Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Perfect state transfer: Beyond nearest-neighbor couplings (7 pages)

Alastair Kay

Published Jan 1, 2006• 2 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Almost Perfect State Transfer Over Arbitrary Distances

Robert Mereau, David L. Feder

URSCA Proceedings•Nov 30, 2015•0 citations

Perfect state transfer: Beyond nearest-neighbor couplings

Alastair Kay

In this paper we build on the ideas presented in previous works for perfectly transferring a quantum state between opposite ends of a spin chain using a fixed Hamiltonian. While all previous studies have concentrated on nearest-neighbor couplings, we demonstrate how to incorporate additional terms in the Hamiltonian by solving an inverse eigenvalue problem. We also explore issues relating to the choice of the eigenvalue spectrum of the Hamiltonian, such as the tolerance to errors and the rate of information transfer.

arXiv:quant-ph/0509065•Physical Review A•Mar 3, 2006•140 citations

Perfect state transfer on spin-1 chains

M. Asoudeh, Vahid Karimipour

Quantum Information Processing•Nov 19, 2013•8 citations

Analytic next-to-nearest-neighbor XX models with perfect state transfer and fractional revival

Matthias Christandl, Luc Vinet, Alexei S. Zhedanov

Certain nonuniformly coupled spin chains can exhibit perfect transfer of quantum states from end to end. Motivated by recent experimental implementations in evanescently coupled waveguide arrays, we extend the simplest such chain to next-to-nearest-neighbor couplings. It is shown analytically that perfect state transfer can be maintained under the extension and that end-to-end entanglement generation (fractional revival) can occur.

arXiv:1607.02639•Physical Review A•Sep 25, 2017•34 citations

Characterization of circulant graphs having perfect state transfer

Milan Bašić

In this paper we answer the question of when circulant quantum spin networks with nearest-neighbor couplings can give perfect state transfer. The network is described by a circulant graph $G$, which is characterized by its circulant adjacency matrix $A$. Formally, we say that there exists a {\it perfect state transfer} (PST) between vertices $a,b\in V(G)$ if $|F(τ)_{ab}|=1$, for some positive real number $τ$, where $F(t)=\exp(ıAt)$. Saxena, Severini and Shparlinski ({\it International Journal of Quantum Information} 5 (2007), 417--430) proved that $|F(τ)_{aa}|=1$ for some $a\in V(G)$ and $τ\in \R^+$ if and only if all eigenvalues of $G$ are integer (that is, the graph is integral). The integral circulant graph $\ICG_n (D)$ has the vertex set $Z_n = \{0, 1, 2, ..., n - 1\}$ and vertices $a$ and $b$ are adjacent if $\gcd(a-b,n)\in D$, where $D \subseteq \{d : d \mid n,\ 1\leq d

arXiv:1104.1825•Apr 11, 2011•12 citations

Universality in perfect state transfer

Erin Connelly, Nathaniel Grammel, Michael Kraut +2 more

Linear Algebra and its Applications•Jun 16, 2017•8 citations
In this paper we build on the ideas presented in previous works for perfectly transferring a quantum state between opposite ends of a spin chain using a fixed Hamiltonian. While all previous studies have concentrated on nearest-neighbor couplings, we demonstrate how to incorporate additional terms in the Hamiltonian by solving an inverse eigenvalue problem. We also explore issues relating to the choice of the eigenvalue spectrum of the Hamiltonian, such as the tolerance to errors and the rate of information transfer.
In this paper we answer the question of when circulant quantum spin networks with nearest-neighbor couplings can give perfect state transfer. The network is described by a circulant graph GGG, which is characterized by its circulant adjacency matrix AAA. Formally, we say that there exists a {\it perfect state transfer} (PST) between vertices a,b∈V(G)a,b\in V(G)a,b∈V(G) if ∣F(τ)ab∣=1|F(τ)_{ab}|=1∣F(τ)ab​∣=1, for some positive real number τττ, where F(t)=exp⁡(ıAt)F(t)=\exp(ıAt)F(t)=exp(ıAt). Saxena, Severini and Shparlinski ({\it International Journal of Quantum Information} 5 (2007), 417--430) proved that ∣F(τ)aa∣=1|F(τ)_{aa}|=1∣F(τ)aa​∣=1 for some a∈V(G)a\in V(G)a∈V(G) and τ∈R+τ\in \R^+τ∈R+ if and only if all eigenvalues of GGG are integer (that is, the graph is integral). The integral circulant graph $\ICG_n (D)$ has the vertex set Zn={0,1,2,...,n−1}Z_n = \{0, 1, 2, ..., n - 1\}Zn​={0,1,2,...,n−1} and vertices aaa and bbb are adjacent if gcd⁡(a−b,n)∈D\gcd(a-b,n)\in Dgcd(a−b,n)∈D, where $D \subseteq \{d : d \mid n,\ 1\leq d