Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

A Classical Spin on Quantized Angular Momentum

Dallin Durfee, James L. Archibald

Published Dec 31, 2011• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

We present an intuition-building activity for the quantum description of angular momentum. Using concepts of orthogonality in space and linear independence, we can logically deduce the relationships between the three spatially orthogonal basis sets of the spin-1/2 system. Rather than a mathematically rigorous derivation, the relationships are found by enforcing properties we expect the basis states to have. The process highlights the correspondence of quantized spin state properties with classical notions of orthogonality, illustrating differences and connections between geometrical space and Hilbert space and dispelling misconceptions often held by students.

Related papers

Applying classical geometry intuition to quantum spin

Dallin Durfee, James L. Archibald

Using concepts of geometric orthogonality and linear independence, we logically deduce the form of the Pauli spin matrices and the relationships between the three spatially orthogonal basis sets of the spin-1/2 system. Rather than a mathematically rigorous derivation, the relationships are found by forcing expectation values of the different basis states to have the properties we expect of a classical, geometric coordinate system. The process highlights the correspondence of quantum angular momentum with classical notions of geometric orthogonality, even for the inherently non-classical spin-1/2 system. In the process, differences in and connections between geometrical space and Hilbert space are illustrated.

arXiv:1201.0302•European Journal of Physics•Jul 20, 2016•3 citations

Spin and rotation

Benjamin W. Schumacher, Michael D. Westmoreland

Spin-s systems Angular momentum is one of the fundamental quantities of Newtonian physics, and in quantum physics its importance is at least as great. In quantum mechanics we often distinguish between two types of angular momentum: orbital angular momentum , which a system of particles possesses due to particle motion through space; and spin angular momentum , which is an intrinsic property of a particle. The distinction will be important later, but for now we will ignore it. We will here refer to angular momentum of any sort as “spin” and develop general-purpose mathematical tools for its description. We have already dealt with spin systems, particularly the example of a spin-½ particle. Our approach began with the empirical observation that a measurement of any spin component of a spin-½ particle could yield only the results +ħ/2 or −ħ/2. We introduced the basis states | z ±〉 for the two-dimensional Hilbert space ℋ. We also gave other basis states such as {| x ±〉} and {| y ±〉} in terms of the | z ±〉 states. From basis states and measurement values we constructed operators for the spin components S x , S y , and S z . With the operators in hand, we could then examine the algebraic relations between them (such as the commutation relation in Exercise 3.56). Our job here is to generalize our analysis to systems of arbitrary spin. To do this, we will reverse our chain of logic.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Mar 25, 2010•0 citations

Angular Momentum and Spin

Gennaro Auletta, Shang-Yung Wang

In this chapter we shall treat two of the most important observables of quantum mechanical systems: angular momentum and spin. We shall argue that angular momentum is the generator of rotations. In quantummechanics, angular momentum is quantized in units of the reduced Planck constant. The quantization of angular momentum is dealt with by finding the angular momentum eigenvalues and eigenstates. We shall then apply the theory of angular momentum to study the hydrogen atom. Spin is an intrinsic angular momentum of subatomic particles and therefore corresponds to an important intrinsic degree of freedom. We shall discuss briefly how spin was discovered and many of its important properties. Finally, we shall also explore here some further subtleties of quantum theory.a When we consider quantum systems in two or three spatial dimensions, we need to take into account also the effect of rotations. In this case, we need to introduce a physical quantity called the angular momentum, that is, themomentum induced by or connected with rotations. In classical physics the angular momentum of a particle about a given origin is defined by [see Fig. 8.1]

