Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Foundations of Physics

Quantum Mechanics of the Composite System and Its Subsystems

Shigeru Machida, Akio Motoyoshi

Published Jan 1, 1998• 7 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1023/a:1018756303484

Related papers

The State of a Quantum System as a Subsystem of a Composite System

Matteo Campanella, David Jou, Maria Stella Mongiovı̀

UNIPA Springer series•Jan 1, 2020•0 citations

Elementary Properties of Composite Systems in Quantum Mechanics

Domenico Giulini

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2003•0 citations

Conditional Density Matrix: Systems and Subsystems in Quantum Mechanics

Vladimir Viktorovich Belokurov, Oleg Antonovich Khrustalev, Victor Antonovich Sadovnichy +1 more

A new quantum mechanical notion -- Conditional Density Matrix -- is discussed and is applied to describe some physical processes. This notion is a natural generalization of von Neumann density matrix for such processes as divisions of quantum systems into subsystems and reunifications of subsystems into new joint systems. Conditional Density Matrix assigns a quantum state to a subsystem of a composite system under condition that another part of the composite system is in some pure state.

arXiv:quant-ph/0210149•Oct 22, 2002•1 citation

Schwinger’s picture of quantum mechanics IV: Composition and independence

Florio M. Ciaglia, Fabio Di Cosmo, A. Ibort +1 more

The groupoid description of Schwinger’s picture of quantum mechanics is continued by discussing the closely related notions of composition of systems, subsystems, and their independence. Physical subsystems have a neat algebraic description as subgroupoids of the Schwinger’s groupoid of the system. The groupoid picture offers two natural notions of composition of systems: Direct and free products of groupoids, that will be analyzed in depth as well as their universal character. Finally, the notion of independence of subsystems will be reviewed, finding that the usual notion of independence, as well as the notion of free independence, find a natural realm in the groupoid formalism. The ideas described in this paper will be illustrated by using the EPRB experiment. It will be observed that, in addition to the notion of the non-separability provided by the entangled state of the system, there is an intrinsic “non-separability” associated to the impossibility of identifying the entangled particles as subsystems of the total system.

arXiv:2004.02472•International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics•Feb 11, 2020•19 citations

Quantum Mechanics of Large Systems

Walter E Thirring, Evans M. Harrell

•Apr 1, 1983•107 citations

Quantum correlations and dynamics from classical random fields valued in complex Hilbert spaces

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

One of the crucial differences between mathematical models of classical and quantum mechanics (QM) is the use of the tensor product of the state spaces of subsystems as the state space of the corresponding composite system. (To describe an ensemble of classical composite systems, one uses random variables taking values in the Cartesian product of the state spaces of subsystems.) We show that, nevertheless, it is possible to establish a natural correspondence between the classical and the quantum probabilistic descriptions of composite systems. Quantum averages for composite systems (including entangled) can be represented as averages with respect to classical random fields. It is essentially what Albert Einstein dreamed of. QM is represented as classical statistical mechanics with infinite-dimensional phase space. While the mathematical construction is completely rigorous, its physical interpretation is a complicated problem. We present the basic physical interpretation of prequantum classical statistical field theory in Sec. II. However, this is only the first step toward real physical theory.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Aug 1, 2010•11 citations
The groupoid description of Schwinger’s picture of quantum mechanics is continued by discussing the closely related notions of composition of systems, subsystems, and their independence. Physical subsystems have a neat algebraic description as subgroupoids of the Schwinger’s groupoid of the system. The groupoid picture offers two natural notions of composition of systems: Direct and free products of groupoids, that will be analyzed in depth as well as their universal character. Finally, the notion of independence of subsystems will be reviewed, finding that the usual notion of independence, as well as the notion of free independence, find a natural realm in the groupoid formalism. The ideas described in this paper will be illustrated by using the EPRB experiment. It will be observed that, in addition to the notion of the non-separability provided by the entangled state of the system, there is an intrinsic “non-separability” associated to the impossibility of identifying the entangled particles as subsystems of the total system.
One of the crucial differences between mathematical models of classical and quantum mechanics (QM) is the use of the tensor product of the state spaces of subsystems as the state space of the corresponding composite system. (To describe an ensemble of classical composite systems, one uses random variables taking values in the Cartesian product of the state spaces of subsystems.) We show that, nevertheless, it is possible to establish a natural correspondence between the classical and the quantum probabilistic descriptions of composite systems. Quantum averages for composite systems (including entangled) can be represented as averages with respect to classical random fields. It is essentially what Albert Einstein dreamed of. QM is represented as classical statistical mechanics with infinite-dimensional phase space. While the mathematical construction is completely rigorous, its physical interpretation is a complicated problem. We present the basic physical interpretation of prequantum classical statistical field theory in Sec. II. However, this is only the first step toward real physical theory.