Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Statistical Physics

Stability of Ground States of 2d Strongly Asymmetric Correlated-Hopping Hubbard Model

Jacek Wojtkiewicz

Published Sep 1, 2003• 3 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1023/a:1024667609435

Related papers

On the BCS-BEC Crossover in the 2D Asymmetric Attractive Hubbard Model

Agnieszka Cichy

We analyze the evolution from the weak coupling (BCS-like limit) to the strong coupling limit of tightly bound local pairs in the 2D asymmetric attractive Hubbard model, in the presence of the Zeeman magnetic eld (h).The broken symmetry Hartree approximation is used.We also apply the KosterlitzThouless scenario to determine the phase coherence temperatures.We obtain that for the spin dependent hopping integrals (t ↑ ̸ = t ↓ ) the homogeneous polarized superuid (SCM ) phase in the ground state for the strong attraction and lower lling can be stabilized.We nd a topological quantum phase transition (the Lifshitz type) from the unpolarized superuid phase (SC0) to SCM and tricritical point in the (h -µ) and spin polarization (P ) vs. attraction (U < 0) ground state phase diagrams.The nite temperatures phase diagrams for t ↑ ̸ = t ↓ are constructed.

arXiv:1309.6671•Acta Physica Polonica A•May 1, 2012•0 citations

Electronic state in the 2D Hubbard model

Hideki Matsumoto, Ferdinando Mancini

Czechoslovak Journal of Physics•Apr 1, 1996•1 citation

Phase diagram of the asymmetric Hubbard model

Pavol Farkašovský

The ground-state phase diagram of the asymmetric Hubbard model is studied in one and two dimensions by a well-controlled numerical method. The method allows us to calculate directly the probabilities of particular phases in the approximate ground state and thus to specify the stability domains corresponding to phases with the highest probabilities. Depending on the electron filling $n$ and the magnitude of the asymmetry ${t}_{f}∕{t}_{d}$ between the hopping integrals of $f$ and $d$ electrons two different scenarios in formation of ground states are observed. At low electron fillings $(n\ensuremath{\leqslant}1∕3)$ the ground states are always phase segregated in the limit of strong asymmetry $({t}_{d}⪢{t}_{f})$. With decreasing asymmetry the system undergoes a transition to the phase-separated state and then to the homogeneous state. For electron fillings $n>1∕3$ and weak Coulomb interactions the ground state is homogeneous for all values of asymmetry, while for intermediate and strong interactions the system exhibits the same sequence of phase transitions as for $n$ small. Moreover, it is shown that the segregated phase is significantly stabilized with increasing electron filling, while the separated phases disappear gradually from the ground-state phase diagrams.

arXiv:0805.3988•Physical Review B•Feb 12, 2008•21 citations

The ground state of the two-dimensional Hubbard model

Yoshihiro Asai

arXiv:cond-mat/9909074•Physica B Condensed Matter•Jun 1, 2000•2 citations

Quantum criticality in the 2D Hubbard: from weak to strong coupling

Dimitrios Galanakis, Karlis Mikelsons, Ehsan Khatami +4 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 15, 2010•0 citations

Segregation in the asymmetric Hubbard model

Daniel Ueltschi

Abstract. We study the ‘asymmetric ’ Hubbard model, where hoppings of electrons depend on their spin. For strong interactions and sufficiently asymmetric hoppings, it is proved that the ground state displays phase separation away from half-filling. This extends a recent result obtained with Freericks and Lieb for the Falicov-Kimball model. It is based on estimates for the sum of lowest eigenvalues of the discrete Laplacian in arbitrary domains.

•Sep 13, 2013•14 citations
We analyze the evolution from the weak coupling (BCS-like limit) to the strong coupling limit of tightly bound local pairs in the 2D asymmetric attractive Hubbard model, in the presence of the Zeeman magnetic eld (h).The broken symmetry Hartree approximation is used.We also apply the KosterlitzThouless scenario to determine the phase coherence temperatures.We obtain that for the spin dependent hopping integrals (t ↑ ̸ = t ↓ ) the homogeneous polarized superuid (SCM ) phase in the ground state for the strong attraction and lower lling can be stabilized.We nd a topological quantum phase transition (the Lifshitz type) from the unpolarized superuid phase (SC0) to SCM and tricritical point in the (h -µ) and spin polarization (P ) vs. attraction (U < 0) ground state phase diagrams.The nite temperatures phase diagrams for t ↑ ̸ = t ↓ are constructed.
The ground-state phase diagram of the asymmetric Hubbard model is studied in one and two dimensions by a well-controlled numerical method. The method allows us to calculate directly the probabilities of particular phases in the approximate ground state and thus to specify the stability domains corresponding to phases with the highest probabilities. Depending on the electron filling nnn and the magnitude of the asymmetry tf∕td{t}_{f}∕{t}_{d}tf​∕td​ between the hopping integrals of fff and ddd electrons two different scenarios in formation of ground states are observed. At low electron fillings $(n\ensuremath{\leqslant}1∕3)$ the ground states are always phase segregated in the limit of strong asymmetry (td⪢tf)({t}_{d}⪢{t}_{f})(td​⪢tf​). With decreasing asymmetry the system undergoes a transition to the phase-separated state and then to the homogeneous state. For electron fillings n>1∕3n>1∕3n>1∕3 and weak Coulomb interactions the ground state is homogeneous for all values of asymmetry, while for intermediate and strong interactions the system exhibits the same sequence of phase transitions as for nnn small. Moreover, it is shown that the segregated phase is significantly stabilized with increasing electron filling, while the separated phases disappear gradually from the ground-state phase diagrams.