Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Functional derivative of the universal density functional in Fock space

Federico E. Zahariev, Yan Alexander Wang

Published Oct 18, 2004• 29 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Within the framework of zero-temperature Fock-space density-functional theory (DFT), we prove that the G\^ateaux functional derivative of the universal density functional, ${\ensuremath{\delta}{F}^{\ensuremath{\lambda}}[\ensuremath{\rho}]∕\ensuremath{\delta}\ensuremath{\rho}(\mathbit{r})\ensuremath{\mid}}_{\ensuremath{\rho}={\ensuremath{\rho}}_{0}}$, at ground-state densities with arbitrary normalizations $(⟨{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{0}(\mathbit{r})⟩=n∊{\mathcal{R}}_{+})$ and an electron-electron interaction strength $\ensuremath{\lambda}$, is uniquely defined, but is discontinuous when the number of electrons $n$ becomes an integer, thus providing a mathematically rigorous confirmation for the ``derivative discontinuity'' initially discovered by Perdew et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1691 (1982)]. However, the functional derivative of the exchange-correlation functional is continuous with respect to the number of electrons in Fock space; i.e., there is no ``derivative discontinuity'' for the exchange-correlation functional at an integer electron number. For a ground-state density ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{0,n}^{v,\ensuremath{\lambda}}(\mathbit{r})$ of an external potential $v(\mathbit{r})$, we show that ${\ensuremath{\delta}{F}^{\ensuremath{\lambda}}[\ensuremath{\rho}]∕\ensuremath{\delta}\ensuremath{\rho}(\mathbit{r})\ensuremath{\mid}}_{\ensuremath{\rho}={\ensuremath{\rho}}_{0,n}^{v,\ensuremath{\lambda}}}={\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\mathrm{SM}}^{n}\ensuremath{-}v(\mathbit{r})$, where the constant ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\mathrm{SM}}^{n}$ is given by the following chain of dependences: ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{0,n}^{v,\ensuremath{\lambda}}(\mathbit{r})\ensuremath{\mapsto}[v]\ensuremath{\mapsto}{E}_{0}^{v,\ensuremath{\lambda}}(n)\ensuremath{\mapsto}{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\mathrm{SM}}^{n}={\ensuremath{\partial}{E}_{0}^{v,\ensuremath{\lambda}}(k)∕\ensuremath{\partial}k\ensuremath{\mid}}_{k=n}$. Here $[v]$ is the class of the external potential $v(\mathbit{r})$ up to a real constant, and ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\mathrm{SM}}^{n}$ is the chemical potential defined according to statistical mechanics. At an integer electron number $N$, we find that there is no freedom of adding an arbitrary constant to the value of the chemical potential ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\mathrm{SM}}^{N}$, whose exact value is generally not the popular preference of the negative of Mulliken's electronegativity, $\ensuremath{-}\frac{1}{2}(I+A)$, where $I$ and $A$ are the first ionization potential and the first electron affinity, respectively. In addition, for any external potential converging to the same constant at infinity in all directions, we resolve that ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\mathrm{SM}}^{N}=\ensuremath{-}I$. Finally, the equality ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\mathrm{DFT}}={\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\mathrm{SM}}^{n}$ is rigorously derived via an alternative route, where ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\mathrm{DFT}}$ is the Lagrangian multiplier used to constrain the normalization of the density in the traditional DFT approach.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.70.042503

Related papers

Density-functional derivative discontinuities at the maximum number of bound electrons

Daniel Whitenack, Yu Zhang, Adam Wasserman

For every electronic many-body Hamiltonian with a one-body potential that goes to zero at infinity, there is a maximum number of bound electrons (${J}_{\mathrm{max}}$) that can be sustained in the system with an infinite lifetime. At this integer ${J}_{\mathrm{max}}$, the derivative discontinuity in the exact energy of ensemble density functional theory (DFT) is ill defined. However, we investigate the derivative discontinuity of the energy within the framework of density functional resonance theory [D. L. Whitenack and A. Wasserman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 163002 (2011)], which reduces to ground-state DFT as a coordinate scaling parameter is taken to zero, and find that the exact exchange-correlation potential experiences discontinuous jumps at integer particle numbers, including ${J}_{\mathrm{max}}$. For integers below ${J}_{\mathrm{max}}$ the jump is purely real because of the real shift in the chemical potential. At ${J}_{\mathrm{max}}$, the jump has a nonzero imaginary component reflecting the metastability of the system upon addition of one more electron. In addition, the magnitude of the derivative discontinuity at ${J}_{\mathrm{max}}$ is larger than would have been expected by simply setting the affinity to zero.

