Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Deterministic Entanglement Leads to Arrow of Time, Quantum Mechanics, Freewill and Origin of Information

Sylwester Kornowski

Published Jul 1, 2013• 4 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

Abstract: The Everlasting Theory, i.e. the lacking part of ultimate theory, describes the deterministic entanglement characteristic for the Einstein-spacetime components from which the observed matter consists of. Such entanglement leads to the fundamental arrow of time. The exchanged superluminal binary systems of the closed strings, that are responsible for the entanglement, cannot be detected directly. It causes that there appear the uncertainties in the quantum mechanics and experimental data. In reality, the transition from the classical equation of motion via the Poisson brackets to the commutators and equation of motion in the Heisenberg image suggests that the more fundamental level of the quantum physics describes a classical/deterministic theory. The matter-mind asymmetry follows from the torus-circle asymmetry but the matter and the mental structures are built of the same elements i.e. of the Einstein-spacetime components. Due to the entanglement, we can show that the free will follows from the brain-mind resonance. The vibrations in a mind create the magnetic quanta that are some analog to the phonons produced in crystals. Only selected magnetic quanta can induce electric currents in the nerve systems. The freewill is a part of deterministic theory. Due to the classical/deterministic beginning of our cosmos there is obligatory the law of conservation of information. Before the inflation, the unit of time was equal to zero i.e. the space was timeless. 1.

Related papers

Quantum Physics in the Lacking Part of Ultimate Theory

Sylwester Kornowski

Abstract: Here within the lacking part of ultimate theory, i.e. the Everlasting Theory, I derived the fundamental equation of the Matrix Quantum Mechanics i.e. the commutator. It follows from the phase transitions of the fundamental spacetime that are based on the halfintegral-spin constancy. The fundamental equation results from the entanglement that leads to the infinitesimal transformations. In reality, the Matrix Quantum Mechanics that describes excited states of fields, i.e. the quantum particles, is timeless and non-local i.e. nondeterministic. But the Matrix Quantum Mechanics leads to the time-dependent, so deterministic, wave functions that are characteristic for the Statistical Quantum Mechanics. It is the reason why the wave functions appear in the equations of motion. The Statistical Quantum Mechanics or the Quantum Theory of Fields, are the semiclassical/semi-quantum theories. The presented here extended Matrix Quantum Mechanics leads to the methods applied in the Quantum Theory of Fields and points the limitations. 1.

•Apr 1, 2013•6 citations

From Quantum to Reality. Gravity-Induced Quantum Decoherence, Arrow of Time, Matter Self-Assembling, Life, Intelligence, Consciousness, and Free Will. Part One: The Emergence of Classical Reality

Piero Chiarelli

This work aims to address unresolved questions in physics through a coherent framework built upon a unified understanding of the interdependence of gravity, quantum physics, and classical mechanics, ultimately leading to the emergence of physical reality. The approach builds upon Madelung’s quantum hydrodynamic representation, extending it by incorporating stochastic perturbations from gravitational background noise (GBN). The consequent stochastic quantum hydrodynamics model (SQHM) bridges the quantum and classical domains, unveiling a natural quantum-to-classical coexistence. For the first time, the model provides a theoretical foundation for the Lindemann constant and can be experimentally tested via a photon entanglement experiment. It also accurately reproduces the experimental data for the fluid–superfluid transition in helium. The framework resolves long-standing theoretical conflicts between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics, addresses the EPR paradox, and provides novel insights into the emergence of flowing time in 4-D spacetime and the evolution of the universe, potentially accommodating free will. The proposed framework highlights the inadequacy of both deterministic laws and a purely measure-dependent conception of reality governed by unpredictable probabilistic evolution.

•Dec 4, 2025•0 citations

Deterministic Free Will with Resonant Decision Making

Sylwester Kornowski

There is the obvious incompleteness in the description of quantum mechanics (QM). QM makes it impossible to find the right solutions for the greatest secrets of nature such as the matter-antimatter asymmetry, the origin of dark matter (DM) and dark energy, or the difference of mind and brain which leads to the origin of free will and decision making. Here we show that free will is compatible with determinism and that mind is a DM structure.

