Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

NATO ASI series. Series B : Physics

The Breakdown of the Superposition Principle

F. Károlyházy

Published Jan 1, 1990• 7 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4684-8771-8_13

Related papers

The Principle of Superposition

Leon Gunther

Springer eBooks•Jul 31, 2011•9 citations

Is There a Relation Between the Breakdown of the Superposition Principle and an Indeterminacy in the Structure of the Einsteinian Space-Time?

Andor Frenkel

The Western Ontario series in philosophy of science•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations

Principles of superposition

B. G. Neal

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 1964•0 citations

On the role of gravitation in the possible breakdown of the quantum superposition principle for macroscopic systems

Jesús Unturbe, J. L. Sánchez‐Gómez

Il Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. B/Il Nuovo cimento B•Feb 1, 1992•9 citations

Why the Quantum Must Yield to Gravity

Joy Christian

After providing an extensive overview of the conceptual elements – such as Einstein’s ‘hole argument ’ – that underpin Penrose’s proposal for gravitationally induced quantum state reduction, the proposal is constructively criticised. Penrose has suggested a mechanism for objective reduction of quantum states with postulated collapse time τ = ¯h/∆E, where ∆E is an ill-definedness in the gravitational self-energy stemming from the profound conflict between the principles of superposition and general covariance. Here it is argued that, even if Penrose’s overall conceptual scheme for the breakdown of quantum mechanics is unreservedly accepted, his formula for the collapse time of superpositions reduces to τ → ∞ (∆E → 0) in the strictly Newtonian regime, which is the domain of his proposed experiment to corroborate the effect. A suggestion is made to rectify this situation. In particular, recognising the cogency of Penrose’s reasoning in the domain of full ‘quantum gravity’, it is demonstrated that an appropriate experiment which could in principle corroborate his argued ‘macroscopic ’ breakdown of superpositions is not the one involving non-rotating mass distributions as he has suggested, but a Leggett-type SQUID or BEC

•Sep 13, 2013•27 citations

A theoretical justification for the superposition principle

Mohammad Barzegar-Jalali

International Journal of Pharmaceutics•Jan 1, 1983•2 citations
After providing an extensive overview of the conceptual elements – such as Einstein’s ‘hole argument ’ – that underpin Penrose’s proposal for gravitationally induced quantum state reduction, the proposal is constructively criticised. Penrose has suggested a mechanism for objective reduction of quantum states with postulated collapse time τ = ¯h/∆E, where ∆E is an ill-definedness in the gravitational self-energy stemming from the profound conflict between the principles of superposition and general covariance. Here it is argued that, even if Penrose’s overall conceptual scheme for the breakdown of quantum mechanics is unreservedly accepted, his formula for the collapse time of superpositions reduces to τ → ∞ (∆E → 0) in the strictly Newtonian regime, which is the domain of his proposed experiment to corroborate the effect. A suggestion is made to rectify this situation. In particular, recognising the cogency of Penrose’s reasoning in the domain of full ‘quantum gravity’, it is demonstrated that an appropriate experiment which could in principle corroborate his argued ‘macroscopic ’ breakdown of superpositions is not the one involving non-rotating mass distributions as he has suggested, but a Leggett-type SQUID or BEC