Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

New models for mixing wavefunctions with density functional theory

Gustavo E. Scuseria

Published Mar 17, 2010• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

The recent realization that the ground-state correlation energy of the random phase approximation (RPA) is intimately connected to an approximate coupled cluster doubles (CCD) model [1], opens interesting avenues for mixing RPA with DFT [2]. I will describe some of the recent work done in our research group on RPA, including applications to van der waals and noncovalent interactions [3]. Time permitting, I will discuss a new mean-field model for describing static (strong) correlations [4-5].

Related papers

Correlation energy from random phase approximations: A reduced density matrices perspective

Katarzyna Pernal

Abstract Random phase approximation (RPA) electron correlation methods have gained in popularity in the recent years. A number of RPA correlation energy variants emerged in the Kohn–Sham DFT framework and in the theory of strongly orthogonal geminals. Foundations of most RPA approaches trace back to an exact expression for two‐electron reduced density matrix written in terms of one‐electron density matrix and dynamic one‐electron response functions, originally presented in the seminal paper of McLachlan and Ball (Rev. Mod. Phys. 1964, 36, 844). The aim of this article is to give a pedagogical introduction to possible approaches for describing electron correlation energy based on the McLachlan and Ball formula. The focus of the presentation is to formulate electron‐interaction energy expressions as functions of reduced density matrices. On one hand, it provides a common umbrella for RPA approximations proposed for uncorrelated (Hartree–Fock or Kohn–Sham) as well as partially correlated (strongly orthogonal geminals) references. On the other hand, such presentation may stimulate new developments in density matrix functional theory.

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Aug 28, 2017•32 citations

Combination of Wavefunction and Density Functional Approximations for Describing Electronic Correlation

Alejandro Jesus Garza Gonzalez

Perhaps the most important approximations to the electronic structure problem in quantum chemistry are those based on coupled cluster and density functional theories. Coupled cluster theory has been called the ``gold standard'' of quantum chemistry due to the high accuracy that it achieves for weakly correlated systems. Kohn--Sham density functionals based on semilocal approximations are, without a doubt, the most widely used methods in chemistry and material science because of their high accuracy/cost ratio. The root of the success of coupled cluster and density functionals is their ability to efficiently describe the dynamic part of the electron correlation. However, both traditional coupled cluster and density functional approximations may fail catastrophically when substantial static correlation is present. This severely limits the applicability of these methods to a plethora of important chemical and physical problems such as, e.g., the description of bond breaking, transition states, transition metal-, lanthanide- and actinide-containing compounds, and superconductivity. In an attempt to tackle this problem, nonstandard (single-reference) coupled cluster-based techniques that aim to describe static correlation have been recently developed: pair coupled cluster doubles (pCCD) and singlet-paired coupled cluster doubles (CCD0). The ability to describe static correlation in pCCD and CCD0 comes, however, at the expense of important amounts of dynamic correlation so that the high accuracy of standard coupled cluster becomes unattainable. Thus, the reliable and efficient description of static and dynamic correlation in a simultaneous manner remains an open problem for quantum chemistry and many-body theory in general. In this thesis, different ways to combine pCCD and CCD0 with density functionals in order to describe static and dynamic correlation simultaneously (and efficiently) are explored. The combination of wavefunction and density functional methods has a long history in quantum chemistry (practical implementations have appeared in the literature since the 1970s). However, this kind of techniques have not achieved widespread use due to problems such as double counting of correlation and the symmetry dilemma---the fact that wavefunction methods respect the symmetries of Hamiltonian, while modern functionals are designed to work with broken symmetry densities. Here, particular mathematical features of pCCD and CCD0 are exploited to avoid these problems in an efficient manner. The two resulting families of approximations, denoted as pCCD+DFT and CCD0+DFT, are shown to be able to describe static and dynamic correlation in standard benchmark calculations. Furthermore, it is also shown that CCD0+DFT lends itself to combination with correlation from the direct random phase approximation (dRPA). Inclusion of dRPA in the long-range via the technique of range-separation allows for the description of dispersion correlation, the remaining part of the correlation. Thus, when combined with the dRPA, CCD0+DFT can account for all three-types of electron correlation that are necessary to accurately describe molecular systems. Lastly, applications of CCD0+DFT to actinide chemistry are considered in this work. The accuracy of CCD0+DFT for predicting equilibrium geometries and vibrational frequencies of actinide molecules and ions is assessed and compared to that of well-established quantum chemical methods. For this purpose, the $f^0$ actinyl series (UO$_2^{2+}$, NpO$_ 2^{3+}$, PuO$_2^{4+}$), the isoelectronic NUN, and Thorium (ThO, ThO$^{2+}$) and Nobelium (NoO, NoO$_2$) oxides are studied. It is shown that the CCD0+DFT description of these species agrees with available experimental data and is comparable with the results given by the highest-level calculations that are possible for such heavy compounds while being, at least, an order of magnitude lower in computational cost.