•Dec 1, 2019•0 citations

QUANTUM MECHANICS – DETERMINISTIC VS. PROBABILISTIC

Péter Vadász

A deterministic quantum mechanics theory is presented. The proposed theory is shown to be consistent with the current mainstream statistical quantum theory as well as with classical physics. It produces solutions that demonstrate that causality, physical reality, and determinism are restored and can explain in simple form concerns raised by results from the current mainstream statistical quantum theory. The meaning of particle-wave duality and complementarity, the possibility of a particle, like an electron, crossing through the nucleus as it does when the angular momentum of the electron is zero at the ground state of the hydrogen atom, the possibility of a point-size particle to have an “intrinsic spin,” the possibility of “quantum jumps” as the electron transitions instantaneously from one stable orbital to another without passing through the space in between the orbitals and does that at irregular time intervals. The natural collapse of the wave function as part of the solution is a result that emerges from the proposed deterministic quantum mechanics theory. The phenomenon of entanglement is also discussed in the context that information transfer between entangled “particles” does not occur in a superluminal fashion and is not a “spooky action at a distance” but rather the local measurement of global property. A linear stability method presents actual analytical solutions consistent with current mainstream quantum theory and classical physics. The Bohr-Schrödinger energy levels leading to the experimentally confirmed spectral lines and the fine structure constant emerge from an approximate solution to these equations.

14th CONSTRUCTAL LAW CONFERENCE | 10-11 October 2024 Bucharest Romania•Dec 18, 2024•0 citations

Deterministic Quantum Mechanics – Part I – Conceptual Framework

Péter Vadász

A deterministic quantum mechanics theory is presented in a series of papers starting with the present one. The proposed theory is shown to be consistent with the current mainstream statistical quantum theory as well as with classical physics. It produces solutions, which demonstrate that causality, physical reality, and determinism are restored and can explain in simple form concerns that are raised by results from the current mainstream statistical quantum theory. The meaning of particle- wave duality and complementarity, the possibility of a particle, like the electron, to cross through the nucleus as it does when the angular momentum of the electron is zero at the ground state of the hydrogen atom, the possibility of a point-size particle to have an “intrinsic spin”, the possibility of “quantum jumps” as the electron transitions instantaneously from one stable orbital to another without passing through the space in between the orbitals and does that at irregular time intervals, and the natural collapse of the wave function as part of the solution are some of the results that emerge from the proposed deterministic quantum mechanics theory. The phenomenon of entanglement is shown to be consistent with the proposed deterministic quantum mechanics theory. The Bohr-Schrödinger energy levels leading to the experimentally confirmed spectral lines, as well as the fine structure constant emerge directly from the solution of the equations governing theproposed deterministic quantum mechanics presented in Part II of these series of papers.

•May 20, 2024•2 citations

Mind and matter - The quantum mind!

