Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cambridge University Press eBooks

The density matrix and the quantum mechanic Boltzmann equation

Chun‐Lei Tang

Published Jun 23, 2005• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

While the dynamic state of a single particle can be specified quantum mechanically in terms of its state function, any rigorous description of the state of a many-particle system would require the complete knowledge of the dynamic state functions of all the particles. That is not always possible. On the other hand, for a large number of particles in, or near, thermal equilibrium in a uniform sample, the principles of statistical mechanics may be invoked to describe the averaged expectation values of the physically observable properties of such a many-particle system. The basic concepts of the density-matrix formalism and the quantum mechanic analog of the classical Boltzmann equation commonly used for optical and magnetic resonance problems of many-particle quantum systems are introduced in this chapter. Applications of this approach to such specific problems as the resonant interaction of electromagnetic radiation with optical media of two-level atoms, nonlinear optics, and the laser rate equations and transient dynamics are discussed in this chapter. Definitions of the density operator and the density matrix Up to this point, in studying the dynamics of quantum mechanic systems, we have assumed that the state of the system can be specified in terms of a precisely known state function |Ψ〉. On the other hand, for a macroscopic medium containing many particles, it is not always possible to know the exact dynamic states of all the particles in the medium, even for physically identical particles.

DOI
10.1017/cbo9781139165273.012

Related papers

Quantum mechanical density matrix

J. W. Halleý

For systems which obey quantum mechanics, the formulation of the problem of treating large numbers of particles is, of course, somewhat different than it is for classical systems. The microscopic description of the system is provided by a wave function which (in the absence of spin) is a function of the classical coordinates { q i }. The mathematical model is provided by a Hamiltonian operator H which is often obtained from the corresponding classical Hamiltonian by the replacement p i → ( ħ /i)(∂/∂ q i ). In other cases the form of the Hamiltonian operator is simply postulated. The microscopic dynamics are provided by the Schrödinger equation i ħ (∂Ψ/∂ t ) = H Ψ which requires as initial condition the knowledge of the wave function Ψ({ q i }, t ) at some initial time t 0 . (Boundary conditions on Ψ({ q i }, t ) must be specified as part of the description of the model as well.) The results of experiments in quantum mechanics are characterized by operators, usually obtained, like the Hamiltonian, from their classical forms and termed observables. Operators associated with observables must be Hermitian. In general, the various operators corresponding to observables do not commute with one another. It is possible to find sets of commuting operators whose mutual eigenstates span the Hilbert space in which the wave function is confined by the Schrödinger equation and the boundary conditions. A set of such (time independent) eigenstates, termed ψ ν ( q ), is a basis for the Hilbert space.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 16, 2006•0 citations

The Quantum Mechanical Density Operator And Its Time Evolution: Quantum Dynamics Using The Quantum Liouville Equation

Abraham Nitzan

The starting point of the classical description of motion is the Newton equations that yield a phase space trajectory (rN (t), pN (t)) for a given initial condition (rN (0), pN (0)). Alternatively one may describe classical motion in the framework of the Liouville equation (Section (1.2.2)) that describes the time evolution of the phase space probability density f (rN , pN ; t). For a closed system fully described in terms of a well specified initial condition, the two descriptions are completely equivalent. Probabilistic treatment becomes essential in reduced descriptions that focus on parts of an overall system, as was demonstrated in Sections 5.1–5.3 for equilibrium systems, and in Chapters 7 and 8 that focus on the time evolution of classical systems that interact with their thermal environments. This chapter deals with the analogous quantum mechanical problem. Within the limitations imposed by its nature as expressed, for example, by Heisenbergtype uncertainty principles, the Schrödinger equation is deterministic. Obviously it describes a deterministic evolution of the quantum mechanical wavefunction. The analog of the phase space probability density f (rN , pN ; t) is now the quantum mechanical density operator (often referred to as the “density matrix”), whose time evolution is determined by the quantum Liouville equation. Again, when the system is fully described in terms of a well specified initial wavefunction, the two descriptions are equivalent. The density operator formalism can, however, be carried over to situations where the initial state of the system is not well characterized and/or a reduced description of part of the overall system is desired. Such situations are considered later in this chapter.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Apr 6, 2006•1 citation

