Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Bell's inequality, random sequence, and quantum key distribution (3 pages)

Won-Young Hwang

Published Jan 1, 2005• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Information-theoretic temporal Bell inequality and quantum computation (5 pages)

Fumiaki Morikoshi

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 2006•3 citations

Quantum key distribution by comparing Bell states

Gan Gao

Optics Communications•Dec 5, 2007•45 citations

Bell’s inequality, random sequence, and quantum key distribution

Won-Young Hwang

The Ekert 1991 quantum key distribution (QKD) protocol appears to be secure regardless of whatever devices legitimate users adopt for the protocol, as long as the devices give a result that violates Bell's inequality. However, this is not the case if they ignore nondetection events because Eve can make use of the detection loophole, as Larrson showed [Quantum Inf. Comput. 2, 434 (2002)]. We show that even when legitimate users take into account nondetection events Eve can successfully eavesdrop if the QKD system has been appropriately designed by the manufacturer. A loophole utilized here is that of ``free choice'' (or ``real randomness''). Local QKD devices with a pseudorandom sequence generator installed in them can apparently violate Bell's inequality.

arXiv:quant-ph/0501162•Physical Review A•May 26, 2005•6 citations

From Bell’s Theorem to Quantum Key Distribution: Mapping the Fundamental Assumptions

Mate Jagnjić, Josip Vuković, Dario Bojanjac

International Symposium ELMAR (ELMAR)•Sep 1, 2026•0 citations

From Bell’s Theorem to Secure Quantum Key Distribution

Antonio Acín, Nicolas Gisin, Lluís Masanes

The first step in any quantum key distribution (QKD) protocol consists of sequences of measurements that produce correlated classical data. We show that these correlation data must violate some Bell inequality in order to contain distillable secrecy, if not they could be produced by quantum measurements performed on a separable state of larger dimension. We introduce a new QKD protocol and prove its security against any individual attack by an adversary only limited by the no-signaling condition.

arXiv:quant-ph/0510094•Physical Review Letters•Sep 20, 2006•709 citations

Quantum key distribution with single-particle and Bell state

Huawang Qin, Hao Xu, K.S. Tang

Optical and Quantum Electronics•Jul 1, 2020•4 citations
The Ekert 1991 quantum key distribution (QKD) protocol appears to be secure regardless of whatever devices legitimate users adopt for the protocol, as long as the devices give a result that violates Bell's inequality. However, this is not the case if they ignore nondetection events because Eve can make use of the detection loophole, as Larrson showed [Quantum Inf. Comput. 2, 434 (2002)]. We show that even when legitimate users take into account nondetection events Eve can successfully eavesdrop if the QKD system has been appropriately designed by the manufacturer. A loophole utilized here is that of ``free choice'' (or ``real randomness''). Local QKD devices with a pseudorandom sequence generator installed in them can apparently violate Bell's inequality.
The first step in any quantum key distribution (QKD) protocol consists of sequences of measurements that produce correlated classical data. We show that these correlation data must violate some Bell inequality in order to contain distillable secrecy, if not they could be produced by quantum measurements performed on a separable state of larger dimension. We introduce a new QKD protocol and prove its security against any individual attack by an adversary only limited by the no-signaling condition.