I Dinakar

The mind–matter relationship remained in the domain of philosophers for aeons. However, the inquisitiveness of the scientific minds has always been trying to understand the science behind its various functions. The scientific temper ushered in by the Renaissance about the 15th century saw the scientists exploring this problem from a science point of view. Technological advances during the later part of the 20th century enabled neuroscientists to explore and localise functions of the brain. However, the most difficult has been understanding the origin of a conscious experience scientifically or materialistically. Despite the delineation of many functions of the brain, the origin of conscious experience, the qualia, in the material brain remains elusive, so much so it came to be called the holy grail of neuroscience. Heisenberg wrote: ‘Physics entered the domain of philosophy with the emergence of consciousness in quantum observation, which incidentally opened the door for reconciliation of science and philosophy’,[1] an event which enabled the predictions of Snow of the merging of arts and sciences.[2,3] Quantum mechanics is a branch of physics relating to very small particles – subatomic particles – electrons, photons, and everything in the submolecular realm, being the smallest units in matter. Quantum theory is the most fundamental theory of matter available at present. Some basic concepts of quantum physics need to be understood. These include “superposition”, where in subatomic particles exist either as waves or particles in a dual nature, never simultaneously. They exist as waves in more than one place at a time and once an observer observes or interferes with (such as measuring) their superposition state collapses to particle state. Quantum entanglement is the phenomenon that occurs when a group of particles which are generated, interact with or share special proximity such that they remain connected even when separated by vast distances. Consciousness is a manifestation of quantum process. Q mind or Q consciousness comprises a group of hypotheses proposing that quantum mechanical phenomena such as entanglement and superposition may play an important part in the functions of the brain and could thus explain the origin of consciousness. Several theories of quantum consciousness have been proposed. Wigner proposed the idea that quantum mechanics has something to do with the workings of the mind and proposed that the wave function collapse in the interaction with conscious observation creates consciousness.[4] Vitiello and Freeman[5] proposed quantum field theory (QFT) of brain states. This theory deals with systems and provides formal elements from which a standard description of brain activity can be inferred. According to QFT, particles are only excited states or simply manifestations of a field. Every particle has its own field that covers all of the universe, which means that, according to QFT, all of the electrons of the universe belong to the same field and could be regarded as one. Bohm formulated the QFT as a deeper theory of quantum theory plus relativity.[6] He viewed mind and matter as projections into our explicate order underlying the implicate order. Quantum brain dynamics (QBD) hypothesis explains the function of the brain within the framework of QFT.[7] It is not yet known exactly how quantum superpositions and their collapse result in the genesis of the raw feels of consciousness, the qualia. Feynman stated ‘if you think you understand quantum mechanics then you do not!’[8] Pribram proposed the holonomic brain theory (quantum holography). He invoked quantum mechanics to explain the higher-order processing by the mind. Pribram provided evidence on how much of the processes in the brain take place in a distributed fashion.[9,10] The composite model of Pribram-Bohm of holoflux hypothesis addresses observed phenomenon of non-locality both spacially and temporally. Bose and Einstein, who first predicted Bose Einstein condensate proposed that water at dendritic membrane surfaces might operate by structuring condensation,[11] supporting QBD. Penrose and Hamoreff proposed the orchestrated-objective reduction (ORCH-OR) in 1989 through 2013. According to them, the microtubules in the neurons (neurotubules), the tubulin protein polymer at the site of quantum collapse, leads to conscious experience. The quantum superposed states which develop in the tubulins remain coherent and recruit more superposed tubulins until a mass-time-energy threshold is reached. At this point, self-collapse or objective reduction occurs, which is equated to a discrete conscious event. Cascades of ORCH-OR events give rise to the stream of consciousness.[12,13] Penrose suggested that objective reduction represents neither randomness nor algorithmic processing but instead a non-computable influence in spacetime geometry from which mathematical understanding and, by later extension, consciousness derives.[14] Quantum vibrations in the microtubules proposed by Bandyopadhyay[15] have been shown to be source of conscious experience by corroborating the Penrose-Hemeroff’s ORCH-OR hypothesis.[13,16] In April 2022, the results of two related experiments at the University of Alberta and Princeton University, announced at The Science of Consciousness conference, provided further evidence to support quantum processes operating within microtubules. However, in another experiment, Gregory D. Scholes and Aarat Kalra of Princeton University used lasers to excite molecules within tubulins, causing a prolonged excitation to diffuse through microtubules further than expected, which did not occur when repeated under anaesthesia.[17,18] Beck and Eccles considered quantum mechanics at the synaptic level. If Orchestrated objective reduction (ORCH-OR) theory is applicable, a similar phenomenon in the microtubules at the presynaptic level, the axon terminal could be invoked for the genesis of consciousness.[19] A recent study by scientists at Trinity College, Dublin, in October 2022,[20] suggests that quantum processes underlie the cognitive and conscious brain functions. The brain–mind operational architectonics is the boundary between and integration point of quantum physics and eastern metaphysics and that it may inspire building a richer and more inclusive paradigm of the brain–mind relation, where quantum physics and eastern metaphysics are inherently intertwined. A body of empirical evidence[21-24] supports these possibilities, strengthening the proposal that the mind–brain relationship may be partially quantum. Quantum information theory clarifies the distinction between the unobservable mind and the observable brain and supports a solid physical foundation for consciousness research. With all these theories trying to explain and understand the theoretical/hypothetical framework for consciousness to explain the subjective experience of consciousness, the experts of this field feel it is still a long way to bridge the gap between current neurobiological and physical–mathematical concepts with their associated quantum–mind theories. Though there is still a long way to go for explaining conscious experience scientifically, when ever this happens, it will become one of the benchmarks in science. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest. Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the preparation of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

