Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Optical and Quantum Electronics

Effective stimulated emission cross-sections determined by transient fluorescence amplification in a Fabry–Pe´rot resonator

A. Penzkofer, W. Holzer, S.-H. Gong

Published May 1, 1997• 7 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1023/a:1018532323057

Related papers

Absorption and Stimulated Emission Cross Sections

Galina A. Nemova

SPIE eBooks•Mar 23, 2022•0 citations

Calculation of the amplification coefficient of stimulated emission from fluorescence measurements

J. Pantoflíček

Czechoslovak Journal of Physics•Jan 1, 1967•4 citations

Effects of stimulated emission and phase conjugation on resonance fluorescence spectra (A)

David A. Holm, Murray Sargent, Stig Stenholm

Journal of the Optical Society of America A•Jan 1, 1984•1 citation

Influence of the cross-phase modulation effect on the polarization states of waves transmitted through a non-linear Fabry–Pe´rot cavity

T. Wo ́jcik, Barbara Rubinowicz

Optical and Quantum Electronics•Jul 1, 1997•0 citations

Erbium-doped fiber characterization by fluorescence dynamics measurement

Juan Carlos Martín, J.M. Alvarez, M. Á. Rebolledo

A technique for erbium-doped fiber characterization is presented. Its foundation lies in the study of the transversal and copropagating fluorescence time evolution when pumping is switched on and off. A model that describes these phenomena is developed, and experimental results, in good agreement with the model, are shown. The stimulated emission cross sections and an effective erbium-density distribution are determined from the measurements.

IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics•Jan 1, 1996•10 citations

Stimulated emission cross sections and temperature‐dependent spectral shifts of neutral nitrogen‐vacancy centers in diamonds

Teng‐I Yang, Terumitsu Azuma, Yu‐Wen Huang +3 more

Abstract The neutral nitrogen‐vacancy (NV0) defects in diamond are photostable color centers, suitable for a wide range of applications in science and engineering. However, the photophysical properties of the centers have not yet been fully characterized. This work measured the stimulated emission cross sections of NV0 in a single‐crystal diamond by two‐photon excitation of its matrix at 344 nm. From the measured photoluminescence spectrum and the fluorescence lifetime of 20 ± 1 ns, we determined a peak stimulated emission cross section of 1.43 ± 0.07 × 10−17 cm2 at 650 nm for the NV0 centers. In addition, we have also examined the thermal shifts of the zero‐phonon line of NV0 centers in nanoscale diamonds (~100 nm in diameter) over the temperature range of 30–120°C. A temperature measurement sensitivity of 0.2 K·Hz−1/2 was achieved, which is about two‐fold better than that of NV−, despite that the fluorescence intensity of NV0 is about six‐fold lower than that of NV− in the same nanoparticles. The result is attributed to the smaller electron–phonon coupling strength of the neutral center, compared with its negatively charged counterpart.

Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society•Dec 19, 2022•8 citations
Abstract The neutral nitrogen‐vacancy (NV0) defects in diamond are photostable color centers, suitable for a wide range of applications in science and engineering. However, the photophysical properties of the centers have not yet been fully characterized. This work measured the stimulated emission cross sections of NV0 in a single‐crystal diamond by two‐photon excitation of its matrix at 344 nm. From the measured photoluminescence spectrum and the fluorescence lifetime of 20 ± 1 ns, we determined a peak stimulated emission cross section of 1.43 ± 0.07 × 10−17 cm2 at 650 nm for the NV0 centers. In addition, we have also examined the thermal shifts of the zero‐phonon line of NV0 centers in nanoscale diamonds (~100 nm in diameter) over the temperature range of 30–120°C. A temperature measurement sensitivity of 0.2 K·Hz−1/2 was achieved, which is about two‐fold better than that of NV−, despite that the fluorescence intensity of NV0 is about six‐fold lower than that of NV− in the same nanoparticles. The result is attributed to the smaller electron–phonon coupling strength of the neutral center, compared with its negatively charged counterpart.