Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Locality, Localization, and the Particle Concept: Topics in the Foundations of Quantum Field Theory

Hans Halvorson

Published Apr 1, 2001• 7 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

... article, nor of the number of particles in any particular region of space. Nonetheless, the absence of localizable particles in RQFT does not threaten the integrity of our commonsense concept of a localized object. Indeed, RQFT itself predicts that descriptions in terms of localized objects can be quite accurate on the macroscopic level. The third part of the dissertation examines the so-called observer-dependence of the particle concept in RQFT --- that is, whether there are any particles present must be relativized to an observer's state of motion. Now, it is not uncommon for modern physical theories to subsume observer-dependent descriptions under a more general observer-independent description of some underlying state of affairs. However, I show that the conflicting accounts concerning the particle content of the field cannot be reconciled in this way. In fact, I argue that these conflicting accounts should be thought of as "complementary" in the same sense that position and mome

Related papers

Locality in non-relativistic and relativistic quantum mechanics

D. R. E. Timpson

This thesis investigates the description of localised states and observables in quantum mechanics.Motivated by the fact that actual experimental apparatus is of only finite size, a method of localising any observable ("selfadjoint operator on Hilbert space) is introduced, which is applicable to both bounded and unbounded operators.This method makes use of objects called localising isometries, which also prove useful in modifying the evolution of non-relativistic particles, so that they remain well localised at all times: this modification does not jeopardise the well tested predictions of standard quantum mechanics.It is mathematically more convenient when describing systems of well separated identical particles.Pairs of correlated particles, such as those considered in EPR-type thought experiments, undergo chronological disordering at large times, and the analysis of this phenomenon is used to argue physically in favour of asymptotic algebras, which do not contain two-particle observables at infinite times.The second part of the thesis investigates the description of the position of a spinless relativistic particle.Existing Lorentz covariant currents are non-local, i.e. they describe particles which are not strictly localised in a bounded region of space, and these currents are modified so as to describe strictly localised particles, which evolve causally.vi

•Jan 1, 1987•0 citations

The concept of particle in Quantum Field theory

Eliano Pessa

Despite its name, Quantum Field Theory (QFT) has been built to describe interactions between localizable particles. For this reason the actual formalism of QFT is partly based on a suitable generalization of the one already used for systems of point particles. This circumstance gives rise to a number of conceptual problems, stemming essentially from the fact that the existence within QFT of non-equivalent representations implies the existence of field theories allowing, within the same theory, different, inequivalent, descriptions of particles. This led some authors to claim that in QFT the concept itself of particle should be abandoned. In this paper we will shortly discuss the validity of this claim, as well as the possibilities, so far existing, of building alternative versions of QFT, not designed in advance to allow some kind of particle representation. We will also spend some words about the generalizations of the concept itself of particle which could grant for a better cohabitation of particles and fields within a wider formulation of QFT. The latter is indispensable if we want to extend the range of application of QFT from particle physics or simple condensed matter physics to other domains of scientific research.

arXiv:0907.0178•Jul 1, 2009•18 citations

A groupoidal approach to quantum reference frames

Samuel Fedida, Alberto Ibort, Arnau Mas-Dorca

We develop the kinematical and operator-algebraic foundations of a groupoid-based relational quantum field theory (RQFT) on curved spacetimes. Indeed, the usual group-based quantum reference frame (QRF) formalism is not directly suited to generic curved Lorentzian backgrounds as global symmetry groups are typically absent or too small. We formulate a notion of QRF for a continuous groupoid. This yields a groupoid relativization map and relational observables. We show that a localization limit recovers the ordinary non-relational description. We construct canonical sharp groupoid QRFs, which form the groupoidal counterpart of the ideal group QRFs based on $L^2(G)$. We further prove that the groupoid QRF construction reduces to the standard operational QRF formalism for locally compact groups. The action groupoid QRFs are torsor QRFs only for specific classes of fields of positive operator-valued measures (POVMs), and the torsor relativization map only applies to constant operator fields of system observables. We review the foundations of RQFT in Minkowski spacetime. We prove new results that further link RQFT to Wightman QFT. We show that covariant POVMs are $μ$-continuous with respect to quasi-invariant $σ$-finite positive Borel measures $μ$. Thus, relational quantum fields can be understood as the smearing of pointwise-defined kernels with respect to the QRF's statistics. We develop RQFT in curved spacetime, where we argue that the correct replacement for the Poincaré group is the Poincaré groupoid of the spacetime. We also indicate how the framework extends further to internal gauge symmetry and relational gauge-covariant quantum field theory via Atiyah groupoids, providing a first step towards formulating a relational quantum Yang-Mills field theory.