•Jun 20, 2014•1 citation

A classical, elementary approach to the foundations of Quantum Mechanics

David Rodríguez

Elementary particles are found in two different situations: (i) bound to metastable states of matter, for which angular momentum is quantized, and (ii) free, for which, due to their high energy-momentum and leaving aside inner a.m. or spin, the $h$-quantization step is completely harmless. Perhaps Quantum Mechanics can be seen just as the simplest mathematical formalism where angular momentum (the magnitude of each of its three orthogonal projections) is by construction quantized: all possible values are taken from a discrete set. Indeed: (i) This idea finds support in very reasonable, completely classical physical arguments, if we place ourselves in the framework of Stochastic Electrodynamics (SED): there, all sustained periodic movement of a charge must satisfy a power balance that restricts the value of the average angular momentum, on each of its projections. (ii) It gives a natural explanation of the concept of "photon", as a constraint on the observable spectrum of energy-momentum exchanges between metastable physical states, in particular also for its discreteness. QM would be, in this picture, a semi-static theory, transparent to all the (micro)-dynamics taking place between apparently "discrete" events (transitions in the state of the system). For instance, (the magnitude of the projections of) quantum angular momentum would only reflect average values over a (classical) cyclic trajectory, a fact that we regard as almost obvious given the particularity of the corresponding addition rules in QM.

arXiv:1112.3369•Dec 13, 2011•0 citations

Elementary introduction to the properties of angular momentum operators through three-dimensional rotations

C. Leubner

For pedagogical purposes it is demonstrated that with little effort the customary discussion of rotations in introductory courses can be extended to naturally produce a number of angular momentum operator properties, if coordinate-free rotation operators are used in their exponential form. This form gives rise to a particularly useful coordinate-free representation of the generators of rotations in three-space, from which the student can derive the usual angular momentum formalism for the case j=1 by elementary vector algebra alone. Since in this approach the j=1 formalism appears as a set of relations among simple geometric objects in ordinary space, it admits of a geometric interpretation and will leave the student better prepared for a more profound appreciation of the abstract concepts of the full theory.

American Journal of Physics•Aug 1, 1980•0 citations

Angular momentum

P. C. W. Davies, David S. Betts

One of the most important applications of the quantum mechanical formalism developed in the previous chapter is to angular momentum. This is because many microsystems are spherically symmetric, or approximately so, and angular momentum is therefore conserved. This chapter discusses that a careful study of quantized angular momentum leads to a completely new physical phenomenon – intrinsic spin. The fact that the angular momentum vector of a quantum particle must point in certain restricted directions is a bizarre quantum property. In some respects the abstract idea of an internal angular momentum is reminiscent of the classical concept of a spinning body. In classical mechanics angular momentum is added vectorially but in the quantum case the issue is more subtle. The procedure will be illustrated by the example of the addition of two spins. As in classical mechanics a charged quantum system with angular momentum possesses a magnetic moment μ.

