Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

6.728 Applied Quantum and Statistical Physics, Fall 2002

Vladimir Bulović, Terry P. Orlando, Peter L. Hagelstein

Published Dec 1, 2002• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

8.05 Quantum Physics II, Fall 2002

Krishna Rajagopal

•Dec 1, 2002•0 citations

8.05 Quantum Physics II, Fall 2004

Iain W. Stewart

•Dec 1, 2004•0 citations

The Creation of “Entangled”: Employing the Filmic Narrative to Explain the Differences between Classical and Quantum Mechanics

Jordyn Roach

45 pages. A thesis presented to the Department of Applied Physics, Cinema Studies, and the Clark Honors College of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for degree of Bachelor of Science, Fall 2016.

•Dec 1, 2016•0 citations

8.06 Quantum Physics III, Spring 2003

Krishna Rajagopal

•Jun 1, 2003•0 citations

Can a falling tree make a noise in two forests at the same time?

Aephraim M. Steinberg

It is a commonplace to claim that quantum mechanics supports the old idea that a tree falling in a forest makes no sound unless there is a listener present. In fact, this conclusion is far from obvious. Furthermore, if a tunnelling particle is observed in the barrier region, it collapses to a state in which it is no longer tunnelling. Does this imply that while tunnelling, the particle can not have any physical effects? I argue that this is not the case, and moreover, speculate that it may be possible for a particle to have effects on two spacelike separate apparatuses simultaneously. I discuss the measurable consequences of such a feat, and speculate about possible statistical tests which could distinguish this view of quantum mechanics from a ``corpuscular'' one. Brief remarks are made about an experiment underway at Toronto to investigate these issues.

arXiv:quant-ph/9710046•Oct 21, 1997•5 citations

Non-Integrable Aspects

Giuseppe Mussardo

Abstract The integrable quantum field theories analyzed in the previous chapters provide the exact solution of many statistical models away from the critical point. Despite the elegance and the undeniable success of these methods, the generic situation that occurs in statistical physics is that of non-integrable dynamics: many interesting statistical models fall within this class and therefore it would be highly desirable to develop an appropriate formalism to deal with the lack of integrability. This task is notoriously difficult for the rich phenomenology that arises when the dynamics are not integrable: there are decays and production scattering processes, confinement phenomena and nucleation of false vacua, resonance peaks in the cross-sections, etc.

•Aug 27, 2009•0 citations
It is a commonplace to claim that quantum mechanics supports the old idea that a tree falling in a forest makes no sound unless there is a listener present. In fact, this conclusion is far from obvious. Furthermore, if a tunnelling particle is observed in the barrier region, it collapses to a state in which it is no longer tunnelling. Does this imply that while tunnelling, the particle can not have any physical effects? I argue that this is not the case, and moreover, speculate that it may be possible for a particle to have effects on two spacelike separate apparatuses simultaneously. I discuss the measurable consequences of such a feat, and speculate about possible statistical tests which could distinguish this view of quantum mechanics from a ``corpuscular'' one. Brief remarks are made about an experiment underway at Toronto to investigate these issues.
Abstract The integrable quantum field theories analyzed in the previous chapters provide the exact solution of many statistical models away from the critical point. Despite the elegance and the undeniable success of these methods, the generic situation that occurs in statistical physics is that of non-integrable dynamics: many interesting statistical models fall within this class and therefore it would be highly desirable to develop an appropriate formalism to deal with the lack of integrability. This task is notoriously difficult for the rich phenomenology that arises when the dynamics are not integrable: there are decays and production scattering processes, confinement phenomena and nucleation of false vacua, resonance peaks in the cross-sections, etc.