quant-pharXiv:2608.14133•Aug 17, 2026•0 citations

Are Rindler Quanta Real? Inequivalent particle concepts in quantum field theory

Rob Clifton, Hans Halvorson

Philosophical reflection on quantum field theory has tended to focus on how it revises our conception of what a particle is. However, there has been relatively little discussion of the threat to the "reality" of particles posed by the possibility of inequivalent quantizations of a classical field theory, i.e., inequivalent representations of the algebra of observables of the field in terms of operators on a Hilbert space. The threat is that each representation embodies its own distinctive conception of what a particle is, and how a "particle" will respond to a suitably operated detector. Our main goal is to clarify the subtle relationship between inequivalent representations of a field theory and their associated particle concepts. We also have a particular interest in the Minkowski versus Rindler quantizations of a free Boson field, because they respectively entail two radically different descriptions of the particle content of the field in the very same region of spacetime. We shall defend the idea that these representations provide complementary descriptions of the same state of the field against the claim that they embody completely incommensurable theories of the field.

arXiv:quant-ph/0008030•Aug 5, 2000•0 citations

Are Rindler Quanta Real? Inequivalent Particle Concepts in Quantum Field Theory

Rob Clifton, Hans Halvorson

Philosophical reflection on quantum field theory has tended to focus on how it revises our conception of what a particle is. However, there has been relatively little discussion of the threat to the ‘reality’ of particles posed by the possibility of inequivalent quantizations of a classical field theory, i.e. inequivalent representations of the algebra of observables of the field in terms of operators on a Hilbert space. The threat is that each representation embodies its own distinctive conception of what a particle is, and how a ‘particle’ will respond to a suitably operated detector. Our main goal is to clarify the subtle relationship between inequivalent representations of a field theory and their associated particle concepts. We also have a particular interest in the Minkowski versus Rindler quantizations of a free Boson field, because they respectively entail two radically different descriptions of the particle content of the field in the very same region of spacetime. We shall defend the idea that these representations provide complementary descriptions of the same state of the field against the claim that they embody completely incommensurable theories of the field.

The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science•Sep 1, 2001•95 citations

The Particle-Operator and Particle States in Quantum Field Theory

Minoru Omote, S. Kamefuchi

By using the method of particle-operators, proposed previously, we examine the problem of particle states (spatially localized) with emphasis upon the relativistic case. A physical interpretation is also given of the results which seem to contradict locality, covariance and causality.