•Jun 2, 2016•0 citations

Progress and Challenges with Luttinger-Ward Approaches for Going Beyond DFT

Sohrab Ismail‐Beigi

The well-known and well-used Density Functional Theory (DFT) is a variational theory for the ground-state. There are no guarantees that it delivers good results for excited state properties such as quasiparticle energies or wave function. All that is guaranteed is that the total energy is exact, the chemical potential is correct, and that the eective electronic states (Kohn-Sham states) generate the right electron density at the variational minimum. Luttinger-Ward approaches to electronic structure are attractive as beyond-DFT schemes since, in principle, they oer a variational functional of the one-electron Green’s function that yields both the correct total energy and all one-particle properties at the variational extremum. However, compared to DFT, these methods face a number of additional challenges beyond the familiar problem of choosing an exchange-correlation functional: (a) they have a much greater computational cost compared to DFT, (b) one must choose some set of trial Green’s functions, and (c) one must locate an extremum (not necessarily a minimum). This talk aims both to be pedagogical and to provide a summary of our most recent work in this area. We focus mainly on the random-phase approximation (RPA) for the correlation functional which yields the GW self-energy for the Green’s function. We will describe ecient approaches for computing the RPA correlation energy; how various types of approximations to the correlation energy create a ladder of approximate self-energy operators and what type of physics is included in these approximations (exchange, screening, Hubbard U, etc.); and how the extremization is in fact highly problematic. We will end with some ideas for making practical progress with the extremization and their relation to the successful Quasiparticle Self-consistent GW (QSGW) scheme [1].

•Jan 1, 2012•0 citations

Random phase approximation vs exact shell-model correlation energies

Ionel Stetcu, Calvin W. Johnson

The random phase approximation (RPA) builds in correlations left out by mean-field theory. In full $0\ensuremath{\Elzxh}\ensuremath{\omega}$ shell-model spaces we calculate the Hartree-Fock $(\mathrm{HF})+\mathrm{RPA}$ binding energy, and compare it to exact diagonalization. We find that often, but not always, the $\mathrm{HF}+\mathrm{RPA}$ gives a good approximation to the ``exact'' ground state energy. In those cases where the RPA is less satisfactory, however, there is no obvious correlation with properties of the HF state, such as deformation or overlap with the exact ground state wave function. This weakens the reliability of the RPA for computing binding energies.