Physical Review A•Apr 5, 2012•5 citations

Comment on “Functional derivative of the universal density functional in Fock space”

Espen Sagvolden, John P. Perdew, Mel Levy

Zahariev and Wang [Phys. Rev. A, 70, 042503 (2004)] discuss the density functional theory of noninteger average particle numbers. Among their many results is one we dispute: that the exact exchange-correlation potential (more precisely, the exact functional derivative of the exchange-correlation energy with respect to the density) cannot have a discontinuity as the particle number crosses an integer, in contradiction to works by two of us (J.P.P. and M.L.) in collaboration with co-workers [Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1691 (1982); Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 1884 (1983)] and by Sham and Schl\"uter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1888 (1983)]. We point to a counterexample to Zahariev and Wang's claim, which two of us (E.S. and J.P.P.) have presented in a separate paper: A rigorous proof that, in the absence of external magnetic fields, the exchange-correlation potential jumps by the difference between the ionization potential $(I)$ and electron affinity $(A)$ when the particle number crosses 1, given that $I\ensuremath{\geqslant}A$. We point out that Zahariev and Wang's derivation neglects an order-of-limits problem. We also prove that $I>A$ for any one-electron system in the absence of magnetic fields.

Physical Review A•Feb 2, 2009•17 citations

A unified treatment of derivative discontinuity, delocalization and static correlation effects in density functional calculations

Fei Zhou, Vidvuds Ozoliņš

We propose a method that incorporates explicit derivative discontinuity of the total energy with respect to the number of electrons and treats both delocalization and static correlation effects in density functional calculations. Our approach is motivated by the exact behavior of the ground state total energy of electrons and involves minimization of the exchange-correlation energy with respect to the Fock space density matrix. The resulting density matrix minimization (DMM) model is simple to implement and can be solved uniquely and efficiently. In a case study of KCuF$_3$, a prototypical Mott-insulator with strong correlation, LDA+DMM correctly reproduced the Mott-Hubbard gap, magnetic ordering and Jahn-Teller distortion.

arXiv:1710.08973•Oct 24, 2017•2 citations

The ground-state energy and external potential as functionals of the electron density and their derivatives

Tamás Gál

It is shown that the ground-state energy as a functional solely of the electron density is determined by the asymptotic value of the derivative of the degree-one homogeneous extension of the universal density functional F[n] at the given electron number. This has the consequence that its derivative cannot be properly determined. Carrying out the derivative of E[n[N,v]] with respect to v(r) leads to a paradox, which is resolved by the non-differentiability of E[n] if one follows traditional wisdom regarding the non-invertibility of the linear response function. However, considering the derivative of v[n[v]] through the one-electron case shows that this paradox has a more elementary origin, namely, an unaccounted restriction of the v(r) domain.

arXiv:1108.3865•Aug 18, 2011•1 citation

Differentiability of energy functionals in spin-density-functional theory

Tamás Gál

Recently, nonuniqueness of external electrostatic and magnetic fields yielding a given many-electron ground state has been pointed out [K. Capelle and G. Vignale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5546 (2001); H. Eschrig and W. E. Pickett, Solid State Commun. 118, 123 (2001)], implying the nondifferentiability of the ground-state energy functional of spin-density-functional theory (SDFT), on the basis of which the applicability of widely used DFT methods in SDFT has been put into question and the need for a critical reexamination of those applications has been concluded. Here it is shown, for collinear magnetic fields, that the nonuniqueness of the external potentials in SDFT does not imply the nonexistence of number-conserving functional derivatives as well, with the use of which therefore problems arising from the nondifferentiability are avoided.