CRC Press eBooks•Nov 30, 2003•0 citations
... article, nor of the number of particles in any particular region of space. Nonetheless, the absence of localizable particles in RQFT does not threaten the integrity of our commonsense concept of a localized object. Indeed, RQFT itself predicts that descriptions in terms of localized objects can be quite accurate on the macroscopic level. The third part of the dissertation examines the so-called observer-dependence of the particle concept in RQFT --- that is, whether there are any particles present must be relativized to an observer's state of motion. Now, it is not uncommon for modern physical theories to subsume observer-dependent descriptions under a more general observer-independent description of some underlying state of affairs. However, I show that the conflicting accounts concerning the particle content of the field cannot be reconciled in this way. In fact, I argue that these conflicting accounts should be thought of as "complementary" in the same sense that position and mome
This thesis investigates the description of localised states and observables in quantum mechanics.Motivated by the fact that actual experimental apparatus is of only finite size, a method of localising any observable ("selfadjoint operator on Hilbert space) is introduced, which is applicable to both bounded and unbounded operators.This method makes use of objects called localising isometries, which also prove useful in modifying the evolution of non-relativistic particles, so that they remain well localised at all times: this modification does not jeopardise the well tested predictions of standard quantum mechanics.It is mathematically more convenient when describing systems of well separated identical particles.Pairs of correlated particles, such as those considered in EPR-type thought experiments, undergo chronological disordering at large times, and the analysis of this phenomenon is used to argue physically in favour of asymptotic algebras, which do not contain two-particle observables at infinite times.The second part of the thesis investigates the description of the position of a spinless relativistic particle.Existing Lorentz covariant currents are non-local, i.e. they describe particles which are not strictly localised in a bounded region of space, and these currents are modified so as to describe strictly localised particles, which evolve causally.vi
Despite its name, Quantum Field Theory (QFT) has been built to describe interactions between localizable particles. For this reason the actual formalism of QFT is partly based on a suitable generalization of the one already used for systems of point particles. This circumstance gives rise to a number of conceptual problems, stemming essentially from the fact that the existence within QFT of non-equivalent representations implies the existence of field theories allowing, within the same theory, different, inequivalent, descriptions of particles. This led some authors to claim that in QFT the concept itself of particle should be abandoned. In this paper we will shortly discuss the validity of this claim, as well as the possibilities, so far existing, of building alternative versions of QFT, not designed in advance to allow some kind of particle representation. We will also spend some words about the generalizations of the concept itself of particle which could grant for a better cohabitation of particles and fields within a wider formulation of QFT. The latter is indispensable if we want to extend the range of application of QFT from particle physics or simple condensed matter physics to other domains of scientific research.
We develop the kinematical and operator-algebraic foundations of a groupoid-based relational quantum field theory (RQFT) on curved spacetimes. Indeed, the usual group-based quantum reference frame (QRF) formalism is not directly suited to generic curved Lorentzian backgrounds as global symmetry groups are typically absent or too small. We formulate a notion of QRF for a continuous groupoid. This yields a groupoid relativization map and relational observables. We show that a localization limit recovers the ordinary non-relational description. We construct canonical sharp groupoid QRFs, which form the groupoidal counterpart of the ideal group QRFs based on L2(G)L^2(G)L2(G). We further prove that the groupoid QRF construction reduces to the standard operational QRF formalism for locally compact groups. The action groupoid QRFs are torsor QRFs only for specific classes of fields of positive operator-valued measures (POVMs), and the torsor relativization map only applies to constant operator fields of system observables. We review the foundations of RQFT in Minkowski spacetime. We prove new results that further link RQFT to Wightman QFT. We show that covariant POVMs are μμμ-continuous with respect to quasi-invariant σσσ-finite positive Borel measures μμμ. Thus, relational quantum fields can be understood as the smearing of pointwise-defined kernels with respect to the QRF's statistics. We develop RQFT in curved spacetime, where we argue that the correct replacement for the Poincaré group is the Poincaré groupoid of the spacetime. We also indicate how the framework extends further to internal gauge symmetry and relational gauge-covariant quantum field theory via Atiyah groupoids, providing a first step towards formulating a relational quantum Yang-Mills field theory.
Philosophical reflection on quantum field theory has tended to focus on how it revises our conception of what a particle is. However, there has been relatively little discussion of the threat to the "reality" of particles posed by the possibility of inequivalent quantizations of a classical field theory, i.e., inequivalent representations of the algebra of observables of the field in terms of operators on a Hilbert space. The threat is that each representation embodies its own distinctive conception of what a particle is, and how a "particle" will respond to a suitably operated detector. Our main goal is to clarify the subtle relationship between inequivalent representations of a field theory and their associated particle concepts. We also have a particular interest in the Minkowski versus Rindler quantizations of a free Boson field, because they respectively entail two radically different descriptions of the particle content of the field in the very same region of spacetime. We shall defend the idea that these representations provide complementary descriptions of the same state of the field against the claim that they embody completely incommensurable theories of the field.
Philosophical reflection on quantum field theory has tended to focus on how it revises our conception of what a particle is. However, there has been relatively little discussion of the threat to the ‘reality’ of particles posed by the possibility of inequivalent quantizations of a classical field theory, i.e. inequivalent representations of the algebra of observables of the field in terms of operators on a Hilbert space. The threat is that each representation embodies its own distinctive conception of what a particle is, and how a ‘particle’ will respond to a suitably operated detector. Our main goal is to clarify the subtle relationship between inequivalent representations of a field theory and their associated particle concepts. We also have a particular interest in the Minkowski versus Rindler quantizations of a free Boson field, because they respectively entail two radically different descriptions of the particle content of the field in the very same region of spacetime. We shall defend the idea that these representations provide complementary descriptions of the same state of the field against the claim that they embody completely incommensurable theories of the field.