Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General

Observational line broadening and the duration of a quantum jump

Lawrence S. Schulman

Published May 7, 1997• 29 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Experimental observations of `quantum jumps' suggest that one can associate a timescale shorter than `lifetime' with quantum transitions; one such `jump time' is proposed here. We also find that experimental temporal localization of the jump does affect it (a lá Bohr), and predict an `observational line broadening'.

DOI
10.1088/0305-4470/30/9/006

Related papers

Jump time and passage time: the duration of a quantum transition

Lawrence S. Schulman

Under unitary evolution, systems move gradually from state to state. An unstable atom has amplitude in its original state after many lifetimes ($τ_L$). But in the laboratory, transitions seem to go instantaneously, as suggested by the term "quantum jump." The problem studied here is whether the "jump" can be assigned a duration, in theory and in experiment. Two characteristic times are defined, jump time ($τ_J$) and passage time ($τ_P$). Both use Zeno time, $τ_Z$, defined in terms of $H$ and its initial state as $τ_Z \equiv \hbar/\sqrt{}$, with $E_ψ\equiv $. $τ_J$ is defined in terms of the time needed to slow (à la the quantum Zeno effect) the decay: $τ_J \equiv τ_Z^2/τ_L$. It appears in several contexts. It is related to tunneling time in barrier penetration. Its inverse is the bandwidth of the Hamiltonian, in a time-energy uncertainty principle. $τ_J$ is also an indicator of the duration of the quadratic decay regime in both experiment and in numerical calculations (cf. Fig.~2 of PRA 57,1509 (1998).) The passage time, $τ_P$, arises from unitary evolution sans interpretation. It is based on a bound of Fleming (Nuov. Cim. 16 A, 232 (1973)): for any $H$ and $ψ$ a system cannot evolve to a state orthogonal to $ψ$ for $t< τ_P \equiv πτ_Z/2$. By including apparatus in $H$, $τ_P$ limits the observation of decay according to the quantum measurement ideas proposed in "Time's Arrows and Quantum Measurement," Cambridge U. Press, 1997, thereby allowing an experimental test of these ideas.

arXiv:quant-ph/0103151•Mar 27, 2001•0 citations

Nature of quantum jumps

Arthur A. Broyles

Recent experiments have found abrupt changes in the intensity of laser light scattered off single ions and atoms. These abrupt changes have been interpreted as resulting from Bohr's ``quantum jumps'' of the ion or atom from one state to another. In Bohr's description, such quantum jumps are not predicted by the Schr\"odinger equation and are introduced by additional postulates into quantum theory. We consider here an alternative explanation of these experiments using only properties of solutions of the Schr\"odinger equation and avoiding Bohr's added postulate.

Physical Review A•Apr 1, 1992•2 citations

Quantum jumps in atomic systems

R. Blatt, P. Zoller

The authors summarise the principal aspects of the recent discussion regarding the observation of Bohr's quantum jumps in resonance fluorescence from three-level systems. The experimental results are reviewed and possible applications are given.

European Journal of Physics•Oct 1, 1988•140 citations

Observation of Quantum Jumps

Thilo Sauter, Werner Neuhauser, R. Blatt +1 more

We have recorded the laser-excited resonance fluorescence of one to three ${\mathrm{Ba}}^{+}$ ions and observed Bohr's "quantum jumps" when an ion decayed to the metastable $^{2}D_{\frac{5}{2}}$ state, suddenly quenching its fluorescence. Most of the jumps mark Raman-Stokes scattering from the $^{2}S_{\frac{1}{2}}$ and $^{2}D_{\frac{3}{2}}$ levels.

Physical Review Letters•Oct 6, 1986•649 citations

Macroscopic quantum jumps

Partha Ghose

Introduction The quantum theory of atoms and molecules had its origin in the famous 1913 paper of Bohr [186] in which he suggested that the interaction of radiation and atoms occurred with the transition of an atom from one stationary internal state to another, accompanied by the emission or absorption of radiation of a frequency determined by the energy difference between these states. These transitions came to be known as ‘quantum jumps’. Since all experiments until the late 1970s used to be carried out with large ensembles of atoms and molecules, these jumps were masked and could not be directly observed; they were only inferred from spectroscopic data. In fact, with the advent of quantum mechanics they eventually came to be regarded as artefacts of Bohr's simple-minded semi-classical model. But with the availability of coherent light sources and single ions prepared in ion traps [187], [188], and optically cooled [189], [190], the issue has been reopened with the experimental demonstration of quantum jumps in single ions [191], [192], [193]. These experiments have also opened up the contentious issue of wave function collapse or reduction on measurement, as they can be regarded as making collapse visible on the oscilloscope screen [191]. Evidence of the discrete nature of quantum transitions in a single quantum system had been accumulating from the observation of photon anti-bunching in single-atom resonance fluorescence [194], the tunneling of single electrons in metal–oxide-–semiconductor junctions [195] and spin-flips of individual electrons in a Penning trap [196].

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 29, 1999•0 citations

Timeless Approach to Quantum Jumps

Ignazio Francesco Licata, Leonardo Chiatti

According to the usual quantum description, the time evolution of the quantum state is continuous and deterministic except when a discontinuous and indeterministic collapse of state vector occurs. The collapse has been a central topic since the origin of the theory, although there are remarkable theoretical proposals to understand its nature, such as the Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber. Another possibility could be the assimilation of collapse with the now experimentally well established phenomenon of quantum jump, postulated by Bohr already in 1913. The challenge of nonlocality offers an opportunity to reconsider the quantum jump as a fundamental element of the logic of the physical world, rather than a subsidiary accident. We propose here a simple preliminary model that considers quantum jumps as processes of entry to and exit from the usual temporal domain to a timeless vacuum, without contradicting the quantum relativistic formalism, and we present some potential connections with particle physics. Quanta 2015; 4: 10–26.

