correct description of the phase variable in quantum mechanics is a question rooted in its earliest formulations. The atom mechanics [1] of Bohr and Sommerfeld—the precursor of modern quantum mechanics—ascribes a central role to action-angle variables. However, Heisenberg's matrix mechanics and Schrödinger's wave mechanics are formulated [2] in terms of the canonical variables representing cartesian coordinates and momenta. Stimulated by this work London [3] attempted a reformulation of these theories in the previously favored action-angle variables. However, this attempt failed due to the difficulty in ascribing quantum operators to the angle variables of classical theory. Despite these difficulties London found [4] an operator representation of the complex exponential of these angle variables. The quantum phase of light made its first appearance in Dirac's classic paper [5] on the quantization of the radiation field. In contrast to modern methods, he constructed the annihilation and creation operators for each field mode from the corresponding amplitude and phase operators. Phase and its quantum nature acquired new significance with the development of lasers in the early sixties: theoretical investigations highlighted significant problems with Dirac's original proposal for the phase operator. A particularly elegant illustration of the difficulty was given by Louisell [6] in 1963. The advent of phase sensitive quantum noise as demonstrated experimentally in the production and detection of squeezed light [7] has created a new wave of interest in the nature of quantum optical phase leading to the discovery of the hermitian optical phase operator [8]. There has followed an explosion of theoretical activity in this area stimulating fresh experimental investigations. In preparing this special issue we have attempted to present the current state of this active and rapidly moving field. We have arranged the papers into what we hope is a coherent representation of the field. The first papers give a historical perspective and overview of current thinking. The two recent experimental investigations which follow are intimately connected to the phase space description of quantum mechanics based on quasi-probability distributions. The representa tion of phase via phase space and its connection with phase-dependent measurements and the phase operator are addressed in the next section. Some more formal considerations pertinent to phase are presented in the following section. Gravitational wave detection and optical communication have motivated the study of the limits of phase noise. Some recent investigations on such optimal phase states are presented. The issue concludes with two papers discussing the significance of phase in light-matter interactions. In concluding we express our gratitude to the authors of the papers in this volume for their efforts in preparing their high quality presentations.
We define a quasiprobability distribution
SNP(n,\ensuremath{\theta}) which describes the quantum statistics of the photon number and phase observables of a single-mode field (or, equivalently, a harmonic oscillator). The properties of
SNP(n,\ensuremath{\theta}) are the photon number and phase analogies of the properties of Wigner's original function, which describes the position and momentum observables. For example, the marginals of
SNP(n,\ensuremath{\theta}) are the continuous phase and the discrete photon-number probability distributions. We give examples of the
SNP(n,\ensuremath{\theta}) representation of various states and show, in particular, that
SNP(n,\ensuremath{\theta}) displays the quantum interference associated with Schr\"odinger cat states. We also describe how
SNP(n,\ensuremath{\theta}) can be determined from quantities that are, in principle, measurable.