Quantum Ensembles

Robert H. Swendsen

The study of quantum statistical mechanics begins with a review of the basic principles of quantum mechanics. Schrödinger’s equation is introduced and Eigenstates (or stationary states) are defined. Model probability for quantum statistics is assumed to have a uniform distribution in phases. Wave functions for many-body systems are defined. The density matrix is introduced. The Planck entropy and the microcanonical ensemble are defined. The differences between classical and quantum statistical mechanics are all based on the differing concepts of a microscopic ‘state’. While the classical microscopic state (specified by a point in phase space) determines the exact position and momentum of every particle, the quantum mechanical state determines neither; quantum states can only provide probability distributions for observable quantities.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Dec 10, 2019•0 citations

Density Matrix Equations

Pradip Narayan Ghosh

The quantum mechanical treatment of atom describes a single atom. For the atom in one quantum mechanical state, the observed value is an expectation value which is an average over a large number of measurements of the same physical variable in the same state. The physical explanation of the appearance of Bennett hole is the lower population difference caused by the transition to the upper state of a particular velocity group of atoms that resonate with the radiation frequency. It may be noted that the non-diagonal matrix elements of density matrix play an important role in the transition. The vector model of the density matrix equations illustrates the atomic transitions in the two level atoms in the presence of a near resonant electromagnetic field in a very elegant manner. The description of atom field interaction by a vector model is only analogous to the case of spin-1/2 system in nuclear magnetic resonance.

CRC Press eBooks•Feb 19, 2018•0 citations

The density operator and applications

Brian P. Cowan

Introduction to the density operator Motivation and definition It is often inconvenient, for one reason or another, to keep track of all the variables of a complex system. For example, in a many-body system it would be impracticable to consider the co-ordinates of each particle. Furthermore, such information is actually not of much interest. Thus in a spin system the behaviour of the individual magnetic moments is unimportant; the components of the total magnetisation are the variables of primary interest. Very generally, for a system with ∼ 10 23 co-ordinates, one is unlikely to need more than, say, ten variables to describe its observable properties. However, it is quite clear that this reduced amount of information is no longer sufficient to write down a wavefunction and, therefore, it is no longer possible to calculate the evolution of such a system using the usual methods of quantum mechanics. In Chapter 5 we saw that it was possible, by the introduction of probabilistic arguments, to calculate the evolution of the total magnetisation of a spin system. The calculations were performed using the machinery of quantum mechanics and meaningful and useful results were thereby obtained. In this chapter we will look at things from a rather different point of view. We will not, initially, be concerned with the expectation values of certain specified observables, rather we direct our attention to the general description of the ‘state’ of the system and the way it evolves with time – possibly towards thermal equilibrium.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 17, 1997•0 citations

Density Matrix Formalism. Resolvent Operator

Ole Keller

A detailed account of the density matrix formalism and the resolvent operator theory is given. The statistical mixture of quantum states is described in terms of the density matrix operator, a concept which in an elegant manner allows one to obtain the ensemble average of an observable [a Hermitian operator, which eigenspectrum is complete]. On the basis of an integral equation for the evolution operator, described in the Interaction Representation, the Liouville equation, describing the dynamical evolution of the density matrix operator, is established. A comprehensive analysis of thermal equilibrium in electron systems is presented. For a description of the dynamical time evolution of a system in contact with a heat bath, a reservoir in thermal equilibrium, the den- sity matrix operator approach is shown to be extremely convenient. The Kubo formalism for the time-dependent density matrix is discussed in its most general form. The so-called resolvent propagator formalism is set up starting from a discussion of the analytical part of a Dirac delta function. Having established integral equations for the retarded and advanced scalar propagator operators, the resolvent propagator concept is introduced and analyzed. The resolvent of the Hamiltonian is of particular importance in physics, and the singularities of this resolvent (poles and branch cuts) are identified. We finish by a study of correlated systems in terms of the reduced density matrix operator concept.