Quanta•Oct 11, 2015•24 citations
Experimental observations of quantum jumps' suggest that one can associate a timescale shorter than lifetime' with quantum transitions; one such jump time' is proposed here. We also find that experimental temporal localization of the jump does affect it (a lá Bohr), and predict an observational line broadening'.
Under unitary evolution, systems move gradually from state to state. An unstable atom has amplitude in its original state after many lifetimes (τLτ_LτL​). But in the laboratory, transitions seem to go instantaneously, as suggested by the term "quantum jump." The problem studied here is whether the "jump" can be assigned a duration, in theory and in experiment. Two characteristic times are defined, jump time (τJτ_JτJ​) and passage time (τPτ_PτP​). Both use Zeno time, τZτ_ZτZ​, defined in terms of HHH and its initial state as τZ≡ℏ/τ_Z \equiv \hbar/\sqrt{}τZ​≡ℏ/​, with $E_ψ\equiv $. τJτ_JτJ​ is defined in terms of the time needed to slow (à la the quantum Zeno effect) the decay: τJ≡τZ2/τLτ_J \equiv τ_Z^2/τ_LτJ​≡τZ2​/τL​. It appears in several contexts. It is related to tunneling time in barrier penetration. Its inverse is the bandwidth of the Hamiltonian, in a time-energy uncertainty principle. τJτ_JτJ​ is also an indicator of the duration of the quadratic decay regime in both experiment and in numerical calculations (cf. Fig.~2 of PRA 57,1509 (1998).) The passage time, τPτ_PτP​, arises from unitary evolution sans interpretation. It is based on a bound of Fleming (Nuov. Cim. 16 A, 232 (1973)): for any HHH and ψψψ a system cannot evolve to a state orthogonal to ψψψ for t<τP≡πτZ/2t< τ_P \equiv πτ_Z/2t<τP​≡πτZ​/2. By including apparatus in HHH, τPτ_PτP​ limits the observation of decay according to the quantum measurement ideas proposed in "Time's Arrows and Quantum Measurement," Cambridge U. Press, 1997, thereby allowing an experimental test of these ideas.
Recent experiments have found abrupt changes in the intensity of laser light scattered off single ions and atoms. These abrupt changes have been interpreted as resulting from Bohr's ``quantum jumps'' of the ion or atom from one state to another. In Bohr's description, such quantum jumps are not predicted by the Schr\"odinger equation and are introduced by additional postulates into quantum theory. We consider here an alternative explanation of these experiments using only properties of solutions of the Schr\"odinger equation and avoiding Bohr's added postulate.
We have recorded the laser-excited resonance fluorescence of one to three Ba+{\mathrm{Ba}}^{+}Ba+ ions and observed Bohr's "quantum jumps" when an ion decayed to the metastable 2D52^{2}D_{\frac{5}{2}}2D25​​ state, suddenly quenching its fluorescence. Most of the jumps mark Raman-Stokes scattering from the 2S12^{2}S_{\frac{1}{2}}2S21​​ and 2D32^{2}D_{\frac{3}{2}}2D23​​ levels.
Introduction The quantum theory of atoms and molecules had its origin in the famous 1913 paper of Bohr [186] in which he suggested that the interaction of radiation and atoms occurred with the transition of an atom from one stationary internal state to another, accompanied by the emission or absorption of radiation of a frequency determined by the energy difference between these states. These transitions came to be known as ‘quantum jumps’. Since all experiments until the late 1970s used to be carried out with large ensembles of atoms and molecules, these jumps were masked and could not be directly observed; they were only inferred from spectroscopic data. In fact, with the advent of quantum mechanics they eventually came to be regarded as artefacts of Bohr's simple-minded semi-classical model. But with the availability of coherent light sources and single ions prepared in ion traps [187], [188], and optically cooled [189], [190], the issue has been reopened with the experimental demonstration of quantum jumps in single ions [191], [192], [193]. These experiments have also opened up the contentious issue of wave function collapse or reduction on measurement, as they can be regarded as making collapse visible on the oscilloscope screen [191]. Evidence of the discrete nature of quantum transitions in a single quantum system had been accumulating from the observation of photon anti-bunching in single-atom resonance fluorescence [194], the tunneling of single electrons in metal–oxide-–semiconductor junctions [195] and spin-flips of individual electrons in a Penning trap [196].
According to the usual quantum description, the time evolution of the quantum state is continuous and deterministic except when a discontinuous and indeterministic collapse of state vector occurs. The collapse has been a central topic since the origin of the theory, although there are remarkable theoretical proposals to understand its nature, such as the Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber. Another possibility could be the assimilation of collapse with the now experimentally well established phenomenon of quantum jump, postulated by Bohr already in 1913. The challenge of nonlocality offers an opportunity to reconsider the quantum jump as a fundamental element of the logic of the physical world, rather than a subsidiary accident. We propose here a simple preliminary model that considers quantum jumps as processes of entry to and exit from the usual temporal domain to a timeless vacuum, without contradicting the quantum relativistic formalism, and we present some potential connections with particle physics. Quanta 2015; 4: 10–26.