Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Il Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. B/Il Nuovo cimento B

On the role of gravitation in the possible breakdown of the quantum superposition principle for macroscopic systems

Jesús Unturbe, J. L. Sánchez‐Gómez

Published Feb 1, 1992• 9 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf02722918

Related papers

On the Possible Connections between Quantum Mechanics and Gravitation

A. Frenkel

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1977•0 citations

Collapse models and gravitational decoherence at test: how far can we push the limits of quantum mechanics?

Matteo Carlesso

Collapse models describe the breakdown of the quantum superposition principle when moving from microscopic to macroscopic scales. They are among the possible solutions to the quantum measurement problem and thus describe the emergence of classical mechanics from the quantum one. Testing collapse models is equivalent to test the limits of quantum mechanics. I will provide an overview on how one can test collapse models, and which are the future theoretical and experimental challenges ahead.

arXiv:2303.05284•Optical and Quantum Sensing and Precision Metrology II•Mar 8, 2023•0 citations

Structural Limits of Quantum Superposition in Mass-Generating Systems

Lisa Doumbouya

Quantum mechanics provides an extraordinarily accurate description of microscopic systems, yet persistent conceptual difficulties arise when its superposition principle is naively extended to systems involving significant mass displacement. In particular, macroscopic superpositions imply the coexistence of distinct gravitational field configurations, raising questions of spacetime consistency rather than measurement or environmental interaction. This short note argues that the apparent breakdown of macroscopic superposition does not require a collapse mechanism or modification of quantum dynamics. Instead, it reflects a structural admissibility constraint: spacetime permits only one future-consistent geometry sourced by mass. From this perspective, the absence of macroscopic superpositions is a consequence of structural selection rather than dynamical collapse, reframing long-standing debates surrounding quantum mechanics and gravity.

•Dec 20, 2025•0 citations

Gravitation and quantum mechanics of macroscopic objects

F. Károlyházy

Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. A, Nuclei, particles and fields•Mar 1, 1966•530 citations

On the effectiveness of the collapse in the Diósi–Penrose model

Laria Figurato, Marco Dirindin, José Luis Gaona-Reyes +3 more

Abstract The possibility that gravity plays a role in the collapse of the quantum wave function has been considered in the literature, and it is of relevance not only because it would provide a solution to the measurement problem in quantum theory, but also because it would give a new and unexpected twist to the search for a unified theory of quantum and gravitational phenomena, possibly overcoming the current impasse. The Diósi–Penrose model is the most popular incarnation of this idea. It predicts a progressive breakdown of quantum superpositions when the mass of the system increases; as such, it is susceptible to experimental verification. Current experiments set a lower bound R 0 ≳ 4 Å for the free parameter of the model, excluding some versions of it. In this work we search for an upper bound, coming from the request that the collapse is effective enough to guarantee classicality at the macroscopic scale: we find out that not all macroscopic systems collapse effectively. If one relaxes this request, a reasonable (although to some degree arbitrary) bound is found to be: R 0 ≲ 10 6 Å. This will serve to better direct future experiments to further test the model.

arXiv:2406.18494•New Journal of Physics•Oct 29, 2024•12 citations

Gravitation and quantum-mechanical localization of macro-objects

L. Diósi

arXiv:1412.0201•Physics Letters A•Oct 1, 1984•431 citations
Quantum mechanics provides an extraordinarily accurate description of microscopic systems, yet persistent conceptual difficulties arise when its superposition principle is naively extended to systems involving significant mass displacement. In particular, macroscopic superpositions imply the coexistence of distinct gravitational field configurations, raising questions of spacetime consistency rather than measurement or environmental interaction. This short note argues that the apparent breakdown of macroscopic superposition does not require a collapse mechanism or modification of quantum dynamics. Instead, it reflects a structural admissibility constraint: spacetime permits only one future-consistent geometry sourced by mass. From this perspective, the absence of macroscopic superpositions is a consequence of structural selection rather than dynamical collapse, reframing long-standing debates surrounding quantum mechanics and gravity.
Abstract The possibility that gravity plays a role in the collapse of the quantum wave function has been considered in the literature, and it is of relevance not only because it would provide a solution to the measurement problem in quantum theory, but also because it would give a new and unexpected twist to the search for a unified theory of quantum and gravitational phenomena, possibly overcoming the current impasse. The Diósi–Penrose model is the most popular incarnation of this idea. It predicts a progressive breakdown of quantum superpositions when the mass of the system increases; as such, it is susceptible to experimental verification. Current experiments set a lower bound R 0 ≳ 4 Å for the free parameter of the model, excluding some versions of it. In this work we search for an upper bound, coming from the request that the collapse is effective enough to guarantee classicality at the macroscopic scale: we find out that not all macroscopic systems collapse effectively. If one relaxes this request, a reasonable (although to some degree arbitrary) bound is found to be: R 0 ≲ 10 6 Å. This will serve to better direct future experiments to further test the model.