arXiv:nucl-th/0205029•Physical Review C•Sep 3, 2002•37 citations

Band-gap energy in the random-phase approximation to density-functional theory

Yann‐Michel Niquet, Xavier Gonze

We calculate the interacting bandgap energy of a solid within the random-phase approximation (RPA) to density functional theory (DFT). The interacting bandgap energy is defined as ${E}_{g}={E}^{\mathrm{RPA}}(N+1)+{E}^{\mathrm{RPA}}(N\ensuremath{-}1)\ensuremath{-}2{E}^{\mathrm{RPA}}(N)$, where ${E}^{\mathrm{RPA}}(N)$ is the total DFT-RPA energy of the $N$-electron system. We compare the interacting bandgap energy with the Kohn-Sham bandgap energy, which is the difference between the conduction and valence band edges in the Kohn-Sham band structure. We show that they differ by an unrenormalized ``${G}_{0}{W}_{0}$'' self-energy correction (i.e., a $GW$ self-energy correction computed using Kohn-Sham orbitals and energies as input). This provides a well-defined and meaningful interpretation to ${G}_{0}{W}_{0}$ quasiparticle bandgap calculations, but questions the physics behind the renormalization factors in the expression of the bandgap energy. We also separate the kinetic from the Coulomb contributions to the DFT-RPA bandgap energy, and discuss the related problem of the derivative discontinuity in the DFT-RPA functional. Last we discuss the applicability of our results to other functionals based on many-body perturbation theory.

