Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cambridge University Press eBooks

Operator quantum error correction

David W. Kribs, David Poulin

Published Sep 5, 2013• 92 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract. This paper is an expanded and more detailed version of the work [1] in which the Operator Quantum Error Correction protocol was introduced. This is a new scheme for the error correction of quantum operations that incorporates the known techniques — i.e. the standard error correction model, the method of decoherence-free subspaces, and the noiseless subsystem method — as special cases, and relies on a generalized mathematical framework for noiseless subsystems that applies to arbitrary quantum operations. We also discuss a number of examples and introduce the notion of “unitarily noiseless subsystems”. A unified and generalized approach to quantum error correction, called Operator Quantum Error Correction (OQEC), was recently introduced in [1]. This model unifies all of the known techniques for the error correction of quantum operations – i.e. the standard model [2, 3, 4, 5], the method of decoherence-free subspaces [6, 7, 8, 9]

DOI
10.1017/cbo9781139034807.008

Related papers

Operator Quantum Error Correction

Chi-Kwong Li, Yiu‐Tung Poon, Nung-Sing Sze

This paper is an expanded and more detailed version of the work [1] in which the Operator Quantum Error Correction protocol was introduced.This is a new scheme for the error correction of quantum operations that incorporates the known techniques -i.e. the standard error correction model, the method of decoherence-free subspaces, and the noiseless subsystem methodas special cases, and relies on a generalized mathematical framework for noiseless subsystems that applies to arbitrary quantum operations.We also discuss a number of examples and introduce the notion of "unitarily noiseless subsystems".

Discrete mathematics and its applications•Nov 26, 2013•0 citations

New Approach to Quantum Error Correction

Ri Qu, Bing-jian Shang, Yan-ru Bao +1 more

Operator quantum error correction provides a unified framework for the known techniques of quantum error correction such as the standard error correction model, the method of decoherence-free subspaces, and the noiseless subsystem method. We first show an example of a new quantum error correction scheme which can not be described by operation quantum error correction. Then we introduce a different notion of noiseless subsystems according to the example. Base on this notion, we present a more unified approach which incorporates operator quantum error correction as a special case. Moreover, we also give a sufficient and necessary condition of quantum error correction using this approach. We show that this approach provides more recovery operations than operator quantum error correction, which possibly leads to simpler decoding procedures.

arXiv:1401.0456•Jan 2, 2014•1 citation

Recovery in quantum error correction for general noise without measurement

Chi-Kwong Li, Mikio Nakahara, Yiu‐Tung Poon +2 more

It is known that one can do quantum error correction without syndrome measurement, which is often done in operator quantum error correction (OQEC). However, the physical realization could be challenging, especially when the recovery process involves high-rank projection operators and a superoperator. We use operator theory to improve OQEC so that the implementation can always be done by unitary gates followed by a partial trace operation. Examples are given to show that our error correction scheme outperforms the existing ones in various scenarios.

arXiv:1102.1618•Feb 8, 2011•7 citations

Stabilizer Formalism for Operator Algebra Quantum Error Correction

Guillaume Dauphinais, David W. Kribs, Michael Vasmer

We introduce a stabilizer formalism for the general quantum error correction framework called operator algebra quantum error correction (OAQEC), which generalizes Gottesman's formulation for traditional quantum error correcting codes (QEC) and Poulin's for operator quantum error correction and subsystem codes (OQEC). The construction generates hybrid classical-quantum stabilizer codes and we formulate a theorem that fully characterizes the Pauli errors that are correctable for a given code, generalizing the fundamental theorems for the QEC and OQEC stabilizer formalisms. We discover hybrid versions of the Bacon-Shor subsystem codes motivated by the formalism, and we apply the theorem to derive a result that gives the distance of such codes. We show how some recent hybrid subspace code constructions are captured by the formalism, and we also indicate how it extends to qudits.

arXiv:2304.11442•Quantum•Feb 21, 2024•6 citations

Recovery in quantum error correction for general noise without measurement

Chi-Kwong Li, Mikio Nakahara, Yiu‐Tung Poon +2 more

It is known that one can do quantum error correction without syndrome measurement, which is often done in operator quantum error correction (OQEC). However, the physical realization could be challenging, especially when the recovery process involves high-rank projection operators and a superoperator. We use operator theory to improve OQEC so that the implementation can always be done by unitary gates followed by a partial trace operation. Examples are given to show that our error correction scheme outperforms the existing ones in various scenarios.

Quantum Information and Computation•Jan 1, 2012•12 citations

QUANTUM ERROR CORRECTION WITHOUT MEASUREMENT AND AN EFFICIENT RECOVERY OPERATION

Chi-Kwong Li, Mikio Nakahara, Yiu‐Tung Poon +2 more

1. IntroductionQuantum system is vulnerable to disturbance from the external environment, which leads todecoherence in the system. We have to overcome this difficulty to realize a working quanutumcomputer and a dependable quantum information processing. Quantum error correction (QEC)[1, 2, 3] is one of the most promising candidates for overcoming decoherence.QEC proposals to date are separated roughly into two classes, one employs extra ancilla qubitsfor error syndrome readout while the other, called operator quantum error correction (OQEC)employs a higher rank projection operator. However, the schemes have not been built in actualquantum computing or quantum information processing so far. This is dueto the following obstaclesinherent in these QECs; the syndrome must be read out by introducing ancilla qubits duringcomputing/information processing in the former case, while realization of a high-rank projectionoperator is physically challenging in the latter case.It was shown in [4] that for some quantum channels there exist different QECs in which nosyndrome measurements, no ancillas and no projection operators were required. Recovery operationand decoding operation are combined into a single unitary operation and the output state is a directproductof a decoded qubitstate and an ancilla state. Aqubit state isreproducedwithout recoveringthe codeword and, moreover, the projection operation is automatically built in our output state.The purpose of this paper is to extend the results in [4] to general quantum channels. We showthat for any quantum channel there is a unitary recovery operation, with which the output stateis a tensor product of decoded qubit state and an ancilla state. As a result, a decoding scheme canbe done by a unitary gate followed by a partial trace operation.The rest of the paper is organized as follows. We introduce the basic notions of OQEC andthen prove the main theorem in Section 2. We also give simple examples demonstrating our resultand a simplified proof of a theorem given in [2] illustrating that our recovery channel can be usedto do correction for many other channels related to ours. Section 3 is devoted to summary anddiscussions.

