Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Jump Time and Passage Time: The Duration ofs a Quantum Transition

Lawrence S. Schulman

Published Nov 29, 2007• 20 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-540-73473-4_4

Related papers

Jump Time and Passage Time: The Duration of a Quantum Transition

Lawrence S. Schulman

Springer eBooks•Aug 3, 2007•8 citations

Mean first-passage time of quantum transition processes

Rong-Tao Qiu, Wu-Sheng Dai, Mi Xie

arXiv:1208.5110•Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•May 27, 2012•4 citations

Jump time and passage time: the duration of a quantum transition

Lawrence S. Schulman

Under unitary evolution, systems move gradually from state to state. An unstable atom has amplitude in its original state after many lifetimes ($τ_L$). But in the laboratory, transitions seem to go instantaneously, as suggested by the term "quantum jump." The problem studied here is whether the "jump" can be assigned a duration, in theory and in experiment. Two characteristic times are defined, jump time ($τ_J$) and passage time ($τ_P$). Both use Zeno time, $τ_Z$, defined in terms of $H$ and its initial state as $τ_Z \equiv \hbar/\sqrt{}$, with $E_ψ\equiv $. $τ_J$ is defined in terms of the time needed to slow (à la the quantum Zeno effect) the decay: $τ_J \equiv τ_Z^2/τ_L$. It appears in several contexts. It is related to tunneling time in barrier penetration. Its inverse is the bandwidth of the Hamiltonian, in a time-energy uncertainty principle. $τ_J$ is also an indicator of the duration of the quadratic decay regime in both experiment and in numerical calculations (cf. Fig.~2 of PRA 57,1509 (1998).) The passage time, $τ_P$, arises from unitary evolution sans interpretation. It is based on a bound of Fleming (Nuov. Cim. 16 A, 232 (1973)): for any $H$ and $ψ$ a system cannot evolve to a state orthogonal to $ψ$ for $t< τ_P \equiv πτ_Z/2$. By including apparatus in $H$, $τ_P$ limits the observation of decay according to the quantum measurement ideas proposed in "Time's Arrows and Quantum Measurement," Cambridge U. Press, 1997, thereby allowing an experimental test of these ideas.

arXiv:quant-ph/0103151•Mar 27, 2001•0 citations

First exit time: A theory of stopping times in quantum processes

Jean-Luc Sauvageot

Lecture notes in mathematics•Jan 1, 1988•8 citations

Observational line broadening and the duration of a quantum jump

Lawrence S. Schulman

Experimental observations of `quantum jumps' suggest that one can associate a timescale shorter than `lifetime' with quantum transitions; one such `jump time' is proposed here. We also find that experimental temporal localization of the jump does affect it (a lá Bohr), and predict an `observational line broadening'.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•May 7, 1997•29 citations

Upper bound on the duration of quantum jumps

Mathias Alexander Seidler, Ricardo Guti\'errez-J\'auregui, Alessandro Cer\`e +2 more

We present a method to estimate the time scale of quantum jumps from the time correlation of photon pairs generated from a cascade decay in an atomic system, and realize it experimentally in a cold cloud of 87Rb. Taking into account the photodetector response, we find an upper bound for the duration of a quantum jump of 21+/-11 ps.

arXiv:1812.00129•Dec 1, 2018•0 citations
Under unitary evolution, systems move gradually from state to state. An unstable atom has amplitude in its original state after many lifetimes (τLτ_LτL​). But in the laboratory, transitions seem to go instantaneously, as suggested by the term "quantum jump." The problem studied here is whether the "jump" can be assigned a duration, in theory and in experiment. Two characteristic times are defined, jump time (τJτ_JτJ​) and passage time (τPτ_PτP​). Both use Zeno time, τZτ_ZτZ​, defined in terms of HHH and its initial state as τZ≡ℏ/τ_Z \equiv \hbar/\sqrt{}τZ​≡ℏ/​, with $E_ψ\equiv $. τJτ_JτJ​ is defined in terms of the time needed to slow (à la the quantum Zeno effect) the decay: τJ≡τZ2/τLτ_J \equiv τ_Z^2/τ_LτJ​≡τZ2​/τL​. It appears in several contexts. It is related to tunneling time in barrier penetration. Its inverse is the bandwidth of the Hamiltonian, in a time-energy uncertainty principle. τJτ_JτJ​ is also an indicator of the duration of the quadratic decay regime in both experiment and in numerical calculations (cf. Fig.~2 of PRA 57,1509 (1998).) The passage time, τPτ_PτP​, arises from unitary evolution sans interpretation. It is based on a bound of Fleming (Nuov. Cim. 16 A, 232 (1973)): for any HHH and ψψψ a system cannot evolve to a state orthogonal to ψψψ for t<τP≡πτZ/2t< τ_P \equiv πτ_Z/2t<τP​≡πτZ​/2. By including apparatus in HHH, τPτ_PτP​ limits the observation of decay according to the quantum measurement ideas proposed in "Time's Arrows and Quantum Measurement," Cambridge U. Press, 1997, thereby allowing an experimental test of these ideas.