Physical Review B•Dec 16, 2004•55 citations

Linear-response time-dependent density-functional theory with pairing fields

Degao Peng, Helen van Aggelen, Yang Yang +1 more

Recent development in particle-particle random phase approximation (pp-RPA) broadens the perspective on ground state correlation energies [H. van Aggelen, Y. Yang, and W. Yang, Phys. Rev. A 88, 030501 (2013), Y. Yang, H. van Aggelen, S. N. Steinmann, D. Peng, and W. Yang, J. Chem. Phys. 139, 174110 (2013); D. Peng, S. N. Steinmann, H. van Aggelen, and W. Yang, J. Chem. Phys. 139, 104112 (2013)] and N ± 2 excitation energies [Y. Yang, H. van Aggelen, and W. Yang, J. Chem. Phys. 139, 224105 (2013)]. So far Hartree-Fock and approximated density-functional orbitals have been utilized to evaluate the pp-RPA equation. In this paper, to further explore the fundamentals and the potential use of pairing matrix dependent functionals, we present the linear-response time-dependent density-functional theory with pairing fields with both adiabatic and frequency-dependent kernels. This theory is related to the density-functional theory and time-dependent density-functional theory for superconductors, but is applied to normal non-superconducting systems for our purpose. Due to the lack of the proof of the one-to-one mapping between the pairing matrix and the pairing field for time-dependent systems, the linear-response theory is established based on the representability assumption of the pairing matrix. The linear response theory justifies the use of approximated density-functionals in the pp-RPA equation. This work sets the fundamentals for future density-functional development to enhance the description of ground state correlation energies and N ± 2 excitation energies.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Mar 14, 2014•39 citations
The recent realization that the ground-state correlation energy of the random phase approximation (RPA) is intimately connected to an approximate coupled cluster doubles (CCD) model [1], opens interesting avenues for mixing RPA with DFT [2]. I will describe some of the recent work done in our research group on RPA, including applications to van der waals and noncovalent interactions [3]. Time permitting, I will discuss a new mean-field model for describing static (strong) correlations [4-5].
Abstract Random phase approximation (RPA) electron correlation methods have gained in popularity in the recent years. A number of RPA correlation energy variants emerged in the Kohn–Sham DFT framework and in the theory of strongly orthogonal geminals. Foundations of most RPA approaches trace back to an exact expression for two‐electron reduced density matrix written in terms of one‐electron density matrix and dynamic one‐electron response functions, originally presented in the seminal paper of McLachlan and Ball (Rev. Mod. Phys. 1964, 36, 844). The aim of this article is to give a pedagogical introduction to possible approaches for describing electron correlation energy based on the McLachlan and Ball formula. The focus of the presentation is to formulate electron‐interaction energy expressions as functions of reduced density matrices. On one hand, it provides a common umbrella for RPA approximations proposed for uncorrelated (Hartree–Fock or Kohn–Sham) as well as partially correlated (strongly orthogonal geminals) references. On the other hand, such presentation may stimulate new developments in density matrix functional theory.
Perhaps the most important approximations to the electronic structure problem in quantum chemistry are those based on coupled cluster and density functional theories. Coupled cluster theory has been called the ``gold standard'' of quantum chemistry due to the high accuracy that it achieves for weakly correlated systems. Kohn--Sham density functionals based on semilocal approximations are, without a doubt, the most widely used methods in chemistry and material science because of their high accuracy/cost ratio. The root of the success of coupled cluster and density functionals is their ability to efficiently describe the dynamic part of the electron correlation. However, both traditional coupled cluster and density functional approximations may fail catastrophically when substantial static correlation is present. This severely limits the applicability of these methods to a plethora of important chemical and physical problems such as, e.g., the description of bond breaking, transition states, transition metal-, lanthanide- and actinide-containing compounds, and superconductivity. In an attempt to tackle this problem, nonstandard (single-reference) coupled cluster-based techniques that aim to describe static correlation have been recently developed: pair coupled cluster doubles (pCCD) and singlet-paired coupled cluster doubles (CCD0). The ability to describe static correlation in pCCD and CCD0 comes, however, at the expense of important amounts of dynamic correlation so that the high accuracy of standard coupled cluster becomes unattainable. Thus, the reliable and efficient description of static and dynamic correlation in a simultaneous manner remains an open problem for quantum chemistry and many-body theory in general. In this thesis, different ways to combine pCCD and CCD0 with density functionals in order to describe static and dynamic correlation simultaneously (and efficiently) are explored. The combination of wavefunction and density functional methods has a long history in quantum chemistry (practical implementations have appeared in the literature since the 1970s). However, this kind of techniques have not achieved widespread use due to problems such as double counting of correlation and the symmetry dilemma---the fact that wavefunction methods respect the symmetries of Hamiltonian, while modern functionals are designed to work with broken symmetry densities. Here, particular mathematical features of pCCD and CCD0 are exploited to avoid these problems in an efficient manner. The two resulting families of approximations, denoted as pCCD+DFT and CCD0+DFT, are shown to be able to describe static and dynamic correlation in standard benchmark calculations. Furthermore, it is also shown that CCD0+DFT lends itself to combination with correlation from the direct random phase approximation (dRPA). Inclusion of dRPA in the long-range via the technique of range-separation allows for the description