Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Superoscillations Underlying Reeh-Schlieder's Theorem and Remote State Preparation for Relativistic Fields

Ran Ber, Oded Kenneth, Benni Reznik

Published May 1, 2014• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

We present a physical (gedanken) implementation of a generalized remote state preparation of relativistic quantum field states for an arbitrary set of observers. The prepared states are created in regions which are outside the future light-cone of the generating region. The mechanism, which is based on utilizing the vacuum state of a relativistic quantum field as a resource, sheds new light on the well known Reeh-Schlieder theorem, indicating its strong connection with the mathematical phenomenon of superoscillations.

Related papers

Superoscillations underlying remote state preparation for relativistic fields

Ran Ber, Oded Kenneth, Benni Reznik

We present a physical (gedanken) implementation of a generalized remote state preparation of relativistic quantum field states for an arbitrary set of observers. The prepared states are created in regions that are outside the future light cone of the generating region. The mechanism, which is based on utilizing the vacuum state of a relativistic quantum field as a resource, sheds light on the well known Reeh-Schlieder theorem, indicating its strong connection with the mathematical phenomenon of superoscillations.

arXiv:1405.0063•Physical Review A•May 14, 2015•8 citations

Photon localization: Local measurements, localized states, and causality

Jan Gulla, Johannes Skaar

We review what it means for a relativistic particle to be localized and argue that the most useful approach is through local measurement. This perspective ties localization directly to relativistic causality and measurable outcomes in spacetime. Strict localization in quantum field theory is formalized by states that give the same expectation value as vacuum for all local observables outside some spacetime region. With this formalism, single photons cannot be strictly localized, but coherent states can. The structure and interpretation of local observables and local operator algebras are discussed in connection with the Reeh-Schlieder theorem. Since probabilities of local measurement outcomes cannot vanish in vacuum, particle detection events must be phrased carefully. Key characteristics of strictly localized states are surveyed alongside concrete strategies for constructing them. The relationship between localization, causality, and on-demand sources is analyzed, finding that strictly localized states can represent localized, propagating information in quantum field theory. Explicit examples of localized photonic states are presented with an emphasis on quantum optics, including states that approximate single photons and (entangled) Bell states.

quant-pharXiv:2610.30473•Reviews of Modern Physics•Oct 23, 2026•0 citations

Relativistic Quantum Field Theory

Many of the "counterintuitive" features of relativistic quantum field theory have their formal root in the Reeh-Schlieder theorem, which in particular entails that local operations applied to the vacuum state can produce any state of the entire field.It is of great interest then that I.E.Segal and, more recently, G. Fleming (in a paper entitled "Reeh-Schlieder meets Newton-Wigner") have proposed an alternative "Newton-Wigner" localization scheme that avoids the Reeh-Schlieder theorem.In this paper, I reconstruct the Newton-Wigner localization scheme and clarify the limited extent to which it avoids the counterintuitive consequences of the Reeh-Schlieder theorem.I also argue that there is no coherent interpretation of the Newton-Wigner localization scheme that renders it free from act-outcome correlations at spacelike separation.

Princeton University Press eBooks•Mar 19, 2019•8 citations

Remote state preparation with quantum remote control

Peng Jia-yin, Ming-Qiang Bai, Zhi–Wen Mo

We put forward two novel and perfect protocols for preparing an arbitrary single–particle state and simultaneously implementing a rotation operator or an arbitrary unitary operator on that particle. There are schemes for either only teleporting particles or only remotely controlling quantun particles. If one has to remotely control a prepared quantum, then he/ she has to first do remote state preparation and then executes the remote control on the prepared quantum. Both operations ware done separately on two sets of entanglements. However, this intuitive solution is inefficient because many resources are wasted. Thus, we attempt to complete both operations by sharing one three–particle Greenberger–Horne– Zeilinger (GHZ) state. Comparing our two protocols with the corresponding intuitive solutions, respectively, the results show that our protocols are more efficient than the corresponding intuitive solutions. Only Pauli operators, controlled–NOT gate, Bell–state measurement, single–qubit measurement, Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen (EPR) state and GHZ state are used in our schemes, so these schemes are easily realized in physical experiment.

