Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Compendium of Quantum Physics

Correlations in Quantum Mechanics

Richard Healey

Published Jan 1, 2009• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-540-70626-7_38

Related papers

The local explanation of EPR correlations in the modified Quantum Mechanics

Jiří Souček

In this note we shall give the simple formulation of the local explanation of EPR correlations [1] based on [2]. We also show that Bell inequalities cannot be derived in the modified Quantum Mechanics (QM).

•Jul 1, 2015•0 citations

Correlations without joint distributions in quantum mechanics

Nancy Delaney Cartwright

Foundations of Physics•Mar 1, 1974•14 citations

Two-Time Correlation Functions : Bohm Theory and Conventional Quantum Mechanics

L. Feligioni, Y. Srivastava, Orlando Panella +1 more

An investigation of two-time correlation functions is reported within the framework of (i) the Bohm theory of stochastic quantum mechanics and (ii) conventional Heisenberg-Schroedinger quantum mechanics. The spectral functions associated with the two-time electric dipole correlation functions are worked out in detail for the case of the hydrogen atom. While the single time averages are identical for Bohm stochastic quantum mechanics and the conventional Heisenberg-Schroedinger quantum mechanics, differences arise in the two approaches for multiple time correlation functions.

•Feb 7, 2002•1 citation

Correlation of particle momenta in quantum-mechanical systems

T. K. Rebane

PAN•May 1, 1998•0 citations

Measuring correlations in quantum systems

Daniel Manzano

•Mar 31, 2019•0 citations

On a Gap in the Derivation of the Bell Nonlocality

Jiří Souček

Abstract. In this note we shall show that the proof of the nonlocality of Quantum Mechanics given in [1] contains a gap. We also show that Bell inequalities cannot be derived in the modified QM. In the paper [1] there is a proof of the nonlocality of Quantum Mechanics (QM). In the proof of this statement the main step is the following implication: “from EPR correlations to the predetermination”. This means the following: “A deterministic hidden variable theory was one’s only hope, if one wanted to explain the predicted quantum correlations in a local way. ” ([1]. Page 2) – i.e. the nonlocality or the pre-determination. “The important thing was instead that the only way to explain the perfect correlations locally is to attribute outcome-determining properties to the individual particles. These properties, evidently, would vary randomly from one particle pair to the next, but would be fixed (in an appropriately correlated way) once and for all at the source for a given particle pair. ” ([1], page 2). This may be called the pre-determination. “ … such deterministic hidden variables are the only way to account locally for the

•Aug 1, 2015•0 citations
An investigation of two-time correlation functions is reported within the framework of (i) the Bohm theory of stochastic quantum mechanics and (ii) conventional Heisenberg-Schroedinger quantum mechanics. The spectral functions associated with the two-time electric dipole correlation functions are worked out in detail for the case of the hydrogen atom. While the single time averages are identical for Bohm stochastic quantum mechanics and the conventional Heisenberg-Schroedinger quantum mechanics, differences arise in the two approaches for multiple time correlation functions.
Abstract. In this note we shall show that the proof of the nonlocality of Quantum Mechanics given in [1] contains a gap. We also show that Bell inequalities cannot be derived in the modified QM. In the paper [1] there is a proof of the nonlocality of Quantum Mechanics (QM). In the proof of this statement the main step is the following implication: “from EPR correlations to the predetermination”. This means the following: “A deterministic hidden variable theory was one’s only hope, if one wanted to explain the predicted quantum correlations in a local way. ” ([1]. Page 2) – i.e. the nonlocality or the pre-determination. “The important thing was instead that the only way to explain the perfect correlations locally is to attribute outcome-determining properties to the individual particles. These properties, evidently, would vary randomly from one particle pair to the next, but would be fixed (in an appropriately correlated way) once and for all at the source for a given particle pair. ” ([1], page 2). This may be called the pre-determination. “ … such deterministic hidden variables are the only way to account locally for the