Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks

Non-Markovian Quantum Trajectories for Open Systems

Walter T. Strunz, Lajos Diósi, Nicolas Gisin

Published Dec 19, 2005• 1 citation

Abstract

We present a theory of non-Markovian quantum trajectories that describe the dynamics of a quantum system coupled to an environment of harmonic oscillators. When averaged over the noise, they reproduce the standard reduced density matrix without any approximation, in particular without Markov approximation. The time evolution of the environment can also be determined from these non-Markovian quantum trajectories. We present a simple example to demonstrate the power of our approach. As a remarkable feature of non-Markovian quantum trajectories, we show that for strong coupling to a dissipative environment with memory, the asymptotic state can be reached in a finite time. Further examples are described in the text.

DOI: 10.1007/0-306-47097-7_26

Related papers

Open System Dynamics with Non-Markovian Quantum Trajectories

Walter T. Strunz, Lajos Diósi, Nicolas Gisin

A non-Markovian stochastic Schr\"odinger equation for a quantum system coupled to an environment of harmonic oscillators is presented. The ensemble average recovers the reduced density matrix without approximation and hence it allows one to determine open system dynamics with strong and non-Markovian environmental effects in a very efficient way. We demonstrate the power of our approach with several illustrative examples. First, we discuss a measurement-type situation, then a two-state system strongly coupled to a non-Markovian environment, exhibiting decays and revivals. Further examples showing the remarkable features of our new approach to non-Markovian open system dynamics are discussed, for instance, the possibility to shift the ``Heisenberg cut'' between system and environment.

arXiv:quant-ph/9803079Physical Review LettersMar 1, 1999363 citations

Non-Markovian quantum state diffusion

Lajos Diósi, Nicolas Gisin, Walter T. Strunz

A nonlinear stochastic Schr\"odinger equation for pure states describing non-Markovian diffusion of quantum trajectories and compatible with non-Markovian master equations is presented. This provides an unraveling of the evolution of any quantum system coupled to a finite or infinite number of harmonic oscillators without any approximation. Its power is illustrated by several examples, including measurementlike situations, dissipation, and quantum Brownian motion. Some examples treat this environment phenomenologically as an infinite reservoir with fluctuations of arbitrary correlation. In other examples the environment consists of a finite number of oscillators. In such a quasiperiodic case we see the reversible decay of a macroscopic quantum-superposition (``Schr\"odinger cat''). Finally, our description of open systems is compatible with different positions of the ``Heisenberg cut'' between system and environment.

arXiv:quant-ph/9803062Physical Review ASep 1, 1998464 citations

Continuous measurement and non-Markovian quantum trajectories

Michael W. Jack, Matthew J. Collett

Based on a microscopic model of an open system consisting of a boson field coupled linearly to a system, we formulate quantum trajectories as continuous measurements of the output field from the system. We present a formulation for the case when the field quantity that is being monitored effectively commutes with itself at different times. In general, this results in a non-Markovian evolution for the reduced system conditioned on the measurements. Under the finite-memory time approximation this evolution can be numerically simulated. The generalization of the techniques of quantum trajectories to the non-Markovian regime is expected to contribute to our understanding of open system problems beyond the Born-Markov approximation.