Physics & Astronomy International Journal•Jan 1, 2018•0 citations

Remote State Preparation: Arbitrary Remote Control of Photon Polarization

Nicholas A. Peters, Julio T. Barreiro, M. E. Goggin +2 more

We experimentally demonstrate the first remote state preparation of arbitrary single-qubit states, encoded in the polarization of photons generated by spontaneous parametric down-conversion. Utilizing degenerate and nondegenerate wavelength entangled sources, we remotely prepare arbitrary states at two wavelengths. Further, we derive theoretical bounds on the states that may be remotely prepared for given two-qubit resources.

arXiv:quant-ph/0503062•Physical Review Letters•Apr 20, 2005•277 citations

Remote state preparation with unit success probability

Nguyen Ba An, Thi Bich Cao, Nung Van Don +1 more

Abstract Remote state preparation is a secure and faithful method for transmitting known quantum states by means of local operation and classical communication. Existing protocols in the general case succeed just with probabilities of less than 100%. In this paper, we design a protocol to remotely prepare the most general single-qubit state that always succeeds. To achieve unit success probability, the preparer is allowed to use additional local resources and implement adaptive measurements. Our protocol is meaningful because the most expensive resource, i.e. the quantum channel previously shared between the preparer and the receiver, remains the same as in the original protocol (Pati 2000 Phys. Rev. A 63 014302), which, however, succeeds only half the time.

Advances in Natural Sciences Nanoscience and Nanotechnology•Jul 8, 2011•17 citations
We present a physical (gedanken) implementation of a generalized remote state preparation of relativistic quantum field states for an arbitrary set of observers. The prepared states are created in regions which are outside the future light-cone of the generating region. The mechanism, which is based on utilizing the vacuum state of a relativistic quantum field as a resource, sheds new light on the well known Reeh-Schlieder theorem, indicating its strong connection with the mathematical phenomenon of superoscillations.
We present a physical (gedanken) implementation of a generalized remote state preparation of relativistic quantum field states for an arbitrary set of observers. The prepared states are created in regions that are outside the future light cone of the generating region. The mechanism, which is based on utilizing the vacuum state of a relativistic quantum field as a resource, sheds light on the well known Reeh-Schlieder theorem, indicating its strong connection with the mathematical phenomenon of superoscillations.
We review what it means for a relativistic particle to be localized and argue that the most useful approach is through local measurement. This perspective ties localization directly to relativistic causality and measurable outcomes in spacetime. Strict localization in quantum field theory is formalized by states that give the same expectation value as vacuum for all local observables outside some spacetime region. With this formalism, single photons cannot be strictly localized, but coherent states can. The structure and interpretation of local observables and local operator algebras are discussed in connection with the Reeh-Schlieder theorem. Since probabilities of local measurement outcomes cannot vanish in vacuum, particle detection events must be phrased carefully. Key characteristics of strictly localized states are surveyed alongside concrete strategies for constructing them. The relationship between localization, causality, and on-demand sources is analyzed, finding that strictly localized states can represent localized, propagating information in quantum field theory. Explicit examples of localized photonic states are presented with an emphasis on quantum optics, including states that approximate single photons and (entangled) Bell states.
Many of the "counterintuitive" features of relativistic quantum field theory have their formal root in the Reeh-Schlieder theorem, which in particular entails that local operations applied to the vacuum state can produce any state of the entire field.It is of great interest then that I.E.Segal and, more recently, G. Fleming (in a paper entitled "Reeh-Schlieder meets Newton-Wigner") have proposed an alternative "Newton-Wigner" localization scheme that avoids the Reeh-Schlieder theorem.In this paper, I reconstruct the Newton-Wigner localization scheme and clarify the limited extent to which it avoids the counterintuitive consequences of the Reeh-Schlieder theorem.I also argue that there is no coherent interpretation of the Newton-Wigner localization scheme that renders it free from act-outcome correlations at spacelike separation.
We put forward two novel and perfect protocols for preparing an arbitrary single–particle state and simultaneously implementing a rotation operator or an arbitrary unitary operator on that particle. There are schemes for either only teleporting particles or only remotely controlling quantun particles. If one has to remotely control a prepared quantum, then he/ she has to first do remote state preparation and then executes the remote control on the prepared quantum. Both operations ware done separately on two sets of entanglements. However, this intuitive solution is inefficient because many resources are wasted. Thus, we attempt to complete both operations by sharing one three–particle Greenberger–Horne– Zeilinger (GHZ) state. Comparing our two protocols with the corresponding intuitive solutions, respectively, the results show that our protocols are more efficient than the corresponding intuitive solutions. Only Pauli operators, controlled–NOT gate, Bell–state measurement, single–qubit measurement, Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen (EPR) state and GHZ state are used in our schemes, so these schemes are easily realized in physical experiment.
Abstract Remote state preparation is a secure and faithful method for transmitting known quantum states by means of local operation and classical communication. Existing protocols in the general case succeed just with probabilities of less than 100%. In this paper, we design a protocol to remotely prepare the most general single-qubit state that always succeeds. To achieve unit success probability, the preparer is allowed to use additional local resources and implement adaptive measurements. Our protocol is meaningful because the most expensive resource, i.e. the quantum channel previously shared between the preparer and the receiver, remains the same as in the original protocol (Pati 2000 Phys. Rev. A 63 014302), which, however, succeeds only half the time.