Physical Review B•Jun 22, 2007•4 citations

Many-electron theory: Density functional approach generalized to treat spin eigenfunctions and relation to spinless low-order density matrices

N. H. March

Many-electron theory is treated here with much attention focused on the synthesis of the density functional and density matrix theory. This synthesis shows that the exchange–correlation potential, normally obtained as the functional derivative with respect to the electron density of an assumed approximate exchange–correlation energy, can be written exactly in terms of the “near-diagonal” behavior of the fully interacting first-order density matrix and the diagonal of the second-order density matrix, thereby bypassing the functional derivative. Also involved, since the exchange–correlation potential is an “artifact” of reducing the many-electron Schrödinger equation to one-body Slater–Kohn–Sham equations, are the one-body orbitals derived from these latter equations, not just the density thereby obtained. This situation has then motivated a discussion of what constraints are placed on the low-order density matrices of atoms and molecules, described by an assumed spin-independent Hamiltonian, by the requirement that these matrices are constructed from an N-electron wave function which is an eigenfunction of the spin operators S2 and Sz. Some briefer discussion is added on the optimally convergent determinantal expansion of such an N-electron wave function, the relation between Brueckner and Löwdin natural orbitals being commented on as a by-product. In this latter context, it is noted that the exchange-only potential of density functional theory can be represented as a sum of two line integrals, each of which is path-dependent, the sum being, of course, path-independent. But in addition to knowledge of Slater–Kohn–Sham orbitals appearing as in the Harbola–Sahni exchange-only potential (which is one of the path-dependent terms), there is a kinetic correction. This involves Löwdin natural orbitals and their occupation numbers, but only now in the weak coupling limit of the electron–electron interaction, as emphasized in the kinetic “correction” to the Harbola–Sahni formula exhibited by Levy and the writer. Some directions for further work are briefly set out. ©1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J Quant Chem 74: 163–176, 1999