The Journal of Clinical and Scientific Research•Apr 1, 2025•0 citations
Abstract: The Everlasting Theory, i.e. the lacking part of ultimate theory, describes the deterministic entanglement characteristic for the Einstein-spacetime components from which the observed matter consists of. Such entanglement leads to the fundamental arrow of time. The exchanged superluminal binary systems of the closed strings, that are responsible for the entanglement, cannot be detected directly. It causes that there appear the uncertainties in the quantum mechanics and experimental data. In reality, the transition from the classical equation of motion via the Poisson brackets to the commutators and equation of motion in the Heisenberg image suggests that the more fundamental level of the quantum physics describes a classical/deterministic theory. The matter-mind asymmetry follows from the torus-circle asymmetry but the matter and the mental structures are built of the same elements i.e. of the Einstein-spacetime components. Due to the entanglement, we can show that the free will follows from the brain-mind resonance. The vibrations in a mind create the magnetic quanta that are some analog to the phonons produced in crystals. Only selected magnetic quanta can induce electric currents in the nerve systems. The freewill is a part of deterministic theory. Due to the classical/deterministic beginning of our cosmos there is obligatory the law of conservation of information. Before the inflation, the unit of time was equal to zero i.e. the space was timeless. 1.
Abstract: Here within the lacking part of ultimate theory, i.e. the Everlasting Theory, I derived the fundamental equation of the Matrix Quantum Mechanics i.e. the commutator. It follows from the phase transitions of the fundamental spacetime that are based on the halfintegral-spin constancy. The fundamental equation results from the entanglement that leads to the infinitesimal transformations. In reality, the Matrix Quantum Mechanics that describes excited states of fields, i.e. the quantum particles, is timeless and non-local i.e. nondeterministic. But the Matrix Quantum Mechanics leads to the time-dependent, so deterministic, wave functions that are characteristic for the Statistical Quantum Mechanics. It is the reason why the wave functions appear in the equations of motion. The Statistical Quantum Mechanics or the Quantum Theory of Fields, are the semiclassical/semi-quantum theories. The presented here extended Matrix Quantum Mechanics leads to the methods applied in the Quantum Theory of Fields and points the limitations. 1.
This work aims to address unresolved questions in physics through a coherent framework built upon a unified understanding of the interdependence of gravity, quantum physics, and classical mechanics, ultimately leading to the emergence of physical reality. The approach builds upon Madelung’s quantum hydrodynamic representation, extending it by incorporating stochastic perturbations from gravitational background noise (GBN). The consequent stochastic quantum hydrodynamics model (SQHM) bridges the quantum and classical domains, unveiling a natural quantum-to-classical coexistence. For the first time, the model provides a theoretical foundation for the Lindemann constant and can be experimentally tested via a photon entanglement experiment. It also accurately reproduces the experimental data for the fluid–superfluid transition in helium. The framework resolves long-standing theoretical conflicts between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics, addresses the EPR paradox, and provides novel insights into the emergence of flowing time in 4-D spacetime and the evolution of the universe, potentially accommodating free will. The proposed framework highlights the inadequacy of both deterministic laws and a purely measure-dependent conception of reality governed by unpredictable probabilistic evolution.
A deterministic quantum mechanics theory is presented. The proposed theory is shown to be consistent with the current mainstream statistical quantum theory as well as with classical physics. It produces solutions that demonstrate that causality, physical reality, and determinism are restored and can explain in simple form concerns raised by results from the current mainstream statistical quantum theory. The meaning of particle-wave duality and complementarity, the possibility of a particle, like an electron, crossing through the nucleus as it does when the angular momentum of the electron is zero at the ground state of the hydrogen atom, the possibility of a point-size particle to have an “intrinsic spin,” the possibility of “quantum jumps” as the electron transitions instantaneously from one stable orbital to another without passing through the space in between the orbitals and does that at irregular time intervals. The natural collapse of the wave function as part of the solution is a result that emerges from the proposed deterministic quantum mechanics theory. The phenomenon of entanglement is also discussed in the context that information transfer between entangled “particles” does not occur in a superluminal fashion and is not a “spooky action at a distance” but rather the local measurement of global property. A linear stability method presents actual analytical solutions consistent with current mainstream quantum theory and classical physics. The Bohr-Schrödinger energy levels leading to the experimentally confirmed spectral lines and the fine structure constant emerge from an approximate solution to these equations.
