Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Teleportation in One-dimensional Quantum Dots

Birck Poster Sessions, Hefeng Wang, Sabre Kais

Published Jan 1, 2008• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

The dream of teleportation is to be able to travelby simply reappearing at some distant location. Itmight appear that one could scan the object andsend the information so that the object can bereconstructed at the destination. In conventionalfacsimile transmission an original object isscanned to extract partial information about it.The scanned information is sent to the receivingstation, where it is used to produce anapproximate copy of the original object. Theoriginal remains intact after the scanning process.By contrast, in quantum teleportation, theuncertainty principle forbids any scanningprocess from extracting all the information in aquantum state. Charles H. Bennett and hiscoworkers showed that a quantum state can beteleported provides one does not know that stateusing a celebrated and paradoxical feature ofquantum mechanics known as the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) effect. In brief, they found away to scan out part of the information from anobject

Related papers

Quantum Teleportation in Quantum Dots System

Klaus D. Sattler

By quantum teleportation an unknown quantum state is destroyed at a sending place while its perfect replica state appears at a remote place via dual quantum and classical channels. Quantum teleportation allows for the transmission of quantum information to a distant location despite the impossibility of measuring or broadcasting the information to be transmitted. e classical teleportation is like a fax in which one could scan an object and send the information so that the object can be reconstructed at the destination. In this conventional facsimile transmission, the original object is scanned to extract partial information about it. e scanned information is then sent to the receiving station, where it is used to produce an approximate copy of the original object. e original object remains intact a er the scanning process. By contrast, in quantum teleportation, the uncertainty principle forbids any scanning process from extracting all the information in a quantum state. e nonlocal property of quantum mechanics enables the striking phenomenon of quantum teleportation. Bennett and coworkers28 showed that a quantum state can be teleported, provided one does not know that state, using a celebrated and paradoxical feature of quantum mechanics known as the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) e ect.11 ey found a way to scan out part of the information from an object A, which one wishes to teleport, while causing the remaining part of the information to pass to an object B, via the EPR e ect. In this process, two objects B and C form an entangled pair; object C is taken to the sending station, while object B is taken to the receiving station. At the sending station, object C is scanned together with the original object A, yielding some information and totally disrupting the state of A and C. e scanned information is sent to the receiving station, where it is used to select one of several treatments to be applied to object B, thereby putting B into an exact replica of the former state of A.

CRC Press eBooks•Apr 19, 2016•0 citations

Quantum Teleportation

Ciarán Hughes, Joshua Isaacson, Anastasia Perry +2 more

Abstract One interesting application of entanglement is quantum teleportation, which is a technique for transferring an unknown quantum state from one place to another. In science fiction, teleportation generally involves a machine scanning a person and another machine reassembling the person on the other end. The original body disintegrates and no longer exists. Similarly, quantum teleportation works by “scanning” the original qubit, sending a recipe, and reconstructing the qubit elsewhere. The original qubit is not physically destroyed in the science fiction sense, but it is no longer in the same state. Otherwise, the previously mentioned no-cloning theorem—which states that a qubit cannot be exactly copied onto another qubit—would be violated.1 As we will see, the “scanning” part poses a problem which can only be solved by leveraging quantum entanglement.

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2021•0 citations

All-quantum teleportation

N. G. de Almeida

I propose to replace the dual classical and nonlocal channels used for teleporting unknown quantum states in the original protocol (OP) [Bennett, C. H., et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 1895 (1993)] by either (i) one single quantum channel or (ii) two nonlocal channels in order to turn the OP into an all-quantum teleportation (AQT) protocol. Ideally, N runs of single channel AQT can be achieved with a single Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) pair, in contrast with the OP, which consumes N EPR pairs. In the two nonlocal channels proposal, Alice uses the superdense coding technique to send Bob her result, which makes AQT more economical than OP.

arXiv:1703.07278•Mar 21, 2017•0 citations

Toward quantum teleporting living objects

Qing Qing

In American science fiction television series Star Trek,teleporting crews from the spaceship to the surface of a planet was one of the most impressive scenes,as shown in Fig.1.Teleportation was believed to be a beautiful dream until 1993,when a seminal paper by Bennett et al.[1]showed that with the help of classical communication and quantum entanglement,a qubit can be transferred from one location to another,without moving a physical particle

中国科学通报：英文版•Jan 1, 2016•0 citations

Applications of EPR steering in quantum teleportation and NOON states

L. Rosales-Zárate

Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) steering refers to the type of correlations described in the EPR paradox, where one observer seems to affect (”steer”) the state of other observer by using local measurements. There have been several works regarding characterization and quantification of EPR steering. One characteristic of this non-local correlation is that it can be asymmetric, while entanglement is symmetric. This asymmetric property is relevant for potential applications of EPR steering to quantum information, in particular to quantum cryptography and quantum teleportation. This latter refers to the process where one observer sends an unknown quantum state to Bob, who is in a different location. They communicate by classical means. Here we will show that EPR steering is a necessary resource to obtain secure continuous variable teleportation. We will also consider NOON states, which is an example of an entangled state. For this state, we will present a steering signature. This contribution reviews the work derived in Refs. [1] and [2], which was presented as an invited talk in ELAF 2017.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2018•0 citations

Teleportation of continuous quantum variables

Samuel L. Braunstein, Harry J. Kimble, Y. Sorensen +2 more

Summary form only given. A particularly startling discovery by Bennett et al. is the possibility for teleportation of a quantum state, whereby an unknown state of a spin-1/2 particle is transported by Alice from a sending station to Bob at a receiving terminal by conveying 2 bits of classical information. Beyond the context of dichotomic variables, Vaidman has analyzed teleportation of the wave function of a one-dimensional particle in a beautiful variation of the original EPR paradox. Here we extend Vaidman's analysis to incorporate finite (nonsingular) degrees of correlation among the relevant particles.

Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics•Nov 27, 2002•7 citations
The dream of teleportation is to be able to travelby simply reappearing at some distant location. Itmight appear that one could scan the object andsend the information so that the object can bereconstructed at the destination. In conventionalfacsimile transmission an original object isscanned to extract partial information about it.The scanned information is sent to the receivingstation, where it is used to produce anapproximate copy of the original object. Theoriginal remains intact after the scanning process.By contrast, in quantum teleportation, theuncertainty principle forbids any scanningprocess from extracting all the information in aquantum state. Charles H. Bennett and hiscoworkers showed that a quantum state can beteleported provides one does not know that stateusing a celebrated and paradoxical feature ofquantum mechanics known as the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) effect. In brief, they found away to scan out part of the information from anobject
By quantum teleportation an unknown quantum state is destroyed at a sending place while its perfect replica state appears at a remote place via dual quantum and classical channels. Quantum teleportation allows for the transmission of quantum information to a distant location despite the impossibility of measuring or broadcasting the information to be transmitted. e classical teleportation is like a fax in which one could scan an object and send the information so that the object can be reconstructed at the destination. In this conventional facsimile transmission, the original object is scanned to extract partial information about it. e scanned information is then sent to the receiving station, where it is used to produce an approximate copy of the original object. e original object remains intact a er the scanning process. By contrast, in quantum teleportation, the uncertainty principle forbids any scanning process from extracting all the information in a quantum state. e nonlocal property of quantum mechanics enables the striking phenomenon of quantum teleportation. Bennett and coworkers28 showed that a quantum state can be teleported, provided one does not know that state, using a celebrated and paradoxical feature of quantum mechanics known as the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) e ect.11 ey found a way to scan out part of the information from an object A, which one wishes to teleport, while causing the remaining part of the information to pass to an object B, via the EPR e ect. In this process, two objects B and C form an entangled pair; object C is taken to the sending station, while object B is taken to the receiving station. At the sending station, object C is scanned together with the original object A, yielding some information and totally disrupting the state of A and C. e scanned information is sent to the receiving station, where it is used to select one of several treatments to be applied to object B, thereby putting B into an exact replica of the former state of A.
Abstract One interesting application of entanglement is quantum teleportation, which is a technique for transferring an unknown quantum state from one place to another. In science fiction, teleportation generally involves a machine scanning a person and another machine reassembling the person on the other end. The original body disintegrates and no longer exists. Similarly, quantum teleportation works by “scanning” the original qubit, sending a recipe, and reconstructing the qubit elsewhere. The original qubit is not physically destroyed in the science fiction sense, but it is no longer in the same state. Otherwise, the previously mentioned no-cloning theorem—which states that a qubit cannot be exactly copied onto another qubit—would be violated.1 As we will see, the “scanning” part poses a problem which can only be solved by leveraging quantum entanglement.
I propose to replace the dual classical and nonlocal channels used for teleporting unknown quantum states in the original protocol (OP) [Bennett, C. H., et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 1895 (1993)] by either (i) one single quantum channel or (ii) two nonlocal channels in order to turn the OP into an all-quantum teleportation (AQT) protocol. Ideally, N runs of single channel AQT can be achieved with a single Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) pair, in contrast with the OP, which consumes N EPR pairs. In the two nonlocal channels proposal, Alice uses the superdense coding technique to send Bob her result, which makes AQT more economical than OP.
Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) steering refers to the type of correlations described in the EPR paradox, where one observer seems to affect (”steer”) the state of other observer by using local measurements. There have been several works regarding characterization and quantification of EPR steering. One characteristic of this non-local correlation is that it can be asymmetric, while entanglement is symmetric. This asymmetric property is relevant for potential applications of EPR steering to quantum information, in particular to quantum cryptography and quantum teleportation. This latter refers to the process where one observer sends an unknown quantum state to Bob, who is in a different location. They communicate by classical means. Here we will show that EPR steering is a necessary resource to obtain secure continuous variable teleportation. We will also consider NOON states, which is an example of an entangled state. For this state, we will present a steering signature. This contribution reviews the work derived in Refs. [1] and [2], which was presented as an invited talk in ELAF 2017.
Summary form only given. A particularly startling discovery by Bennett et al. is the possibility for teleportation of a quantum state, whereby an unknown state of a spin-1/2 particle is transported by Alice from a sending station to Bob at a receiving terminal by conveying 2 bits of classical information. Beyond the context of dichotomic variables, Vaidman has analyzed teleportation of the wave function of a one-dimensional particle in a beautiful variation of the original EPR paradox. Here we extend Vaidman's analysis to incorporate finite (nonsingular) degrees of correlation among the relevant particles.