Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Numerical analysis of capacities for two-qubit unitary operations (11 pages)

Barry C. Sanders, Dominic William Berry

Published Jan 1, 2005• 1 citation
OpenAlex

Related papers

Entangling capacity and distinguishability of two-qubit unitary operators (10 pages)

Anthony Chefles

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 2005•0 citations

Entanglement Capacity of Two-Qubit Unitary Operator with the Help of Auxiliary System

Hu, Baolin, Di +1 more

理论物理通讯:英文版•Jan 1, 2007•2 citations

Entanglement capacity of two-qubit unitary operator for rank two mixed states

Yao-Min Di, Li Liu

Science in China. Series G, Physics, mechanics & astronomy/Science in China. Series G, Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy•Nov 10, 2007•7 citations

Recognizing small-circuit structure in two-qubit operators (5 pages)

Stephen S. Bullock, Vivek Shende

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 2004•0 citations

Estimation of unitary quantum operations (6 pages)

Manuel A. Ballester

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 2004•0 citations

Trade-off relations and enhancement protocol of quantum battery capacities in multipartite systems

Yiding Wang, Xiaofen Huang, Shao-Ming Fei +1 more

First, we investigate the trade-off relations of quantum battery capacities in two-qubit system. We find that the sum of subsystem battery capacity is governed by the total system capacity, with this trade-off relation persisting for a class of Hamiltonians, including Ising, XX, XXZ and XXX models. Then building on this relation, we define residual battery capacity for general quantum states and establish coherent/incoherent components of subsystem battery capacity. Furthermore, we introduce the protocol to guide the selection of appropriate incoherent unitary operations for enhancing subsystem battery capacity in specific scenarios, along with a sufficient condition for achieving subsystem capacity gain through unitary operation. Numerical examples validate the feasibility of the incoherent operation protocol. Additionally, for the three-qubit system, we also established a set of theories and results parallel to those for two-qubit case. Finally, we determine the minimum time required to enhance subsystem battery capacity via a single incoherent operation in our protocol. Our findings contribute to the development of quantum battery theory and quantum energy storage systems.

quant-pharXiv:2512.14999•Frontiers of Physics•Dec 18, 2025•1 citation
First, we investigate the trade-off relations of quantum battery capacities in two-qubit system. We find that the sum of subsystem battery capacity is governed by the total system capacity, with this trade-off relation persisting for a class of Hamiltonians, including Ising, XX, XXZ and XXX models. Then building on this relation, we define residual battery capacity for general quantum states and establish coherent/incoherent components of subsystem battery capacity. Furthermore, we introduce the protocol to guide the selection of appropriate incoherent unitary operations for enhancing subsystem battery capacity in specific scenarios, along with a sufficient condition for achieving subsystem capacity gain through unitary operation. Numerical examples validate the feasibility of the incoherent operation protocol. Additionally, for the three-qubit system, we also established a set of theories and results parallel to those for two-qubit case. Finally, we determine the minimum time required to enhance subsystem battery capacity via a single incoherent operation in our protocol. Our findings contribute to the development of quantum battery theory and quantum energy storage systems.