CRC Press eBooks•Aug 6, 2024•0 citations
While the dynamic state of a single particle can be specified quantum mechanically in terms of its state function, any rigorous description of the state of a many-particle system would require the complete knowledge of the dynamic state functions of all the particles. That is not always possible. On the other hand, for a large number of particles in, or near, thermal equilibrium in a uniform sample, the principles of statistical mechanics may be invoked to describe the averaged expectation values of the physically observable properties of such a many-particle system. The basic concepts of the density-matrix formalism and the quantum mechanic analog of the classical Boltzmann equation commonly used for optical and magnetic resonance problems of many-particle quantum systems are introduced in this chapter. Applications of this approach to such specific problems as the resonant interaction of electromagnetic radiation with optical media of two-level atoms, nonlinear optics, and the laser rate equations and transient dynamics are discussed in this chapter. Definitions of the density operator and the density matrix Up to this point, in studying the dynamics of quantum mechanic systems, we have assumed that the state of the system can be specified in terms of a precisely known state function |Ψ〉. On the other hand, for a macroscopic medium containing many particles, it is not always possible to know the exact dynamic states of all the particles in the medium, even for physically identical particles.
For systems which obey quantum mechanics, the formulation of the problem of treating large numbers of particles is, of course, somewhat different than it is for classical systems. The microscopic description of the system is provided by a wave function which (in the absence of spin) is a function of the classical coordinates { q i }. The mathematical model is provided by a Hamiltonian operator H which is often obtained from the corresponding classical Hamiltonian by the replacement p i → ( ħ /i)(∂/∂ q i ). In other cases the form of the Hamiltonian operator is simply postulated. The microscopic dynamics are provided by the Schrödinger equation i ħ (∂Ψ/∂ t ) = H Ψ which requires as initial condition the knowledge of the wave function Ψ({ q i }, t ) at some initial time t 0 . (Boundary conditions on Ψ({ q i }, t ) must be specified as part of the description of the model as well.) The results of experiments in quantum mechanics are characterized by operators, usually obtained, like the Hamiltonian, from their classical forms and termed observables. Operators associated with observables must be Hermitian. In general, the various operators corresponding to observables do not commute with one another. It is possible to find sets of commuting operators whose mutual eigenstates span the Hilbert space in which the wave function is confined by the Schrödinger equation and the boundary conditions. A set of such (time independent) eigenstates, termed ψ ν ( q ), is a basis for the Hilbert space.
The starting point of the classical description of motion is the Newton equations that yield a phase space trajectory (rN (t), pN (t)) for a given initial condition (rN (0), pN (0)). Alternatively one may describe classical motion in the framework of the Liouville equation (Section (1.2.2)) that describes the time evolution of the phase space probability density f (rN , pN ; t). For a closed system fully described in terms of a well specified initial condition, the two descriptions are completely equivalent. Probabilistic treatment becomes essential in reduced descriptions that focus on parts of an overall system, as was demonstrated in Sections 5.1–5.3 for equilibrium systems, and in Chapters 7 and 8 that focus on the time evolution of classical systems that interact with their thermal environments. This chapter deals with the analogous quantum mechanical problem. Within the limitations imposed by its nature as expressed, for example, by Heisenbergtype uncertainty principles, the Schrödinger equation is deterministic. Obviously it describes a deterministic evolution of the quantum mechanical wavefunction. The analog of the phase space probability density f (rN , pN ; t) is now the quantum mechanical density operator (often referred to as the “density matrix”), whose time evolution is determined by the quantum Liouville equation. Again, when the system is fully described in terms of a well specified initial wavefunction, the two descriptions are equivalent. The density operator formalism can, however, be carried over to situations where the initial state of the system is not well characterized and/or a reduced description of part of the overall system is desired. Such situations are considered later in this chapter.