A deterministic quantum mechanics theory is presented in a series of papers starting with the present one. The proposed theory is shown to be consistent with the current mainstream statistical quantum theory as well as with classical physics. It produces solutions, which demonstrate that causality, physical reality, and determinism are restored and can explain in simple form concerns that are raised by results from the current mainstream statistical quantum theory. The meaning of particle- wave duality and complementarity, the possibility of a particle, like the electron, to cross through the nucleus as it does when the angular momentum of the electron is zero at the ground state of the hydrogen atom, the possibility of a point-size particle to have an “intrinsic spin”, the possibility of “quantum jumps” as the electron transitions instantaneously from one stable orbital to another without passing through the space in between the orbitals and does that at irregular time intervals, and the natural collapse of the wave function as part of the solution are some of the results that emerge from the proposed deterministic quantum mechanics theory. The phenomenon of entanglement is shown to be consistent with the proposed deterministic quantum mechanics theory. The Bohr-Schrödinger energy levels leading to the experimentally confirmed spectral lines, as well as the fine structure constant emerge directly from the solution of the equations governing theproposed deterministic quantum mechanics presented in Part II of these series of papers.
The mind–matter relationship remained in the domain of philosophers for aeons. However, the inquisitiveness of the scientific minds has always been trying to understand the science behind its various functions. The scientific temper ushered in by the Renaissance about the 15th century saw the scientists exploring this problem from a science point of view. Technological advances during the later part of the 20th century enabled neuroscientists to explore and localise functions of the brain. However, the most difficult has been understanding the origin of a conscious experience scientifically or materialistically. Despite the delineation of many functions of the brain, the origin of conscious experience, the qualia, in the material brain remains elusive, so much so it came to be called the holy grail of neuroscience. Heisenberg wrote: ‘Physics entered the domain of philosophy with the emergence of consciousness in quantum observation, which incidentally opened the door for reconciliation of science and philosophy’,[1] an event which enabled the predictions of Snow of the merging of arts and sciences.[2,3] Quantum mechanics is a branch of physics relating to very small particles – subatomic particles – electrons, photons, and everything in the submolecular realm, being the smallest units in matter. Quantum theory is the most fundamental theory of matter available at present. Some basic concepts of quantum physics need to be understood. These include “superposition”, where in subatomic particles exist either as waves or particles in a dual nature, never simultaneously. They exist as waves in more than one place at a time and once an observer observes or interferes with (such as measuring) their superposition state collapses to particle state. Quantum entanglement is the phenomenon that occurs when a group of particles which are generated, interact with or share special proximity such that they remain connected even when separated by vast distances. Consciousness is a manifestation of quantum process. Q mind or Q consciousness comprises a group of hypotheses proposing that quantum mechanical phenomena such as entanglement and superposition may play an important part in the functions of the brain and could thus explain the origin of consciousness. Several theories of quantum consciousness have been proposed. Wigner proposed the idea that quantum mechanics has something to do with the workings of the mind and proposed that the wave function collapse in the interaction with conscious observation creates consciousness.