Physical Review AMay 16, 200021 citations

Non-Markovian Dissipative Quantum Mechanics with Stochastic Trajectories

Werner Koch

All fields of physics - be it nuclear, atomic and molecular, solid state, or optical - offer examples of systems which are strongly influenced by the environment of the actual system under investigation. The scope of what is called "the environment" may vary, i.e., how far from the system of interest an interaction between the two does persist. Typically, however, it is much larger than the open system itself. Hence, a fully quantum mechanical treatment of the combined system without approximations and without limitations of the type of system is currently out of reach. With the single assumption of the environment to consist of an internally thermalized set of infinitely many harmonic oscillators, the seminal work of Stockburger and Grabert [Chem. Phys., 268:249-256, 2001] introduced an open system description that captures the environmental influence by means of a stochastic driving of the reduced system. The resulting stochastic Liouville-von Neumann equation describes the full non-Markovian dynamics without explicit memory but instead accounts for it implicitly through the correlations of the complex-valued noise forces. The present thesis provides a first application of the Stockburger-Grabert stochastic Liouville-von Neumann equation to the computation of the dynamics of anharmonic, continuous open systems. In particular, it is demonstrated that trajectory based propagators allow for the construction of a numerically stable propagation scheme. With this approach it becomes possible to achieve the tremendous increase of the noise sample count necessary to stochastically converge the results when investigating such systems with continuous variables. After a test against available analytic results for the dissipative harmonic oscillator, the approach is subsequently applied to the analysis of two different realistic, physical systems. As a first example, the dynamics of a dissipative molecular oscillator is investigated. Long time propagation - until thermalization is reached - is shown to be possible with the presented approach. The properties of the thermalized density are determined and they are ascertained to be independent of the system's initial state. Furthermore, the dependence on the bath's temperature and coupling strength is analyzed and it is demonstrated how a change of the bath parameters can be used to tune the system from the dissociative to the bound regime. A second investigation is conducted for a dissipative tunneling scenario in which a wave packet impinges on a barrier. The dependence of the transmission probability on the initial state's kinetic energy as well as the bath's temperature and coupling strength is computed. For both systems, a comparison with the high-temperature Markovian quantum Brownian limit is performed. The importance of a full non-Markovian treatment is demonstrated as deviations are shown to exist between the two descriptions both in the low temperature cases where they are expected and in some of the high temperature cases where their appearance might not be anticipated as easily.:1 Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2 Theory of Open Quantum Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2.1 Influence Functional Formalism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 2.2 Quantum Brownian Limit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2.3 Stochastic Unraveling of the Influence Functional . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 2.4 Improved Statistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 2.4.1 Modified Dynamic Response . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 2.4.2 Guide Trajectory Transformation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 2.5 Obtaining Properly Correlated Stochastic Samples from Filtered White Noise 24 3 Unified Stochastic Trajectory Propagation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 3.1 Semiclassical Brownian Motion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 3.1.1 Guide Trajectory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 3.1.2 Real Coherent State Center Coordinates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 3.1.3 Propagation Scheme Including Stochastic Forces . . . . . . . . . . . 32 3.2 Stochastic Bohmian Mechanics with Complex Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 3.2.1 Hydrodynamic Formulation of Bohmian Mechanics . . . . . . . . . . 33 3.2.2 Bohmian Mechanics with Complex Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 3.2.3 Stochastic BOMCA Trajectories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 3.3 Noise Distribution Preserving Removal of Adverse Samples . . . . . . . . . . 39 4 Dissipative Harmonic Oscillator. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 4.1 Reservoir Specification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 4.2 Harmonic Oscillator Analytic Expectation Values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 4.2.1 Ohmic Bath . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 4.2.2 Drude Regularized Bath . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 4.3 Sampling Strategies and Analytic Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 4.4 Limits of the Markovian Approximation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 5 Dissipative Vibrational Dynamics of Diatomics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 5.1 Molecular Morse Potential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 5.2 Anharmonic Phenomena . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 5.3 Transient Non-Markovian Effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 5.4 Trapping by Dissipation and Thermalization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 6 Tunneling with Dissipation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 6.1 Eckart Barrier Scattering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 6.2 Dissipative Tunneling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 6.3 Investigation of Markovianity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 7 Summary and Outlook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 Appendix A Conventions for Constants, Reservoir Kernels, and Influence Phases 69 Appendix B Stochastic Calculus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 B.1 Stochastic Differential Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 B.2 Position Verlet Scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 B.3 Runge-Kutta Fourth Order Scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 Appendix CMorse Oscillator Expectation Values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 Appendix DPrerequisites of a Successful Stochastic Propagation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 D.1 Hubbard-Stratonovich Transformation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 D.2 Kernels of the Reservoir . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 D.2.1 Quadratic Cutoff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 D.2.2 Quartic Cutoff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 D.2.3 Strictly Ohmic Reservoir . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 D.3 Guide Trajectory Integration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 D.3.1 Quadratic Cutoff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 D.3.2 Quartic Cutoff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 D.3.3 Strictly Ohmic Reservoir . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 D.4 Computation of Matrix Elements and Expectation Values . . . . . . . . . . 92 Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97

Sep 9, 20101 citation

Dynamics of time correlation functions and stochastic quantum trajectories methods in Non-Markovian systems

Daniel Alonso, Inés de Vega, John Gideon Hartnett +1 more

Open quantum systems are often encountered in many different physical situations. From quantum optics to statistical mechanics, they are fundamental in the understanding of a great variety of different phenomena. Some of the most common examples are the relaxation to equilibrium, the existence of nonequilibrium stationary states, and the dynamics of atoms in interaction with electromagnetic fields. A crucial step in the analysis is to consider the quantum open system and its environment as the two mutually interacting components of a larger isolated system. Thereafter, the so‐called Markov approximation is often considered, which consists on assuming that the time scales associated to the dynamics of the quantum open system are larger than those of the environment. It is the interplay of the different time scales associated with the system and the environment what determines the validity of the different approximations made. In this paper we will discuss the dynamics of a open quantum system in contact with a reservoir when the Markov approximation is not valid, and we have to include some non‐Markovian or memory effects.

AIP conference proceedingsJan 1, 20100 citations

Oscillatory Dynamics and Non-Markovian Memory in Dissipative Quantum Systems

Dante Marvin Kennes, Oleksiy Kashuba, Mikhail Pletyukhov +2 more

The nonequilibrium dynamics of a small quantum system coupled to a dissipative environment is studied. We show that (i) the oscillatory dynamics close to a coherent-to-incoherent transition is significantly different from the one of the classical damped harmonic oscillator and that (ii) non-Markovian memory plays a prominent role in the time evolution after a quantum quench.

arXiv:1211.0293Physical Review LettersMar 6, 201340 citations