of dispersion correlation, the remaining part of the correlation. Thus, when combined with the dRPA, CCD0+DFT can account for all three-types of electron correlation that are necessary to accurately describe molecular systems. Lastly, applications of CCD0+DFT to actinide chemistry are considered in this work. The accuracy of CCD0+DFT for predicting equilibrium geometries and vibrational frequencies of actinide molecules and ions is assessed and compared to that of well-established quantum chemical methods. For this purpose, the f0f^0f0 actinyl series (UO22+_2^{2+}22+​, NpO23+_ 2^{3+}23+​, PuO24+_2^{4+}24+​), the isoelectronic NUN, and Thorium (ThO, ThO2+^{2+}2+) and Nobelium (NoO, NoO2_22​) oxides are studied. It is shown that the CCD0+DFT description of these species agrees with available experimental data and is comparable with the results given by the highest-level calculations that are possible for such heavy compounds while being, at least, an order of magnitude lower in computational cost.
The well-known and well-used Density Functional Theory (DFT) is a variational theory for the ground-state. There are no guarantees that it delivers good results for excited state properties such as quasiparticle energies or wave function. All that is guaranteed is that the total energy is exact, the chemical potential is correct, and that the eective electronic states (Kohn-Sham states) generate the right electron density at the variational minimum. Luttinger-Ward approaches to electronic structure are attractive as beyond-DFT schemes since, in principle, they oer a variational functional of the one-electron Green’s function that yields both the correct total energy and all one-particle properties at the variational extremum. However, compared to DFT, these methods face a number of additional challenges beyond the familiar problem of choosing an exchange-correlation functional: (a) they have a much greater computational cost compared to DFT, (b) one must choose some set of trial Green’s functions, and (c) one must locate an extremum (not necessarily a minimum). This talk aims both to be pedagogical and to provide a summary of our most recent work in this area. We focus mainly on the random-phase approximation (RPA) for the correlation functional which yields the GW self-energy for the Green’s function. We will describe ecient approaches for computing the RPA correlation energy; how various types of approximations to the correlation energy create a ladder of approximate self-energy operators and what type of physics is included in these approximations (exchange, screening, Hubbard U, etc.); and how the extremization is in fact highly problematic. We will end with some ideas for making practical progress with the extremization and their relation to the successful Quasiparticle Self-consistent GW (QSGW) scheme [1].
The random phase approximation (RPA) builds in correlations left out by mean-field theory. In full $0\ensuremath{\Elzxh}\ensuremath{\omega}$ shell-model spaces we calculate the Hartree-Fock (HF)+RPA(\mathrm{HF})+\mathrm{RPA}(HF)+RPA binding energy, and compare it to exact diagonalization. We find that often, but not always, the HF+RPA\mathrm{HF}+\mathrm{RPA}HF+RPA gives a good approximation to the ``exact'' ground state energy. In those cases where the RPA is less satisfactory, however, there is no obvious correlation with properties of the HF state, such as deformation or overlap with the exact ground state wave function. This weakens the reliability of the RPA for computing binding energies.
We calculate the interacting bandgap energy of a solid within the random-phase approximation (RPA) to density functional theory (DFT). The interacting bandgap energy is defined as ${E}_{g}={E}^{\mathrm{RPA}}(N+1)+{E}^{\mathrm{RPA}}(N\ensuremath{-}1)\ensuremath{-}2{E}^{\mathrm{RPA}}(N)$, where ERPA(N){E}^{\mathrm{RPA}}(N)ERPA(N) is the total DFT-RPA energy of the NNN-electron system. We compare the interacting bandgap energy with the Kohn-Sham bandgap energy, which is the difference between the conduction and valence band edges in the Kohn-Sham band structure. We show that they differ by an unrenormalized ``G0W0{G}_{0}{W}_{0}G0​W0​'' self-energy correction (i.e., a GWGWGW self-energy correction computed using Kohn-Sham orbitals and energies as input). This provides a well-defined and meaningful interpretation to G0W0{G}_{0}{W}_{0}G0​W0​ quasiparticle bandgap calculations, but questions the physics behind the renormalization factors in the expression of the bandgap energy. We also separate the kinetic from the Coulomb contributions to the DFT-RPA bandgap energy, and discuss the related problem of the derivative discontinuity in the DFT-RPA functional. Last we discuss the applicability of our results to other functionals based on many-body perturbation theory.
Recent development in particle-particle random phase approximation (pp-RPA) broadens the perspective on ground state correlation energies [H. van Aggelen, Y. Yang, and W. Yang, Phys. Rev. A 88, 030501 (2013), Y. Yang, H. van Aggelen, S. N. Steinmann, D. Peng, and W. Yang, J. Chem. Phys. 139, 174110 (2013); D. Peng, S. N. Steinmann, H. van Aggelen, and W. Yang, J. Chem. Phys. 139, 104112 (2013)] and N ± 2 excitation energies [Y. Yang, H. van Aggelen, and W. Yang, J. Chem. Phys. 139, 224105 (2013)]. So far Hartree-Fock and approximated density-functional orbitals have been utilized to evaluate the pp-RPA equation. In this paper, to further explore the fundamentals and the potential use of pairing matrix dependent functionals, we present the linear-response time-dependent density-functional theory with pairing fields with both adiabatic and frequency-dependent kernels. This theory is related to the density-functional theory and time-dependent density-functional theory for superconductors, but is applied to normal non-superconducting systems for our purpose. Due to the lack of the proof of the one-to-one mapping between the pairing matrix and the pairing field for time-dependent systems, the linear-response theory is established based on the representability assumption of the pairing matrix. The linear response theory justifies the use of approximated density-functionals in the pp-RPA equation. This work sets the fundamentals for future density-functional development to enhance the description of ground state correlation energies and N ± 2 excitation energies.