[4] Vitiello and Freeman[5] proposed quantum field theory (QFT) of brain states. This theory deals with systems and provides formal elements from which a standard description of brain activity can be inferred. According to QFT, particles are only excited states or simply manifestations of a field. Every particle has its own field that covers all of the universe, which means that, according to QFT, all of the electrons of the universe belong to the same field and could be regarded as one. Bohm formulated the QFT as a deeper theory of quantum theory plus relativity.[6] He viewed mind and matter as projections into our explicate order underlying the implicate order. Quantum brain dynamics (QBD) hypothesis explains the function of the brain within the framework of QFT.[7] It is not yet known exactly how quantum superpositions and their collapse result in the genesis of the raw feels of consciousness, the qualia. Feynman stated ‘if you think you understand quantum mechanics then you do not!’[8] Pribram proposed the holonomic brain theory (quantum holography). He invoked quantum mechanics to explain the higher-order processing by the mind. Pribram provided evidence on how much of the processes in the brain take place in a distributed fashion.[9,10] The composite model of Pribram-Bohm of holoflux hypothesis addresses observed phenomenon of non-locality both spacially and temporally. Bose and Einstein, who first predicted Bose Einstein condensate proposed that water at dendritic membrane surfaces might operate by structuring condensation,[11] supporting QBD. Penrose and Hamoreff proposed the orchestrated-objective reduction (ORCH-OR) in 1989 through 2013. According to them, the microtubules in the neurons (neurotubules), the tubulin protein polymer at the site of quantum collapse, leads to conscious experience. The quantum superposed states which develop in the tubulins remain coherent and recruit more superposed tubulins until a mass-time-energy threshold is reached. At this point, self-collapse or objective reduction occurs, which is equated to a discrete conscious event. Cascades of ORCH-OR events give rise to the stream of consciousness.[12,13] Penrose suggested that objective reduction represents neither randomness nor algorithmic processing but instead a non-computable influence in spacetime geometry from which mathematical understanding and, by later extension, consciousness derives.[14] Quantum vibrations in the microtubules proposed by Bandyopadhyay[15] have been shown to be source of conscious experience by corroborating the Penrose-Hemeroff’s ORCH-OR hypothesis.[13,16] In April 2022, the results of two related experiments at the University of Alberta and Princeton University, announced at The Science of Consciousness conference, provided further evidence to support quantum processes operating within microtubules. However, in another experiment, Gregory D. Scholes and Aarat Kalra of Princeton University used lasers to excite molecules within tubulins, causing a prolonged excitation to diffuse through microtubules further than expected, which did not occur when repeated under anaesthesia.[17,18] Beck and Eccles considered quantum mechanics at the synaptic level. If Orchestrated objective reduction (ORCH-OR) theory is applicable, a similar phenomenon in the microtubules at the presynaptic level, the axon terminal could be invoked for the genesis of consciousness.[19] A recent study by scientists at Trinity College, Dublin, in October 2022,[20] suggests that quantum processes underlie the cognitive and conscious brain functions. The brain–mind operational architectonics is the boundary between and integration point of quantum physics and eastern metaphysics and that it may inspire building a richer and more inclusive paradigm of the brain–mind relation, where quantum physics and eastern metaphysics are inherently intertwined. A body of empirical evidence[21-24] supports these possibilities, strengthening the proposal that the mind–brain relationship may be partially quantum. Quantum information theory clarifies the distinction between the unobservable mind and the observable brain and supports a solid physical foundation for consciousness research. With all these theories trying to explain and understand the theoretical/hypothetical framework for consciousness to explain the subjective experience of consciousness, the experts of this field feel it is still a long way to bridge the gap between current neurobiological and physical–mathematical concepts with their associated quantum–mind theories. Though there is still a long way to go for explaining conscious experience scientifically, when ever this happens, it will become one of the benchmarks in science. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest. Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the preparation of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.