The study of quantum statistical mechanics begins with a review of the basic principles of quantum mechanics. Schrödinger’s equation is introduced and Eigenstates (or stationary states) are defined. Model probability for quantum statistics is assumed to have a uniform distribution in phases. Wave functions for many-body systems are defined. The density matrix is introduced. The Planck entropy and the microcanonical ensemble are defined. The differences between classical and quantum statistical mechanics are all based on the differing concepts of a microscopic ‘state’. While the classical microscopic state (specified by a point in phase space) determines the exact position and momentum of every particle, the quantum mechanical state determines neither; quantum states can only provide probability distributions for observable quantities.
The quantum mechanical treatment of atom describes a single atom. For the atom in one quantum mechanical state, the observed value is an expectation value which is an average over a large number of measurements of the same physical variable in the same state. The physical explanation of the appearance of Bennett hole is the lower population difference caused by the transition to the upper state of a particular velocity group of atoms that resonate with the radiation frequency. It may be noted that the non-diagonal matrix elements of density matrix play an important role in the transition. The vector model of the density matrix equations illustrates the atomic transitions in the two level atoms in the presence of a near resonant electromagnetic field in a very elegant manner. The description of atom field interaction by a vector model is only analogous to the case of spin-1/2 system in nuclear magnetic resonance.
Introduction to the density operator Motivation and definition It is often inconvenient, for one reason or another, to keep track of all the variables of a complex system. For example, in a many-body system it would be impracticable to consider the co-ordinates of each particle. Furthermore, such information is actually not of much interest. Thus in a spin system the behaviour of the individual magnetic moments is unimportant; the components of the total magnetisation are the variables of primary interest. Very generally, for a system with ∼ 10 23 co-ordinates, one is unlikely to need more than, say, ten variables to describe its observable properties. However, it is quite clear that this reduced amount of information is no longer sufficient to write down a wavefunction and, therefore, it is no longer possible to calculate the evolution of such a system using the usual methods of quantum mechanics. In Chapter 5 we saw that it was possible, by the introduction of probabilistic arguments, to calculate the evolution of the total magnetisation of a spin system. The calculations were performed using the machinery of quantum mechanics and meaningful and useful results were thereby obtained. In this chapter we will look at things from a rather different point of view. We will not, initially, be concerned with the expectation values of certain specified observables, rather we direct our attention to the general description of the ‘state’ of the system and the way it evolves with time – possibly towards thermal equilibrium.
A detailed account of the density matrix formalism and the resolvent operator theory is given. The statistical mixture of quantum states is described in terms of the density matrix operator, a concept which in an elegant manner allows one to obtain the ensemble average of an observable [a Hermitian operator, which eigenspectrum is complete]. On the basis of an integral equation for the evolution operator, described in the Interaction Representation, the Liouville equation, describing the dynamical evolution of the density matrix operator, is established. A comprehensive analysis of thermal equilibrium in electron systems is presented. For a description of the dynamical time evolution of a system in contact with a heat bath, a reservoir in thermal equilibrium, the den- sity matrix operator approach is shown to be extremely convenient. The Kubo formalism for the time-dependent density matrix is discussed in its most general form. The so-called resolvent propagator formalism is set up starting from a discussion of the analytical part of a Dirac delta function. Having established integral equations for the retarded and advanced scalar propagator operators, the resolvent propagator concept is introduced and analyzed. The resolvent of the Hamiltonian is of particular importance in physics, and the singularities of this resolvent (poles and branch cuts) are identified. We finish by a study of correlated systems in terms of the reduced density matrix operator concept.