Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Nature

Quantum superposition of distinct macroscopic states

Jonathan R. Friedman, Vijay Patel, W. Chen, Sergey K. Tolpygo, James E. Lukens

Published Jul 1, 2000• 1,158 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1038/35017505

Related papers

Superposition of macroscopically distinct states in quantum many-body systems

Tomoyuki Morimae

•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations

Macroscopic Quantum States: When Macroscopic Objects Enter Quantum Superposition

Runbiao Fang

Macroscopic Quantum States: When Macroscopic Objects Enter Quantum Superposition

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Slow Decoherence of Superpositions of Macroscopically Distinct States

Daniel Braun, Petr A. Braun, Fritz Haake

arXiv:quant-ph/9903041•Springer eBooks•Nov 14, 2007•7 citations

Macroscopicity of quantum superposition

Xiao-Fu Peng

arXiv:2506.14458•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Equivalence between macroscopic quantum superpositions and maximally entangled states: Application to phase-shift detection

Alfredo Luis

We demonstrate that the superpositions of macroscopically distinct coherent states are maximally entangled states. Among other possible applications of this result, in this paper we show that the experimental arrangements generating superpositions of macroscopically distinct coherent states may be adapted for precision phase-shift detection reaching the maximum sensitivity allowed by quantum physics (Heisenberg limit).

Physical Review A•Oct 5, 2001•43 citations

Proposal to test quantum mechanics against macroscopic realism using continuous variable entanglement: a definitive signature of a Schrödinger cat

M. D. Reid

In the Schrödinger-cat gedanken experiment a cat is in a quantum superposition of two macroscopically distinct states, alive and dead.The paradoxical interpretation of quantum mechanics is that the cat is not in one state or the other, alive or dead, immediately prior to its measurement. Because of this apparent defiance of macroscopic reality, quantum superpositions of states macroscopically distinct have generated much interest. Here we address the issue of proving a contradiction with macroscopic reality objectively, through the testable predictions of quantum mechanics. We consider the premises of macroscopic reality (that the ``cat'' is either ``dead'' or ``alive'', the measurement indicating which) and macroscopic locality (that simultaneous measurements some distance away cannot induce the macroscopic change, ``dead'' to ``alive'' and vice versa, to the ``cat''). The predictions of quantum mechanics for certain states, generated using states exhibiting continuous variable entanglement, are shown to be incompatible with the predictions of all theories based on this dual premise. Our proof is along the lines of Bell's theorem, but where all relevant measurements give macroscopically distinct results.

arXiv:quant-ph/0101052•Jan 12, 2001•0 citations
In the Schrödinger-cat gedanken experiment a cat is in a quantum superposition of two macroscopically distinct states, alive and dead.The paradoxical interpretation of quantum mechanics is that the cat is not in one state or the other, alive or dead, immediately prior to its measurement. Because of this apparent defiance of macroscopic reality, quantum superpositions of states macroscopically distinct have generated much interest. Here we address the issue of proving a contradiction with macroscopic reality objectively, through the testable predictions of quantum mechanics. We consider the premises of macroscopic reality (that the ``cat'' is either ``dead'' or ``alive'', the measurement indicating which) and macroscopic locality (that simultaneous measurements some distance away cannot induce the macroscopic change, ``dead'' to ``alive'' and vice versa, to the ``cat''). The predictions of quantum mechanics for certain states, generated using states exhibiting continuous variable entanglement, are shown to be incompatible with the predictions of all theories based on this dual premise. Our proof is along the lines of Bell's theorem, but where all relevant measurements give macroscopically distinct results.