Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

s-Wave Superconductivity Phase Diagram for the Two Dimensional Inhomogeneous Attractive Hubbard Model

Karan Aryanpour, Thereza Paiva, Warren E. Pickett, Richard T. Scalettar

Published Mar 5, 2007• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

The phase diagram and inhomogenous superconductivity in the one-dimensional attractive Hubbard model

ARMEN N. KOCHARIAN, Chia‐Wei Yang, Y. L. Chiang

Physica C Superconductivity•Nov 1, 2000•4 citations

d-wave superconducting phase diagram of the two dimensional Hubbard model

G. Sordi, P. Sémon

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 7, 2014•0 citations

Suppression of s-wave superconductivity by kinetic disorder in a two-dimensional attractive Hubbard model

Sanjeev Kumar, Prabuddha Chakraborty

The European Physical Journal B•Mar 1, 2015•3 citations

s -wave superconductivity phase diagram in the inhomogeneous two-dimensional attractive Hubbard model

Karan Aryanpour, Thereza Paiva, Warren E. Pickett +1 more

We study $s$-wave superconductivity in the two-dimensional square-lattice attractive Hubbard Hamiltonian for various inhomogeneous patterns of interacting sites. Using the Bogoliubov--de Gennes mean-field approximation, we obtain the phase diagram for inhomogeneous patterns in which the on-site attractive interaction ${U}_{i}$ between the electrons takes on two values ${U}_{i}=0$ and $\ensuremath{-}U∕(1\ensuremath{-}f)$ (with $f$ the concentration of noninteracting sites) as a function of average electron occupation per site, $n$, and study the evolution of the phase diagram as $f$ varies. In certain regions of the phase diagram, inhomogeneity results in a larger zero-temperature average pairing amplitude (order parameter) and also a higher superconducting critical temperature ${T}_{c}$, relative to a uniform system with the same mean interaction strength (${U}_{i}=\ensuremath{-}U$ on all sites). These effects are observed for stripes, checkerboard, and even random patterns of the attractive centers, suggesting that the pattern of inhomogeneity is unimportant. The phase diagrams also include regions where superconductivity is obliterated due to the formation of various charge-ordered phases. The enhancement of ${T}_{c}$ due to inhomogeneity is robust as long as the electron doping per site, $n$, is less than twice the fraction of interacting sites $[2(1\ensuremath{-}f)]$ regardless of the pattern. We also show that for certain inhomogeneous patterns, when $n=2(1\ensuremath{-}f)$, increasing temperature can work against the stability of existing charge-ordered phases for large $f$ and, as a result, enhance ${T}_{c}$.

arXiv:0708.0451•Physical Review B•Nov 30, 2007•23 citations

Inhomogeneity and d-wave superconductivity in the Hubbard model

Shiladitya Chakraborty, David Sénéchal, A.–M. S. Tremblay

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 24, 2011•0 citations

The phase diagram and inhomogenous superconductivity in the one-dimensional attractive Hubbard model

Kocharian AN; Yang C; Chiang YL

[[abstract]]The thermodynamic phase diagram of the attractive Hubbard model in the presence of magnetic field is calculated in wide range of temperature, electron concentration and coupling strength within the generalized self-consistent field (GSCF) approach, including the spin density correlations. The theory provides a smooth transition driven by applied magnetic field IL and temperature T from the homogeneous superconducting state into a spatially inhomogeneous state with the order parameter Delta ((-))(Q) not equal 0.

•Jan 1, 2000•0 citations
We study sss-wave superconductivity in the two-dimensional square-lattice attractive Hubbard Hamiltonian for various inhomogeneous patterns of interacting sites. Using the Bogoliubov--de Gennes mean-field approximation, we obtain the phase diagram for inhomogeneous patterns in which the on-site attractive interaction Ui{U}_{i}Ui​ between the electrons takes on two values Ui=0{U}_{i}=0Ui​=0 and $\ensuremath{-}U∕(1\ensuremath{-}f)$ (with fff the concentration of noninteracting sites) as a function of average electron occupation per site, nnn, and study the evolution of the phase diagram as fff varies. In certain regions of the phase diagram, inhomogeneity results in a larger zero-temperature average pairing amplitude (order parameter) and also a higher superconducting critical temperature Tc{T}_{c}Tc​, relative to a uniform system with the same mean interaction strength (${U}_{i}=\ensuremath{-}U$ on all sites). These effects are observed for stripes, checkerboard, and even random patterns of the attractive centers, suggesting that the pattern of inhomogeneity is unimportant. The phase diagrams also include regions where superconductivity is obliterated due to the formation of various charge-ordered phases. The enhancement of Tc{T}_{c}Tc​ due to inhomogeneity is robust as long as the electron doping per site, nnn, is less than twice the fraction of interacting sites $[2(1\ensuremath{-}f)]$ regardless of the pattern. We also show that for certain inhomogeneous patterns, when $n=2(1\ensuremath{-}f)$, increasing temperature can work against the stability of existing charge-ordered phases for large fff and, as a result, enhance Tc{T}_{c}Tc​.
[[abstract]]The thermodynamic phase diagram of the attractive Hubbard model in the presence of magnetic field is calculated in wide range of temperature, electron concentration and coupling strength within the generalized self-consistent field (GSCF) approach, including the spin density correlations. The theory provides a smooth transition driven by applied magnetic field IL and temperature T from the homogeneous superconducting state into a spatially inhomogeneous state with the order parameter Delta ((-))(Q) not equal 0.