Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Discrete Time Realizations of Quantum Mechanics and their Possible Experimental Tests

C. Wolf

Published Jan 1, 1994• 2 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4615-2560-8_55

Related papers

Experimental Characterization of a Discrete Gaussian-modulated Quantum Key Distribution System

Christian de los Ríos

Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) utilizes the laws of quantum mechanics to enable a verifiably secure distribution of cryptographic key material between distant parties. When properly implemented alongside a one-time pad encryption scheme, QKD can provide unconditional security which is not possible with modern cryptographic systems. One of the most common QKD protocols, the Gaussian-modulated coherent state (GMCS) protocol can never be truly realized due to the stringent requirements of a true Gaussian modulation. This thesis outlines a method for testing a discrete Gaussian-modulated (DGM) QKD protocol which accounts for the discrete nature of its practical implementation. A proof-of-principle experiment for measuring its performance is presented, and a field programmable gate array (FPGA) controlled phase compensation system is designed for practical implementations.

•Jan 1, 2021•1 citation

Towards Time-Discrete Quantum Mechanics

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2002•0 citations

Quantum mechanics in a discrete space-time

Pavel Šťovíček, J. Tolar

Reports on Mathematical Physics•Oct 1, 1984•91 citations

Scheme for measuring experimentally the velocity of pilot waves and the discreteness of time

Guang Ping He, Richard L. Amoroso, Peter Rowlands +1 more

We consider the following two questions. Suppose that a quantum system suffers a change of the boundary condition or the potential at a given space location. Then (1) when will the wavefunction shows a response to this change at another location? And (2) how does the wavefunction changes?The answer to question (1) could reveal how a quantum system gets information on the boundary condition or the potential. Here we show that if the response takes place immediately, then it can allow superluminal signal transfer. Else if the response propagates in space with a finite velocity, then it could give a simple explanation why our world shows classicality on the macroscopic scale. Furthermore, determining the exact value of this velocity can either clarify the doubts on static experiments for testing Bell’s inequality, or support the pilot‐wave interpretation of quantum mechanics. We propose a feasible experimental scheme for measuring this velocity, which can be implemented with state‐of‐art technology, e.g., single‐electron biprism interferometry.Question (2) is studied with a square‐well potential model, and we find a paradox between the impossibility of superluminal signal transfer and the normalization condition of wavefunctions. To solve the paradox, we predict that when a change of the potential occurs at a given space location, the system will show no response to this change at all, until after a certain time interval. Otherwise either special relativity or quantum mechanics will be violated. As a consequence, no physical process can actually happen within Planck time. Therefore it gives a simple proof that time is discrete, with Planck time being the smallest unit. Combining with the answer to question (1), systems with a larger size and a slower velocity could have a larger unit of time, making it possible to test the discreteness of time experimentally. Our result also sets a limit on the speed of computers, and gives instruction to the search of quantum gravity theories.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2010•0 citations

POPPER'S EXPERIMENT, COPENHAGEN INTERPRETATION AND NONLOCALITY

Tabish Qureshi

A thought experiment, proposed by Karl Popper, which has been experimentally realized recently, is critically examined. A basic flaw in Popper's argument which has also been prevailing in subsequent debates, is pointed out. It is shown that Popper's experiment can be understood easily within the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. An alternate experiment, based on discrete variables, is proposed, which constitutes Popper's test in a clearer way. It refutes the argument of absence of nonlocality in quantum mechanics.

arXiv:quant-ph/0301123•International Journal of Quantum Information•Aug 30, 2004•6 citations

Quantum mechanics in a discrete space-time

Lester C. Welch

Il Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. B/Il Nuovo cimento B•Feb 1, 1976•14 citations
Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) utilizes the laws of quantum mechanics to enable a verifiably secure distribution of cryptographic key material between distant parties. When properly implemented alongside a one-time pad encryption scheme, QKD can provide unconditional security which is not possible with modern cryptographic systems. One of the most common QKD protocols, the Gaussian-modulated coherent state (GMCS) protocol can never be truly realized due to the stringent requirements of a true Gaussian modulation. This thesis outlines a method for testing a discrete Gaussian-modulated (DGM) QKD protocol which accounts for the discrete nature of its practical implementation. A proof-of-principle experiment for measuring its performance is presented, and a field programmable gate array (FPGA) controlled phase compensation system is designed for practical implementations.
We consider the following two questions. Suppose that a quantum system suffers a change of the boundary condition or the potential at a given space location. Then (1) when will the wavefunction shows a response to this change at another location? And (2) how does the wavefunction changes?The answer to question (1) could reveal how a quantum system gets information on the boundary condition or the potential. Here we show that if the response takes place immediately, then it can allow superluminal signal transfer. Else if the response propagates in space with a finite velocity, then it could give a simple explanation why our world shows classicality on the macroscopic scale. Furthermore, determining the exact value of this velocity can either clarify the doubts on static experiments for testing Bell’s inequality, or support the pilot‐wave interpretation of quantum mechanics. We propose a feasible experimental scheme for measuring this velocity, which can be implemented with state‐of‐art technology, e.g., single‐electron biprism interferometry.Question (2) is studied with a square‐well potential model, and we find a paradox between the impossibility of superluminal signal transfer and the normalization condition of wavefunctions. To solve the paradox, we predict that when a change of the potential occurs at a given space location, the system will show no response to this change at all, until after a certain time interval. Otherwise either special relativity or quantum mechanics will be violated. As a consequence, no physical process can actually happen within Planck time. Therefore it gives a simple proof that time is discrete, with Planck time being the smallest unit. Combining with the answer to question (1), systems with a larger size and a slower velocity could have a larger unit of time, making it possible to test the discreteness of time experimentally. Our result also sets a limit on the speed of computers, and gives instruction to the search of quantum gravity theories.
A thought experiment, proposed by Karl Popper, which has been experimentally realized recently, is critically examined. A basic flaw in Popper's argument which has also been prevailing in subsequent debates, is pointed out. It is shown that Popper's experiment can be understood easily within the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. An alternate experiment, based on discrete variables, is proposed, which constitutes Popper's test in a clearer way. It refutes the argument of absence of nonlocality in quantum mechanics.