•Feb 8, 2011•1 citation
Abstract. This paper is an expanded and more detailed version of the work [1] in which the Operator Quantum Error Correction protocol was introduced. This is a new scheme for the error correction of quantum operations that incorporates the known techniques — i.e. the standard error correction model, the method of decoherence-free subspaces, and the noiseless subsystem method — as special cases, and relies on a generalized mathematical framework for noiseless subsystems that applies to arbitrary quantum operations. We also discuss a number of examples and introduce the notion of “unitarily noiseless subsystems”. A unified and generalized approach to quantum error correction, called Operator Quantum Error Correction (OQEC), was recently introduced in [1]. This model unifies all of the known techniques for the error correction of quantum operations – i.e. the standard model [2, 3, 4, 5], the method of decoherence-free subspaces [6, 7, 8, 9]
This paper is an expanded and more detailed version of the work [1] in which the Operator Quantum Error Correction protocol was introduced.This is a new scheme for the error correction of quantum operations that incorporates the known techniques -i.e. the standard error correction model, the method of decoherence-free subspaces, and the noiseless subsystem methodas special cases, and relies on a generalized mathematical framework for noiseless subsystems that applies to arbitrary quantum operations.We also discuss a number of examples and introduce the notion of "unitarily noiseless subsystems".
Operator quantum error correction provides a unified framework for the known techniques of quantum error correction such as the standard error correction model, the method of decoherence-free subspaces, and the noiseless subsystem method. We first show an example of a new quantum error correction scheme which can not be described by operation quantum error correction. Then we introduce a different notion of noiseless subsystems according to the example. Base on this notion, we present a more unified approach which incorporates operator quantum error correction as a special case. Moreover, we also give a sufficient and necessary condition of quantum error correction using this approach. We show that this approach provides more recovery operations than operator quantum error correction, which possibly leads to simpler decoding procedures.
It is known that one can do quantum error correction without syndrome measurement, which is often done in operator quantum error correction (OQEC). However, the physical realization could be challenging, especially when the recovery process involves high-rank projection operators and a superoperator. We use operator theory to improve OQEC so that the implementation can always be done by unitary gates followed by a partial trace operation. Examples are given to show that our error correction scheme outperforms the existing ones in various scenarios.
We introduce a stabilizer formalism for the general quantum error correction framework called operator algebra quantum error correction (OAQEC), which generalizes Gottesman's formulation for traditional quantum error correcting codes (QEC) and Poulin's for operator quantum error correction and subsystem codes (OQEC). The construction generates hybrid classical-quantum stabilizer codes and we formulate a theorem that fully characterizes the Pauli errors that are correctable for a given code, generalizing the fundamental theorems for the QEC and OQEC stabilizer formalisms. We discover hybrid versions of the Bacon-Shor subsystem codes motivated by the formalism, and we apply the theorem to derive a result that gives the distance of such codes. We show how some recent hybrid subspace code constructions are captured by the formalism, and we also indicate how it extends to qudits.
It is known that one can do quantum error correction without syndrome measurement, which is often done in operator quantum error correction (OQEC). However, the physical realization could be challenging, especially when the recovery process involves high-rank projection operators and a superoperator. We use operator theory to improve OQEC so that the implementation can always be done by unitary gates followed by a partial trace operation. Examples are given to show that our error correction scheme outperforms the existing ones in various scenarios.
1. IntroductionQuantum system is vulnerable to disturbance from the external environment, which leads todecoherence in the system. We have to overcome this difficulty to realize a working quanutumcomputer and a dependable quantum information processing. Quantum error correction (QEC)[1, 2, 3] is one of the most promising candidates for overcoming decoherence.QEC proposals to date are separated roughly into two classes, one employs extra ancilla qubitsfor error syndrome readout while the other, called operator quantum error correction (OQEC)employs a higher rank projection operator. However, the schemes have not been built in actualquantum computing or quantum information processing so far. This is dueto the following obstaclesinherent in these QECs; the syndrome must be read out by introducing ancilla qubits duringcomputing/information processing in the former case, while realization of a high-rank projectionoperator is physically challenging in the latter case.It was shown in [4] that for some quantum channels there exist different QECs in which nosyndrome measurements, no ancillas and no projection operators were required. Recovery operationand decoding operation are combined into a single unitary operation and the output state is a directproductof a decoded qubitstate and an ancilla state. Aqubit state isreproducedwithout recoveringthe codeword and, moreover, the projection operation is automatically built in our output state.The purpose of this paper is to extend the results in [4] to general quantum channels. We showthat for any quantum channel there is a unitary recovery operation, with which the output stateis a tensor product of decoded qubit state and an ancilla state. As a result, a decoding scheme canbe done by a unitary gate followed by a partial trace operation.The rest of the paper is organized as follows. We introduce the basic notions of OQEC andthen prove the main theorem in Section 2. We also give simple examples demonstrating our resultand a simplified proof of a theorem given in [2] illustrating that our recovery channel can be usedto do correction for many other channels related to ours. Section 3 is devoted to summary anddiscussions.