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Jan 1, 1999•2 citations
Within the framework of zero-temperature Fock-space density-functional theory (DFT), we prove that the G^ateaux functional derivative of the universal density functional, \ensuremathδF\ensuremathλ[\ensuremathρ]∕\ensuremathδ\ensuremathρ(\mathbitr)\ensuremath∣\ensuremathρ=\ensuremathρ0{\ensuremath{\delta}{F}^{\ensuremath{\lambda}}[\ensuremath{\rho}]∕\ensuremath{\delta}\ensuremath{\rho}(\mathbit{r})\ensuremath{\mid}}_{\ensuremath{\rho}={\ensuremath{\rho}}_{0}}\ensuremathδF\ensuremathλ[\ensuremathρ]∕\ensuremathδ\ensuremathρ(\mathbitr)\ensuremath∣\ensuremathρ=\ensuremathρ0​​, at ground-state densities with arbitrary normalizations (⟨\ensuremathρ0(\mathbitr)⟩=n∊R+)(⟨{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{0}(\mathbit{r})⟩=n∊{\mathcal{R}}_{+})(⟨\ensuremathρ0​(\mathbitr)⟩=n∊R+​) and an electron-electron interaction strength \ensuremathλ\ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremathλ, is uniquely defined, but is discontinuous when the number of electrons nnn becomes an integer, thus providing a mathematically rigorous confirmation for the derivative discontinuity'' initially discovered by Perdew et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1691 (1982)]. However, the functional derivative of the exchange-correlation functional is continuous with respect to the number of electrons in Fock space; i.e., there is no derivative discontinuity'' for the exchange-correlation functional at an integer electron number. For a ground-state density \ensuremathρ0,nv,\ensuremathλ(\mathbitr){\ensuremath{\rho}}_{0,n}^{v,\ensuremath{\lambda}}(\mathbit{r})\ensuremathρ0,nv,\ensuremathλ​(\mathbitr) of an external potential v(\mathbitr)v(\mathbit{r})v(\mathbitr), we show that \ensuremathδF\ensuremathλ[\ensuremathρ]∕\ensuremathδ\ensuremathρ(\mathbitr)\ensuremath∣\ensuremathρ=\ensuremathρ0,nv,\ensuremathλ=\ensuremathμSMn\ensuremath−v(\mathbitr){\ensuremath{\delta}{F}^{\ensuremath{\lambda}}[\ensuremath{\rho}]∕\ensuremath{\delta}\ensuremath{\rho}(\mathbit{r})\ensuremath{\mid}}_{\ensuremath{\rho}={\ensuremath{\rho}}_{0,n}^{v,\ensuremath{\lambda}}}={\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\mathrm{SM}}^{n}\ensuremath{-}v(\mathbit{r})\ensuremathδF\ensuremathλ[\ensuremathρ]∕\ensuremathδ\ensuremathρ(\mathbitr)\ensuremath∣\ensuremathρ=\ensuremathρ0,nv,\ensuremathλ​​=\ensuremathμSMn​\ensuremath−v(\mathbitr), where the constant \ensuremathμSMn{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\mathrm{SM}}^{n}\ensuremathμSMn​ is given by the following chain of dependences: \ensuremathρ0,nv,\ensuremathλ(\mathbitr)\ensuremath↦[v]\ensuremath↦E0v,\ensuremathλ(n)\ensuremath↦\ensuremathμSMn=\ensuremath∂E0v,\ensuremathλ(k)∕\ensuremath∂k\ensuremath∣k=n{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{0,n}^{v,\ensuremath{\lambda}}(\mathbit{r})\ensuremath{\mapsto}[v]\ensuremath{\mapsto}{E}_{0}^{v,\ensuremath{\lambda}}(n)\ensuremath{\mapsto}{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\mathrm{SM}}^{n}={\ensuremath{\partial}{E}_{0}^{v,\ensuremath{\lambda}}(k)∕\ensuremath{\partial}k\ensuremath{\mid}}_{k=n}\ensuremathρ0,nv,\ensuremathλ​(\mathbitr)\ensuremath↦[v]\ensuremath↦E0v,\ensuremathλ​(n)\ensuremath↦\ensuremathμSMn​=\ensuremath∂E0v,\ensuremathλ​(k)∕\ensuremath∂k\ensuremath∣k=n​. Here [v][v][v] is the class of the external potential v(\mathbitr)v(\mathbit{r})v(\mathbitr) up to a real constant, and \ensuremathμSMn{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\mathrm{SM}}^{n}\ensuremathμSMn​ is the chemical potential defined according to statistical mechanics. At an integer electron number NNN, we find that there is no freedom of adding an arbitrary constant to the value of the chemical potential \ensuremathμSMN{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\mathrm{SM}}^{N}\ensuremathμSMN​, whose exact value is generally not the popular preference of the negative of Mulliken's electronegativity, \ensuremath−12(I+A)\ensuremath{-}\frac{1}{2}(I+A)\ensuremath−21​(I+A), where III and AAA are the first ionization potential and the first electron affinity, respectively. In addition, for any external potential converging to the same constant at infinity in all directions, we resolve that \ensuremathμSMN=\ensuremath−I{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\mathrm{SM}}^{N}=\ensuremath{-}I\ensuremathμSMN​=\ensuremath−I. Finally, the equality \ensuremathμDFT=\ensuremathμSMn{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\mathrm{DFT}}={\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\mathrm{SM}}^{n}\ensuremathμDFT​=\ensuremathμSMn​ is rigorously derived via an alternative route, where \ensuremathμDFT{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\mathrm{DFT}}\ensuremathμDFT​ is the Lagrangian multiplier used to constrain the normalization of the density in the traditional DFT approach.
For every electronic many-body Hamiltonian with a one-body potential that goes to zero at infinity, there is a maximum number of bound electrons (Jmax{J}_{\mathrm{max}}Jmax​) that can be sustained in the system with an infinite lifetime. At this integer Jmax{J}_{\mathrm{max}}Jmax​, the derivative discontinuity in the exact energy of ensemble density functional theory (DFT) is ill defined. However, we investigate the derivative discontinuity of the energy within the framework of density functional resonance theory [D. L. Whitenack and A. Wasserman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 163002 (2011)], which reduces to ground-state DFT as a coordinate scaling parameter is taken to zero, and find that the exact exchange-correlation potential experiences discontinuous jumps at integer particle numbers, including Jmax{J}_{\mathrm{max}}Jmax​. For integers below Jmax{J}_{\mathrm{max}}Jmax​ the jump is purely real because of the real shift in the chemical potential. At Jmax{J}_{\mathrm{max}}Jmax​, the jump has a nonzero imaginary component reflecting the metastability of the system upon addition of one more electron. In addition, the magnitude of the derivative discontinuity at Jmax{J}_{\mathrm{max}}Jmax​ is larger than would have been expected by simply setting the affinity to zero.
