An alternative picture of classical many body mechanics is proposed. In this picture particles possess individual kinematics but are deprived from individual dynamics. Dynamics exists only for the many particle system as a whole. The theory is complete and allows to determine the trajectories of each particle. It is proposed to use our picture as a classical prototype for a realistic theory of confined particles.
An alternative picture of classical many body mechanics is proposed. In this picture particles possess individual kinematics but are deprived from individual dynamics. Dynamics exists only for the many particle system as a whole. The theory is complete and allows to determine the trajectories of each particle. It is proposed to use our picture as a classical prototype for a realistic theory of confined particles.
General properties of many-body systems Definition of individual system So far we have studied the properties of single-body systems in prescribed external potentials. An individual physical system comprises a wave and a particle, both evolving in three-dimensional Euclidean space. Of course, isolating a system and representing the influence of other matter by an ‘external potential’ is an approximation to the real state of affairs in that we neglect the source of the potential. As a fundamental theory of matter quantum mechanics should apply to a closed many-body system (and ultimately to the universe as a whole) and reduce to a theory of systems of a few degrees of freedom as a special case under conditions where it is legitimate to neglect the ‘rest of the universe’. The extension of the quantum theory of motion to many-body systems is straightforward, although it displays some striking features not evident in the one-body case. To begin with, we define an individual n-body system as comprising: ( a ) A wavefunction ψ = ψ( x 1 , …, x n , t ) defined in a 3 n -dimensional configuration space in which x l , …, x n provide a set of rectangular Cartesian coordinates. ( b ) A set of n point particles pursuing trajectories x i ( t ) i = 1, …, n , in three-dimensional Euclidean space. A single configuration space trajectory is equivalent to n particle trajectories in Euclidean space. When we speak of a ‘many-body system’ we mean then a single wavefunction together with a set of particles.
The aim of this work is to show that particle mechanics, both classical and quantum, Hamiltonian and Lagrangian, can be derived from few simple physical assumptions. Assuming deterministic and reversible time evolution will give us a dynamical system whose set of states forms a topological space and whose law of evolution is a self-homeomorphism. Assuming the system is infinitesimally reducible—specifying the state and the dynamics of the whole system is equivalent to giving the state and the dynamics of its infinitesimal parts—will give us a classical Hamiltonian system. Assuming the system is irreducible—specifying the state and the dynamics of the whole system tells us nothing about the state and the dynamics of its substructure—will give us a quantum Hamiltonian system. Assuming kinematic equivalence, that studying trajectories is equivalent to studying state evolution, will give us Lagrangian mechanics and limit the form of the Hamiltonian/Lagrangian to the one with scalar and vector potential forces.
Abstract According to classical physics particles are basic building blocks of the world. These classical particles are distinguishable objects, individuated by unique combinations of physical properties. By contrast, in quantum mechanics the received view is that particles of the same kind (“identical particles”) are physically indistinguishable from each other and lack identity. This doctrine rests on the quantum mechanical (anti)symmetrization postulates together with the “factorist” assumption that each single particle is represented in exactly one factor space of the tensor product Hilbert space of a many-particle system. Even though standard in theoretical physics and the philosophy of physics, the assumption of factorism and the ensuing indistinguishability of particles are problematic. Particle indistinguishability is irreconcilable with the everyday meaning of “particle”, and also with how this term is used in the practice of physics. Moreover, it is a consequence of the standard view that identical quantum particles remain indistinguishable even in the classical limit, which makes a smooth transition to the classical particle concept impossible. Lubberdink (1998; 2009) and Dieks and Lubberdink (2011) have proposed an alternative conception of quantum particles that does not rely on factorism and avoids these difficulties. We further explain and discuss this alternative framework here. One of its key consequences is that particles in quantum theory are not fundamental but emergent; another that once they have emerged, quantum particles are always physically distinguishable and thus possess a physically grounded identity.
According to classical physics particles are basic building blocks of the world. Classical particles are distinguishable objects, individuated by physical characteristics. By contrast, in quantum mechanics the standard view is that particles of the same kind ("identical particles") are in all circumstances indistinguishable from each other. This indistinguishability doctrine is motivated by the (anti)symmetrization postulates together with the assumption (``factorism'') that each single particle is represented in exactly one factor space in the tensor product Hilbert space of a many-particles system. Although the factorist assumption is standard in the literature, it is conceptually problematic. Particle indistinguishability is incompatible with the everyday meaning of ``particle'', and also with how this term is used both in classical physics and in the experimental practice of physics. The standard view requires quantum particles of the same kind to remain indistinguishable even in the classical limit, so that a transition to the classical picture of the world seems impossible. Earlier we have proposed an alternative conception of quantum particles that does not rely on factorism and that avoids these and other problems. We further explain and develop this proposal here. In our view, particles in quantum theory are not fundamental but \emph{emergent}. However, in those situations where the particle concept is applicable, quantum particles---identical or not---are distinguishable in the same way as classical particles.
Particles in classical physics are distinguishable objects, which can be picked out individually on the basis of their unique physical properties. By contrast, in the philosophy of physics, the standard view is that particles of the same kind ("identical particles") are completely indistinguishable from each other and lack identity. This standard view is problematic: Particle indistinguishability is irreconcilable not only with the very meaning of "particle" in ordinary language and in classical physical theory, but also with how this term is actually used in the practice of present-day physics. Moreover, the indistinguishability doctrine prevents a smooth transition from quantum particles to what we normally understand by "particles" in the classical limit of quantum mechanics. Elaborating on earlier work, we here analyze the premises of the standard view and discuss an alternative that avoids these and similar problems. As it turns out, this alternative approach connects to recent discussions in quantum information theory.
Details of the many-particle system can also be read from my book titled “Quantum Field Theory: Feynman Path Integrals and Diagrammatic Techniques in Condensed Matter” [ 23 ]. The fundamental difference between classical and quantum mechanics relates the concept of indistinguishability of identical particles where each particle can be equipped with an identifying marker without influencing its behavior in classical mechanics. Besides in classical mechanics, the particle follows its own continuous path in phase space and so it is possible to determine the particular process taking place. So, principally, each particle in a group of identical particles can be identified which is not so in quantum mechanics. It is not possible to mark a particle without influencing its physical state, and worse, if a number of identical particles are brought to the same region in space, their wave functions will rapidly spread out and overlap with one another, thereby soon rendering it impossible to say which particle is where. One of the fundamental assumptions for many-particle systems is therefore that identical particles (i.e., particles characterized by the same quantum numbers such as mass, charge and spin) are, in principle, indistinguishable.