Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Experimental evidence of antiphase population dynamics in lasers (4 pages)

Óscar G. Calderón, E. Cabrera

Published Jan 1, 2005• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Modeling of photon density dynamics in random lasers (5 pages)

Mikhail A. Noginov

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 2004•0 citations

Experimental evidence of phase-dependent coherent population trapping

Wolfgang Maichen, Rainer Gaggl, Eugeny Korsunsky +1 more

•Jan 1, 1996•0 citations

Experimental Demonstration of Laser Oscillation Without Population Inversion

Alexander S. Zibrov, Mikhail D. Lukin, Dmitri E. Nikonov +4 more

Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference•May 22, 1995•0 citations

Experimental evidence of antiphase population dynamics in lasers

E. Cabrera, Óscar G. Calderón, J. M. Guerra

We report a direct experimental observation of antiphase oscillations in population dynamics in lasers. We show that these population oscillations are intrinsically related to the well-known antiphase polarization dynamics, i.e., the antiphase oscillations of two orthogonal polarization laser field states. We have used a class $B$ Nd:YAG (yttrium aluminum garnet) laser.

Physical Review A•Oct 27, 2005•11 citations

Possible population inversion in the ground-state sublevels in a laser

E. S. Kovalenko, А. А. Тихомиров

Russian Physics Journal•Jan 1, 1969•0 citations

In-phase and antiphase dynamics of Rydberg atoms with distinguishable resonances

Chu-Hui Fan, Han-Xiao Zhang, Jin-Hui Wu

We study the correlated evolutions of two Rydberg atoms, interacting via a van der Waals (vdW) potential ${V}_{6}$ and driven by a laser field of detunings ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}}_{1}$ and ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}}_{2}$. The two atoms may exhibit the in-phase dynamics with identical Rydberg populations or the antiphase dynamics with complementary Rydberg populations, depending on their initial states. For a moderate vdW potential far from the blockade regime, the in-phase or antiphase dynamics can be attained along two intersecting lines in the parameter space of ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}}_{1}$ and ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}}_{2}$ with an exact or approximate figure of merit, respectively. Note, in particular, that the exact in-phase dynamics is trivial because it requires identical detunings while the approximate in-phase, exact antiphase, and approximate antiphase dynamics are nontrivial because they require distinct detunings. The specific requirements on ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}}_{1}$ and ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}}_{2}$ for both in-phase and antiphase dynamics can be understood by considering the balanced transitions from two initially populated states to two initially empty states in the double-atom state basis.

Physical Review A•Mar 6, 2019•7 citations
We report a direct experimental observation of antiphase oscillations in population dynamics in lasers. We show that these population oscillations are intrinsically related to the well-known antiphase polarization dynamics, i.e., the antiphase oscillations of two orthogonal polarization laser field states. We have used a class BBB Nd:YAG (yttrium aluminum garnet) laser.
We study the correlated evolutions of two Rydberg atoms, interacting via a van der Waals (vdW) potential V6{V}_{6}V6​ and driven by a laser field of detunings ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}}_{1}$ and ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}}_{2}$. The two atoms may exhibit the in-phase dynamics with identical Rydberg populations or the antiphase dynamics with complementary Rydberg populations, depending on their initial states. For a moderate vdW potential far from the blockade regime, the in-phase or antiphase dynamics can be attained along two intersecting lines in the parameter space of ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}}_{1}$ and ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}}_{2}$ with an exact or approximate figure of merit, respectively. Note, in particular, that the exact in-phase dynamics is trivial because it requires identical detunings while the approximate in-phase, exact antiphase, and approximate antiphase dynamics are nontrivial because they require distinct detunings. The specific requirements on ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}}_{1}$ and ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}}_{2}$ for both in-phase and antiphase dynamics can be understood by considering the balanced transitions from two initially populated states to two initially empty states in the double-atom state basis.