Routledge eBooks•Apr 27, 2018•0 citations
We present an intuition-building activity for the quantum description of angular momentum. Using concepts of orthogonality in space and linear independence, we can logically deduce the relationships between the three spatially orthogonal basis sets of the spin-1/2 system. Rather than a mathematically rigorous derivation, the relationships are found by enforcing properties we expect the basis states to have. The process highlights the correspondence of quantized spin state properties with classical notions of orthogonality, illustrating differences and connections between geometrical space and Hilbert space and dispelling misconceptions often held by students.
Using concepts of geometric orthogonality and linear independence, we logically deduce the form of the Pauli spin matrices and the relationships between the three spatially orthogonal basis sets of the spin-1/2 system. Rather than a mathematically rigorous derivation, the relationships are found by forcing expectation values of the different basis states to have the properties we expect of a classical, geometric coordinate system. The process highlights the correspondence of quantum angular momentum with classical notions of geometric orthogonality, even for the inherently non-classical spin-1/2 system. In the process, differences in and connections between geometrical space and Hilbert space are illustrated.
Spin-s systems Angular momentum is one of the fundamental quantities of Newtonian physics, and in quantum physics its importance is at least as great. In quantum mechanics we often distinguish between two types of angular momentum: orbital angular momentum , which a system of particles possesses due to particle motion through space; and spin angular momentum , which is an intrinsic property of a particle. The distinction will be important later, but for now we will ignore it. We will here refer to angular momentum of any sort as “spin” and develop general-purpose mathematical tools for its description. We have already dealt with spin systems, particularly the example of a spin-½ particle. Our approach began with the empirical observation that a measurement of any spin component of a spin-½ particle could yield only the results +ħ/2 or −ħ/2. We introduced the basis states | z ±〉 for the two-dimensional Hilbert space ℋ. We also gave other basis states such as {| x ±〉} and {| y ±〉} in terms of the | z ±〉 states. From basis states and measurement values we constructed operators for the spin components S x , S y , and S z . With the operators in hand, we could then examine the algebraic relations between them (such as the commutation relation in Exercise 3.56). Our job here is to generalize our analysis to systems of arbitrary spin. To do this, we will reverse our chain of logic.
In this chapter we shall treat two of the most important observables of quantum mechanical systems: angular momentum and spin. We shall argue that angular momentum is the generator of rotations. In quantummechanics, angular momentum is quantized in units of the reduced Planck constant. The quantization of angular momentum is dealt with by finding the angular momentum eigenvalues and eigenstates. We shall then apply the theory of angular momentum to study the hydrogen atom. Spin is an intrinsic angular momentum of subatomic particles and therefore corresponds to an important intrinsic degree of freedom. We shall discuss briefly how spin was discovered and many of its important properties. Finally, we shall also explore here some further subtleties of quantum theory.a When we consider quantum systems in two or three spatial dimensions, we need to take into account also the effect of rotations. In this case, we need to introduce a physical quantity called the angular momentum, that is, themomentum induced by or connected with rotations. In classical physics the angular momentum of a particle about a given origin is defined by [see Fig. 8.1]
Elementary particles are found in two different situations: (i) bound to metastable states of matter, for which angular momentum is quantized, and (ii) free, for which, due to their high energy-momentum and leaving aside inner a.m. or spin, the hhh-quantization step is completely harmless. Perhaps Quantum Mechanics can be seen just as the simplest mathematical formalism where angular momentum (the magnitude of each of its three orthogonal projections) is by construction quantized: all possible values are taken from a discrete set. Indeed: (i) This idea finds support in very reasonable, completely classical physical arguments, if we place ourselves in the framework of Stochastic Electrodynamics (SED): there, all sustained periodic movement of a charge must satisfy a power balance that restricts the value of the average angular momentum, on each of its projections. (ii) It gives a natural explanation of the concept of "photon", as a constraint on the observable spectrum of energy-momentum exchanges between metastable physical states, in particular also for its discreteness. QM would be, in this picture, a semi-static theory, transparent to all the (micro)-dynamics taking place between apparently "discrete" events (transitions in the state of the system). For instance, (the magnitude of the projections of) quantum angular momentum would only reflect average values over a (classical) cyclic trajectory, a fact that we regard as almost obvious given the particularity of the corresponding addition rules in QM.
For pedagogical purposes it is demonstrated that with little effort the customary discussion of rotations in introductory courses can be extended to naturally produce a number of angular momentum operator properties, if coordinate-free rotation operators are used in their exponential form. This form gives rise to a particularly useful coordinate-free representation of the generators of rotations in three-space, from which the student can derive the usual angular momentum formalism for the case j=1 by elementary vector algebra alone. Since in this approach the j=1 formalism appears as a set of relations among simple geometric objects in ordinary space, it admits of a geometric interpretation and will leave the student better prepared for a more profound appreciation of the abstract concepts of the full theory.
One of the most important applications of the quantum mechanical formalism developed in the previous chapter is to angular momentum. This is because many microsystems are spherically symmetric, or approximately so, and angular momentum is therefore conserved. This chapter discusses that a careful study of quantized angular momentum leads to a completely new physical phenomenon – intrinsic spin. The fact that the angular momentum vector of a quantum particle must point in certain restricted directions is a bizarre quantum property. In some respects the abstract idea of an internal angular momentum is reminiscent of the classical concept of a spinning body. In classical mechanics angular momentum is added vectorially but in the quantum case the issue is more subtle. The procedure will be illustrated by the example of the addition of two spins. As in classical mechanics a charged quantum system with angular momentum possesses a magnetic moment μ.