Zahariev and Wang [Phys. Rev. A, 70, 042503 (2004)] discuss the density functional theory of noninteger average particle numbers. Among their many results is one we dispute: that the exact exchange-correlation potential (more precisely, the exact functional derivative of the exchange-correlation energy with respect to the density) cannot have a discontinuity as the particle number crosses an integer, in contradiction to works by two of us (J.P.P. and M.L.) in collaboration with co-workers [Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1691 (1982); Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 1884 (1983)] and by Sham and Schl\"uter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1888 (1983)]. We point to a counterexample to Zahariev and Wang's claim, which two of us (E.S. and J.P.P.) have presented in a separate paper: A rigorous proof that, in the absence of external magnetic fields, the exchange-correlation potential jumps by the difference between the ionization potential (I)(I)(I) and electron affinity (A)(A)(A) when the particle number crosses 1, given that $I\ensuremath{\geqslant}A$. We point out that Zahariev and Wang's derivation neglects an order-of-limits problem. We also prove that I>AI>AI>A for any one-electron system in the absence of magnetic fields.
We propose a method that incorporates explicit derivative discontinuity of the total energy with respect to the number of electrons and treats both delocalization and static correlation effects in density functional calculations. Our approach is motivated by the exact behavior of the ground state total energy of electrons and involves minimization of the exchange-correlation energy with respect to the Fock space density matrix. The resulting density matrix minimization (DMM) model is simple to implement and can be solved uniquely and efficiently. In a case study of KCuF3_33​, a prototypical Mott-insulator with strong correlation, LDA+DMM correctly reproduced the Mott-Hubbard gap, magnetic ordering and Jahn-Teller distortion.
It is shown that the ground-state energy as a functional solely of the electron density is determined by the asymptotic value of the derivative of the degree-one homogeneous extension of the universal density functional F[n] at the given electron number. This has the consequence that its derivative cannot be properly determined. Carrying out the derivative of E[n[N,v]] with respect to v(r) leads to a paradox, which is resolved by the non-differentiability of E[n] if one follows traditional wisdom regarding the non-invertibility of the linear response function. However, considering the derivative of v[n[v]] through the one-electron case shows that this paradox has a more elementary origin, namely, an unaccounted restriction of the v(r) domain.
Recently, nonuniqueness of external electrostatic and magnetic fields yielding a given many-electron ground state has been pointed out [K. Capelle and G. Vignale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5546 (2001); H. Eschrig and W. E. Pickett, Solid State Commun. 118, 123 (2001)], implying the nondifferentiability of the ground-state energy functional of spin-density-functional theory (SDFT), on the basis of which the applicability of widely used DFT methods in SDFT has been put into question and the need for a critical reexamination of those applications has been concluded. Here it is shown, for collinear magnetic fields, that the nonuniqueness of the external potentials in SDFT does not imply the nonexistence of number-conserving functional derivatives as well, with the use of which therefore problems arising from the nondifferentiability are avoided.
Many-electron theory is treated here with much attention focused on the synthesis of the density functional and density matrix theory. This synthesis shows that the exchange–correlation potential, normally obtained as the functional derivative with respect to the electron density of an assumed approximate exchange–correlation energy, can be written exactly in terms of the “near-diagonal” behavior of the fully interacting first-order density matrix and the diagonal of the second-order density matrix, thereby bypassing the functional derivative. Also involved, since the exchange–correlation potential is an “artifact” of reducing the many-electron Schrödinger equation to one-body Slater–Kohn–Sham equations, are the one-body orbitals derived from these latter equations, not just the density thereby obtained. This situation has then motivated a discussion of what constraints are placed on the low-order density matrices of atoms and molecules, described by an assumed spin-independent Hamiltonian, by the requirement that these matrices are constructed from an N-electron wave function which is an eigenfunction of the spin operators S2 and Sz. Some briefer discussion is added on the optimally convergent determinantal expansion of such an N-electron wave function, the relation between Brueckner and Löwdin natural orbitals being commented on as a by-product. In this latter context, it is noted that the exchange-only potential of density functional theory can be represented as a sum of two line integrals, each of which is path-dependent, the sum being, of course, path-independent. But in addition to knowledge of Slater–Kohn–Sham orbitals appearing as in the Harbola–Sahni exchange-only potential (which is one of the path-dependent terms), there is a kinetic correction. This involves Löwdin natural orbitals and their occupation numbers, but only now in the weak coupling limit of the electron–electron interaction, as emphasized in the kinetic “correction” to the Harbola–Sahni formula exhibited by Levy and the writer. Some directions for further work are briefly set out. ©1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J Quant Chem 74: 163–176, 1999